02 Nov 2009

Coping With Climate Change: Which Societies Will Do Best?

As the world warms, how different societies fare in dealing with rising seas and changing weather patterns will have as much to do with political, social, and economic factors as with a changing climate.
By gaia vince

Following the disastrous tsunami of December 2004, the government of Bangladesh embraced upgraded storm-alert systems that warn communities in a coordinated way and improved social support networks, resulting in a drastic reduction in typhoon deaths. In neighboring Myanmar, by contrast, deaths from natural disasters have risen in recent years. Indeed, the deaths that occurred there last year in the aftermath of Cyclone Nargis cannot be separated from the fact that Myanmar has an authoritarian regime that prevents international assistance from reaching those in need, rendering its citizens unable to cope with extreme weather disasters – events that are expected to become more frequent with climate change.

The stark contrast between Bangladesh and Myanmar, both likely facing serious threats from rising sea levels and more intense typhoons as the world warms, is a striking example of a key measure of how different parts of the world are going to cope with climate change in the coming century: whether societies are “climate-fit” or “climate-weak.” In fact, how different societies fare as temperatures rise will have as much to do with political, social, technological, and economic factors as with a changing climate.

That global warming will exact a human toll is undisputed, but the extent of its predicted impacts is uncertain. So how can we best identify those most at risk? Applying Darwinian principles, climate change, like any other assault on our species, is about survival of the fittest. We need to recognize what makes a community “climate-fit,” and how to improve fitness in “climate-weak” populations.

Geography is important, of course — climate-fit people live in areas less vulnerable to sea level rise, for example. But it is only one factor, and the
If people feel they have control over their situation, they begin to work out solutions.”
strength of a society – its resilience, ingenuity, and flexibility, as well as its governance — will have a great deal to do with how it fares in the face of climate change. People who live in countries that are well-governed, and who belong to communities that are more self-reliant and exist within the sustainable limits of the available resources, are plainly going to be better able to weather the impacts of climate change.

In Gujarat, India, for example, I have visited drought-stricken villages, separated by less than 1 kilometer, whose approach to severe water shortages made the difference between abundance and dependence. In one village, residents have collected and stored monsoon rains for the dry season, built barriers to slow monsoon rains so they penetrate the water table and wells, and created an effective irrigation system. They harvest three bountiful crops per year. The neighboring village has not taken such steps, and it manages just one poor harvest and is reliant on government water tankers to provide drinking water for seven months of the year.

I have seen neighboring islands in the Maldives, where on one, houses have been abandoned and even washed away because of erosion exacerbated by sea-level rise, while on the other, coral and mangrove conservation have kept all the homes secure.

Where people take responsibility for their destiny, they are far more likely to employ sound practices, like traditional water management strategies. “If people feel they have control over their situation, they begin to work out practical solutions to the problem,” says Tom Crompton, of WWF, who studies the psychology of climate change. “But, as studies in Norway during glacier melt have shown, when people feel they are impotent to do anything, they employ emotional management strategies like denial, which help no one.”

Flexibility is also an important measure of climate fitness, whether it is the emotional flexibility that prepares people to make long migrations from their soon-to-be-flooded homes in the Bay of Bengal, or the flexibility that allows a Bangladeshi rice farmer to convert to shrimp farming to deal with increased salinity from rising seas.

Effective governance is obviously crucial to a society’s climate fitness. This
Populations that are ‘climate-fit’ can become ‘climate-weak’ because of poor government.
includes removing the barriers that prevent people and communities from improving their lives, as well as inequalities of caste, ethnicity, religion, or tribes. The chaos of war, violence, or the complete breakdown of government — as seen in Nepal, Afghanistan, or the resource-rich Indian state of Bihar — can leave populations climate-weakened.

Populations that also are reasonably climate-fit can become climate-weak because of the poor decisions of their governments. A case in point is Laos. Climate models for the region predict a greater variability in the monsoon patterns over the coming decades in this Southeast Asian nation, which is ranked as one of the world’s least developed countries. In May, the United Nations set up a special task force to look at climate adaptation in Laos, aimed at readying the population for drought and flooding scenarios.

By any measure, villagers I met in my recent journey across Laos were poor and backward. Despite that, however, the Laotian people’s degree of self-sufficiency is so high that — for now — they are among the most climate-fit societies in the world.

Roughly 80 percent of the Laotian people are subsistence farmers and fishermen, supplementing their cultivated harvest from the natural resources that remain extraordinarily abundant in this sliver of land between Vietnam, China, Thailand, and Cambodia. Villagers collect everything from construction materials to food, including insects, herbs, fruit, nuts, and mushrooms from the forests. The Mekong and its many tributaries provide the fish that make up 80 percent of the dietary protein of the 6.3 million Lao, as well as water and a social meeting place for these strong, supportive communities.

