Menu
10 Sep 2009

New York City Girds Itself for Heat and Rising Seas

By the end of the century, New York’s climate could resemble that of present-day Raleigh, North Carolina and its harbor could easily rise by two feet or more. Faced with this prospect, the city is among the first urban centers to begin changing the way it builds its infrastructure — and the way it thinks about its future.
By bruce stutz

While computer-generated visions of floodwaters sweeping across Wall Street and inundating Manhattan island have come to represent apocalyptic predictions of climate change, the reality is that it won’t take an apocalypse for rising sea levels to threaten the integrity of the complex infrastructures that provide New York and the world’s major coastal cities with water, sanitation, transportation, power, and communications.

Adapting to this reality has become a key part of future planning for London, Rotterdam, St. Petersburg, Tokyo, and Seattle, as well as low-lying cities across Asia. In New York City the effort has brought together scientists, government agencies and public and private utilities in an effort to comprehend the effects of climate change on a city with a 570-mile coastline and where 8.5 million people live only about 10 feet above sea level.

With only a foot and a half of sea level rise — a realistic prediction for 2050 — a storm as severe as Katrina could require New York City to evacuate as many as 3 million people. A three-foot rise in sea level — which could well occur by the 2080s — could turn major storms into minor apocalypses, inundating low-lying shore communities in Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and Long Island; shutting down the city’s metropolitan transportation system; flooding the highways that surround the city; and rendering the tunnels that lead into the city impassable.

And what if humankind continues to pump greenhouse gases into the atmosphere at the current, massive rate and the Greenland ice sheet and West Antarctic Ice Sheet melt faster than predicted, causing sea levels to rise as much as six feet or more? That, concluded a report released earlier this year by the New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC), “would place much of the city underwater — and beyond the reach of any protective measures.”

Modeled on the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the NPCC’s report is the first part of an effort to adapt the city’s structures and infrastructures to future climate change. Under the co-chairmanship of researchers Cynthia Rosenzweig of NASA and Columbia University, and William Solecki of the City University of New York, the NPCC took the IPCC’s global climate models and scaled them down to develop projections of future temperature, precipitation, and sea level rise.

Their not-surprising conclusion was that despite the city’s — and the world’s — efforts to implement reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and energy use, New York City would have to begin preparing now for the changes to come, to develop a “risk-based, cost-benefit” adaptation strategy that would increase the city’s resilience to its changing climate, as well as give it the capacity to withstand the expected but unpredictable meteorological extremes.

While storm surges may be the most catastrophic threat, steadily rising temperatures may represent the most difficult challenge. Mean temperature in New York City may rise by two, five, or even as much as 7.5
While storm surges may be the most catastrophic threat, steadily rising temperatures may be the most difficult challenge.
degrees Fahrenheit by century’s end and make the city’s climate close to that of present-day Raleigh, N.C. The milder winters with few days below freezing and little snowfall — just about the only good news in the report — will be offset by long summers, with a third of the days above 90 degrees and marked by extended heat waves, frequent droughts, and more and more intense storms. By the end of the century, one-in-ten-year floods will come once every two to three years.

An Adaptation Task Force, made up of some 20 city departments, New York State and interstate authorities, and power and communications industries, has begun developing an inventory of infrastructures at risk. Working with local communities they hope to develop strategies — from keeping development away from the waterfront, to maintaining sewer systems, to evacuation plans, to protecting waterfront neighborhoods.

The Department of Buildings will reassess building codes to reduce energy use and make certain that homes can avoid flooding and high-rise apartment buildings can withstand increased storm winds. The city’s Office of Emergency Management is updating its floodplain maps to bring them into correspondence with predictions of rising sea level and expected storm surges.

While the task force’s final recommendations will not be released until the end of the year, some basic adaptation strategies are already evident. Some measures — as Adam Freed, the mayor’s liaison to the task force, points out — will be nothing more than making certain that systems already in place are working efficiently. That means making sure, for instance, that storm sewer catch basins are cleaned in anticipation of heavy rains, or that basic precautionary measures are taken, such as adding high-flow-level storm sewers and developing water retention basins on building rooftops to control runoff. Once these basic steps are taken, however, things become more expensive and complex.

