Menu

14 Dec 2011: Smaller Nuclear Reactors
Recommended as Good Option for U.S.

A U.S. government-funded report has concluded that small, modular nuclear reactors may be the best option for continuing to develop the U.S. nuclear power industry in the wake of the disaster at

China’s Nuclear Power Plans
Unfazed by Fukushima Disaster

China’s Nuclear Power Plans Unfazed by Fukushima Disaster
In the wake of the Fukushima meltdowns, some nations are looking to move away from nuclear. But not China, which is proceeding with plans to build 36 reactors. Some experts are questioning whether China can safely operate a host of nuclear plants.
READ THE e360 REPORT
Fukushima, Japan. The report, prepared by the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago, said that smaller reactors that can essentially be mass-produced could be a safe, economically viable alternative to building larger nuclear reactors. Larger reactors produce gigawatts of power and can cost $10 billion to build, while the modular reactors would generate 600 megawatts or less and could replace aging, 200- to 400-gigawatt coal plants that will be phased out in the coming decades, according to the report. Co-authored by Robert Rosner, former director of the Argonne National Laboratory, the report said that the smaller reactors could be factory-built as modular components and then shipped to local sites for assembly. Rosner said that an important safety aspect of the modular reactors is that they are designed to eliminate the need for human intervention during an emergency, as the reactors can be cooled by thermal convection, rather than manually-operated pumps.


SEARCH


Donate to Yale Environment 360


ABOUT

Menu

SUPPORT E360

Menu

TOPICS

Menu

DEPARTMENTS

Menu

HOME PAGE

Menu