If the people were to continue living as they currently do, then Laotians would be in a good position to cope with the impacts of climate change. But the climate fitness of the Laotian people is being threatened by their own government, which is busy selling off the country’s resources, including timber concessions and a planned series of large hydropower dams that threaten fish populations and the ability of Laotians to feed themselves, and thereby raise their vulnerability to climate change.

Good governance is not necessarily a characteristic of a Western model. “Vietnam used to have a very robust method of dealing with typhoons and hurricanes, but this all fell apart when they embraced capitalism,” says Saleem Huq, director of the climate change program at the International Institute for Environment and Development. “Generally, though, democratic countries are more robust because there is a means of challenging the powers and holding them to account. You don’t get famines in a democracy.”

Going hand-in-hand with good leadership is smart development policy. Indian states such as Gujarat, which are starting to wean farmers off unsustainable agriculture and into new industries, are improving the
The global community has a duty to confront the uncomfortable socio-political aspect of climate vulnerability.
people’s climate fitness, as are policies in Kothapally in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, where scientists are helping villagers to grow semi-arid crops, such as millet, in place of rice. Poor development policy, however well intended, can also weaken climate fitness. This includes government subsidies for unsustainable agriculture that promote thirsty crops, such as rice, or provide unrealistically cheap electricity for groundwater pumps.

Sound environmental guardianship is perhaps one of the most important traits of governments and societies that hope to improve their ability to deal with climate change. Countries such as Costa Rica, where the environment is preserved as an important part of the tourism economy, are more climate-fit than places like Indonesia, China or Madagascar, where the government allows or sponsors environmental degradation, such as widespread deforestation.

Another key component of climate fitness is the equality and empowerment of women and minority groups. Natalie Curtis, a senior press spokesman at Oxfam, said that sea level rise and an increase in extreme weather events in Bangladesh has been a “double-edged sword.” The impacts have been “horrific”, she said, but they have led to the creation of councils of women in every village “who are leading the efforts for community survival.”

Hurricane Katrina’s impact on New Orleans was also a stark example of climate weakness, as social inequality – and poor governance – led to tens of thousands of the city’s poorest residents being stranded for days.

As the atmosphere and oceans warm this century — leading, in all likelihood, to an increase in extreme weather events, sea level rise, drought, and greater political conflict — suffering and climate-related deaths need not be a fait accompli. The global community has a duty to confront the uncomfortable socio-political aspect of climate vulnerability in order to help climate-weak people tool up to climate fitness. And, importantly, to prevent climate-fit people, like the villagers in Laos, from becoming climate-weak. But it will require strong local action, good governance, and well-planned climate adaptation programs in the poor countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, where the climate-weak live — and the most deaths are likely to occur.


Gaia Vince, the former news editor of Nature, is a freelance science writer whose work has appeared in The Guardian, The Times (UK), New Scientist, Seed, Science, and on the BBC. She is currently traveling internationally looking at the social and environmental impacts of climate change.

SHARE: Tweet | Digg | | Reddit | Mixx | Facebook | Stumble Upon


Being "climate-fit" or "climate-weak" is another way to call being RESILIENT or not. In other words, being ready to adapt ourselves, our communities, towns and cities, for the imminent climate changes.

There are many groups that have been developing guidelines, indicators and evaluations to check "vulnerability" levels, what actions we can take, what do we need to do to be prepared, etc.

Nowadays, I do believe Resiliency efforts and programs should replace those focusing
on sustainability.

And this is not only for the poor developing countries. I am afraid that many over-developed, rich countries, are more vulnerable, or "climate-weak" as the author says, than other countries.

Posted by norberto rodriguez dela vega on 02 Nov 2009

This article looks at Third World communities with a respect that is rare but welcome. If more of us conserved like the people of Laos, it would be good. Based on her experiences, the author is in a good position to spearhead global strategies for climate-fitness.
Posted by TRB on 02 Nov 2009

As someone who lives in a climate-vulnerable archipelago (the Philippines), I can't help but fear for our people. Filipinos have these traits that you mentioned - "resilience, ingenuity, and flexibility" - in abundance. The recent widespread flood deaths in Manila, however, point to the fact that we might be lacking in the 4th crucial factor - good governance.
Posted by Environment News on 04 Nov 2009

I can't help but notice that this article overlooks an element of crucial importance. Enormously powerful forces such as corporations coming from outside the community are often responsible for destroying local 'resilience.' Perhaps this is what was meant by poor governance, but that is not clear from the article. The general tone of the article verges on saying that it is their own fault if locals' lives and homes are lost to global warming.

Posted by wili on 06 Nov 2009

The societies that seem to be doing it best at the moment are those who are not very technologically developed. It leads me to believe that not even carbon trading can help "developed countries" take all of this seriously enough.