Concern for storm surges will require raising the elevations of many key electrical, transportation, and communications infrastructures. A new waterfront power generating station on the East River, for example, has been built to withstand a 4-foot sea level rise. Older structures that
A new waterfront power generating station has been built to withstand a four-foot seal level rise.
contain control rooms for mass transit operations may require being enclosed in waterproof containment areas to protect critical equipment. When the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) replaced the pumps at its Rockaway water treatment facility not far from the city’s Atlantic shore in Queens, engineers set the pump motors some 17 feet higher than they had been before. If they didn’t, a decent storm surge in 2050 would put the motors underwater and shut down a vital pumping station. The cost of this small, but key, adaptation? Thirteen million dollars.

While the costs of adapting to climate change will be in the billions of dollars, New York City’s working philosophy is that the costs of not adapting will be far greater. Gary Heath, Director of the Bureau of Operations for the DEP’s Bureau of Environmental Planning and Analysis, says that the NPCC’s report puts everyone on the same page, providing a common set of predictions that every agency can work with.

“Engineers want to know precisely,” he says, “when it will happen and how much it will be.” From those predictions, he says, cost-effective adaptation strategies can be developed.

“Adaptation doesn’t take a wholesale plan,” Heath says. “It has to become part of an agency’s working philosophy. Once you recognize climate change as a risk to your infrastructure, then you take it into account in all of your designs and operations. You do it facility by facility.”

In a city the size of New York, says Heath, where a capital expenditure plan ideally projects needs and costs into the next century, an agency might evaluate a facility only once in five, 10, or even 20 years. So the changes made, such as those new pump motors, have to go beyond resolving immediate needs.

Should measured, gradual, and in situ steps prove insufficient, more radical — and expensive — proposals have been made. The most extreme of these would be to deal with the fact that the shape of New York City’s southern shoreline and harbor entrance — the geography that made it such an amenable port — acts, during a hurricane, to funnel winds and storm surges toward the city.

To counteract increasingly high storm surges, proposals have been made to construct one or more solid barriers across the entrance to New York harbor. The barriers — sea walls that allow water and ship traffic to flow
To counteract storm surges, the city may construct a storm barrier across New York harbor.
through during normal tides but that can be closed during storms — might also protect New York’s major airports — LaGuardia, Kennedy, and Newark — whose runways are now just barely above sea level. They would also protect wetlands, beaches, and salt marshes faced with severe storm erosion. Storm surge barriers already protect the port cities of London and Rotterdam, for instance, although increasing sea levels may soon make these earlier barriers obsolete. Rotterdam’s climate change adaptation strategy calls for building a half-dozen new storm barriers.

While storm surges and flooding might require the most drastic adaptation measures, Freed says that the most chronic effect of climate change on New York will be increasing temperatures. Like cities around the world, New York will face the threat of rising death tolls from heat waves, the result of global warming combined with increasing and aging urban populations. Counteracting the heat island effects of asphalt and concrete (summer temperatures in the city can be ten degrees higher than outside the city) will require incremental efforts. Adaptation measures already begun include new land-use requirements for open space, car-free zones, tree planting, and developing green spaces around parking lots and even on rooftops.

Rising temperatures will also worsen air quality. The city is seeking to institute congestion pricing to reduce the number of cars crowding its streets. It has begun efforts to cut back its own local emissions and energy consumption. These adaptation efforts will, it’s hoped, also serve to mitigate climate change effects. They may also bring cost savings. The city projects that its energy conservation measures will save billions over the next decade.

Adaptations not subject to engineered solutions may be far more difficult to devise and implement. The threat to the city’s Catskill Mountains water supply from extended droughts and heat waves, as well as from severe storms, will require a range of adaptations, from monitoring and metering water, to protecting watershed lands and forests.

Heath points out, for instance, that the amount of water flowing into the reservoirs declines when trees in the forests that surround them are in full
Thames
iStock
Floodgates across the Thames River in England
leaf. Longer growing seasons would mean substantially less water running into the reservoirs. The shortfall could be compounded by predicted long periods of drought that would further reduce flow and increase evaporation. On the other hand, Heath says that severe storms would create turbid runoff and could introduce pathogens into what is still an unfiltered water supply system. For the city, this means increasing stream and land use management efforts far north of the city limits and seeking restricted development along its watershed lands and forests.

New York City’s problems are not unique. Climate change presents complex and costly challenges to coastal cities around the world. London, like New York, recognizes that rising temperature will be its most urgent problem. It, too, is hoping to manage its heat island effect, implementing new land planning measures, including greening roofs and open spaces. London is encouraging the adaptation of building codes to minimize the need for air conditioning and to make it efficient and clean.

In Rotterdam, along with creating green roofs, the city plans to turn flood control barriers and levees into waterfront parks and turn water diversion canals into cooling waterways and “water plazas” within the city itself.

Adapting to climate change will be more difficult in cities in India, Asia, and Africa where infrastructures are already stressed by overpopulation and poverty, and where rising temperatures may bring increased risks of disease. Low-lying Bangladesh, which is especially susceptible to sea level increases, has proposed a $4.35 billion adaptation program. What New York City now has that most of these other cities don’t, is a local model of climate change all its agencies can work from. But if the projections are wrong? If the world’s seas rise more rapidly than predicted by the IPCC and NPCC? Then, the result may be more than just a fantastic animation.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Bruce Stutz writes on science, nature, and the environment. A former editor-in-chief of Natural History, he is a contributing editor to OnEarth. He has written for the New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor, The Washington Post, Discover and Audubon. He is the author of Natural Lives, Modern Times and Chasing Spring, An American Journey Through a Changing Season. In recent articles for Yale Environment 360, Stutz wrote about how researchers have been discovering species at a record pace and the role adaptation will play in any climate change plan.
MORE BY THIS AUTHOR

SHARE: Tweet | Digg | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Mixx | Facebook | Stumble Upon

COMMENTS


I was surprised that there was not more discussion of the proposal by Malcolm Bowman and colleagues at Stony Brook for storm surge barriers to protect at least parts of New York City. See http://stormy.msrc.sunysb.edu/ and (1) Nov/Dec 2005. "Storm Surge Barriers for New York Harbor" by Christine Van Lenten. Update (cover story - html). New York Academy of Sciences Magazine, pp. 6-9. (2) Bowman, M., D. Hill, F. Buonaiuto, B. Colle, R. Flood, R. Wilson, R. Hunter, and J. Wang, 2008: Threats and responses associated with rapid climate change in metropolitan New York, pp. 119-142 in Sudden and Disruptive Climate Change: Exploring the Real Risks and How We Can Avoid Them, M. C. MacCracken, F. Moore, and J. C. Topping, Jr., eds., Earthscan, London, UK, 326 pp.
Posted by Mike MacCracken on 10 Sep 2009


6 feet? The last IPCC report I read said 10 to 60 cm. I guess that is a harder range to scare people with.
Posted by James on 13 Sep 2009


Sea level rises are based on computer models. What does the empirical science say? According to the University of Colorado at Boulder Sea Level Change analysis, sea levels have actually flattened since 2006. Hydrographic observations demonstrate an apparent cooling of the oceans since 2002, which would imply up to 2mm drop in sea levels [E W Leuliette &R S Neren} Also , Cliff Ollier has found that "graphs of sea level for 12 locations in the South West Pacific show stable sea levels for about 10 years over this region " this data seems to fit with the actual data, as agaainst the computer projections, from every other region.. And while Im at it, the Greenland and Antarctic ice shelves actually lie in bowls betwixt mountain ranges, so it is pretty unlikely that they will be going anywhere soon. Please look at the actual data, not at the computer projections.
Posted by ian hilliar on 13 Sep 2009


A significant rise that “would place much of the city underwater — and beyond the reach of any protective measures.”

Sounds like the same kind of progress yielded by 1,000 lawyers at the bottom of the sea and prompts the same question: How do we get more?

Seriously, can we get beyond the fear mongering? Even the UN projects only rises in low centimeters. Who is predicting a four-foot rise in mean sea level?
Posted by Geo on 14 Sep 2009


Where, pray tell, is this water coming from? Not the Arctic. It is already floating. Not Greenland. Between 1942 and 1992, ice thickness increased over 260 feet on the southeastern corner.
And for the past 10 years, average temp in Greenland was -13deg C. And trending downward. (ref: www2.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=greenland+temperature)
Not Antarctica. 91%of the worlds glacial ice is there. As mentioned before, the ice there sits in a bowl. And the average temp there is about -40deg C.
Posted by barryjo on 15 Sep 2009


New York city can change its infrastructure development style, can fortify the whole city or even shift the people to other planets, but isn't it like running way from the problem? But how long? How far?? Shouldn't we think unitedly for the permanent solution so that our dear earth will not only be friendly earth but the mother earth? And should New York, the most capable city of the most capable country, hold the lead?
Posted by padam pande on 17 Sep 2009


It is unfortunate that a number of the postings above have chosen to post false information so as to cloud a very well understood issue.