Posted by trusts on 07 Nov 2009

I've been looking for an approach to global environment that is seamless and holistic, and that puts Earth's wholeness before individual geopolitical units such as nations. Gaia Vince's article -- and her name fits with what I'm envisioning -- provides tools for bringing the world together around the issue of "climate fitness."

She has identified "resilience, ingenuity, and flexibility," as well as "good governance," as prerequisites for climate fitness toward adapting to the inexorable challenges wrought by climate change. How can we go further?

We should be able to rate all nations' climate fitness. There are so many academic programs that legions of students could be brought together to work on this rating. If we take a large overview of what's already being done, perhaps with too-narrow purviews, we'd probably be surprised at how many resources are already in place to effect this global rating.

Mapping Nations on Google Earth:
There must already be Google Earth maps that could be assembled in such a way as to allow people everywhere to observe each nation's resources for climate fitness. People everywhere could be able to make choices or take actions that maintain and promote climate fitness at home and abroad.

It's quite possible that Ms. Vince is already working in this vein, and it would be nice to hear what thoughts she might have on the subject.

Posted by TRB on 08 Nov 2009


"The societies that seem to be doing it best at the moment are those who are not very technologically developed. It leads me to believe that not even carbon trading can help "developed countries" take all of this seriously enough."

Yes. The Third World points to the future. Developed nations (the West) are also highly capitalistic, which means that making money tromps any other values. Yet, the material power of the West is overwhelming the Third World. Yet again, this implies that the West must lead. Which means it must somehow transform itself. With its technological might and global reach, imagine what the West could achieve if it adopted lifestyle patterns of Laos. It would be like the Third World on steroids.

Posted by TRB on 12 Nov 2009

Kind of odd to read this and not see a reference to Elinor Ostrom or Jared Diamond. Their work seems almost compulsory to understanding these issues.

Posted by John D. Wilson on 12 Nov 2009

John D. Wilson on 12 Nov 2009

"Kind of odd to read this and not see a reference to Elinor Ostrom or Jared Diamond. Their work seems almost compulsory to understanding these issues."

The reference to Elinor Ostrom was helpful. Her work as described on Wikipedia touched on a field know as Collective Action (among several others). A section entitled Collective Action and Climate Change linked to the Stern Report on the economic projections for addressing climate change, which was also useful. But this is academic stuff way out of reach for the masses. I'm not sure how Gaia Vince's straightforward essay would benefit by bringing in this woefully complex academic perspective. Is the academy so caught up in itself that it is incapable of interacting with the real world in a truly change-making fashion? Jared Diamond's presentations on TV seem much simpler, but how can countries meeting in Copenhagen actually apply this?

Average people on the street are smart and good enough to ignite into action upon getting the right inspiration. But where is the spark to ignite them? If we agree that dealing with climate change requires universal paradigm shifting, the mysteries of the academic world don't seem to be the answer.

Posted by TRB on 15 Nov 2009

People all over the world are being deeply affected by somethıng that many of us don't really consider in our day-to-day lives. In Peru, whole families of farmers depend on the water running off glaciers and into rivers. But because of the chanğes in temperature caused by global carbon emissions, the glaciers are retreating and the rivers are running dry. The farmers live on the crops they grow in the möuntains and the yarn they spin from the coats of their alpaca herds. But they can no longer predict the seasons and the alpacas are leaving – it is almost as if they can sense the disaster faster than we can.

Posted by estetik on 20 Nov 2009



Republican Who Led EPA Urges Confronting Trump on Climate
William K. Reilly, a Republican and one-time head of the EPA, is dismayed that a climate change skeptic has been named to lead his former agency. But in a Yale e360 interview, he insists environmental progress can be made despite resistance from the Trump administration.

The Legacy of the Man Who Changed Our View of Nature
The 19th-century German scientist Alexander von Humboldt popularized the concept that the natural world is interconnected. In a Yale e360 interview, biographer Andrea Wulf explains how Humboldt’s vision helped create modern environmentalism.

A Drive to Save Saharan Oases As Climate Change Takes a Toll
From Morocco to Libya, the desert oases of the Sahara's Maghreb region are disappearing as temperatures rise and rainfall decreases. Facing daunting odds, local residents are employing traditional water conservation techniques to try to save these ancient ecosystems.

An Unusually Warm Arctic Year: Sign of Future Climate Turmoil?
This year will almost certainly go down as the warmest on record in the Arctic, with autumn temperatures soaring 36 degrees F above normal. In a Yale e360 interview, climatologist Jennifer Francis explains why a swiftly warming Arctic may have profound effects on global weather.

How Warming Is ThreateningThe Genetic Diversity of Species
Research on stoneflies in Glacier National Park indicates that global warming is reducing the genetic diversity of some species, compromising their ability to evolve as conditions change. These findings have major implications for how biodiversity will be affected by climate change.


Donate to Yale Environment 360