Sea level rise has occurred at a mean level of 1.8 mm per year for the last century (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_sea_level_rise) and has averaged 3 mm per year over the last 10 years. Ocean temperatures are also known to be at their highest levels in recorded history this year (2009).

New York is not located in the South Pacific, so sea level data from such a region is of no value to the people in New York. Additionally, sea level change is actually higher in the Mid-Atlantic region of the US than the global averages.

Melting does not occur based on temperature averages -- it is based primarily on Summer heating. Primary contributions to sea level rise are from South East Greenland and Western Antarctica.

All of this information is readily available from multiple sources and can be easily verified.

Much of the world is spending billions of dollars on projects to adapt to climate change because it is happening now, not tomorrow.
Posted by Jorden Woods on 02 Oct 2009


Fascinating piece. Many thanks. Why does NYC continue to spend millions expanding underground subway systems? Is there incorporation of any new breakthrough engineering (if such a thing) that will make the tunnels less vulnerable to flooding? And how far is the city in solar power development (on all that flat rooftop property)?
Posted by Dominique Browning on 29 Oct 2009


Hear, hear, New York City! It’s about time some American cities start taking this stuff seriously.
Because, as you point, if our infrastructures stay as they are, the question isn’t whether we’re
running out of time or not, but only when. So what confounds me in this discussion is all
this talk of cost.

Clearly if mankind wants to keep (civilized) human life on the planet continuing in perpetuity,
and we plan to go and keep reproducing at the rate we are, then cost can not be an issue.
When you’re talking about saving mankind, why are you even mentioning cost - whether you’re talking about America or anywhere else in the
world?

Because the rich nations can’t afford to let the poor nation’s crumble in this storm either. The
rich need the poor, and we all know it. So ultimately, none of these other countries you
name in your closing paragraph will fall either, because we can’t let them.

As the climate changes and there’s less rainfall and snowfall overall, that means less water
added to the water table, which these days has all these horrible pollutants building up in them. So with less new water going in, that’ll only lead to more ppm of these toxins in our water, year over year.

No other budgetary concerns will matter if we’re not around to debate the issue.

Posted by Matteo | Sonovoip on 11 Dec 2009


It is commendable that New York is rethinking its infrastructural design in a bid to adapt to climate change. Indeed, doing nothing will cost more – in terms of damage to building and infrastructure and with these, human life.

I was particularly struck by plans to reassess the city's building codes with a view to reducing energy use. Ordinary citizens can complement this creditable initiative by using low-energy bulbs and energy-star qualified freezers, refrigerators and other appliances that reduce their carbon footprint. While every household's contribution will likely be infinitesimal, every little will help to mitigate climate change.

Posted by Ateenyi on 03 Feb 2010


NYC is way ahead of many of major cities in the world. They have done a great job.

Posted by Jenn on 01 Mar 2011



 

RELATED ARTICLES


A New Frontier for Fracking: Drilling Near the Arctic Circle
Hydraulic fracturing is about to move into the Canadian Arctic, with companies exploring the region's rich shale oil deposits. But many indigenous people and conservationists have serious concerns about the impact of fracking in more fragile northern environments.
READ MORE

Making Farm Animal Rights A Fundamental Green Issue
As president of the Humane Society of the United States, Wayne Pacelle has pushed the animal welfare group into areas that directly impact the environment. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, he talks about how what we eat, how we raise our food, and how we treat farm animals are basic conservation issues.
READ MORE

Scientists Look for Causes of Baffling Die-Off of Sea Stars
Sea stars on both coasts of North America are dying en masse from a disease that kills them in a matter of days. Researchers are looking at various pathogens that may be behind what is known as sea star wasting syndrome, but they suspect that a key contributing factor is warming ocean waters.
READ MORE

Where Will Earth Head After Its ‘Climate Departure’?
Will the planet reach a point where its climate is significantly different from what has existed throughout human history, and if so, when? In an interview with Yale Environment 360, biogeographer Camilo Mora talks about recent research on this disquieting issue and what it means for the coming decades.
READ MORE

Obama’s New Emission Rules: Will They Survive Challenges?
The sweeping nature of President Obama’s proposed regulations limiting carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants is likely to open his initiative to serious legal challenges. To date, however, the courts have given the federal government wide latitude in regulating CO2 under the Clean Air Act.
READ MORE


SEARCH


Donate to Yale Environment 360


ABOUT

Menu

SUPPORT E360

Menu

TOPICS

Menu

DEPARTMENTS

Menu

HOME PAGE

Menu