Menu
29 Oct 2012

How Fishing Gear is Killing Whales in the North Atlantic

Researchers have been documenting the deadly threat that fishing lines and ropes pose to large whales that become entangled in them. Now, new studies are pointing to another disturbing fact: the ensnared whales endure enormous pain and prolonged suffering.
By rebecca kessler

In early August, a small minke whale washed up on a beach in Chatham, Massachusetts. It was less than nine months old, not even weaned, and the cause of death soon became clear to Michael Moore, a veterinarian and biologist with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, who came to perform a necropsy. Fishing line snarled the whale’s snout, threading in and out of its baleen. Skull-bone fractures indicated that it had struggled in the rope underwater. Still, death had come fairly quickly.

“It had a pretty rotten half an hour before it succumbed. But that’s not so bad as a pretty rotten six months,” says Moore. That’s how long he and several colleagues determined it takes on average for at least one species of large whales to die when they become lethally tangled in fishing gear. Big whales are usually strong enough to break free of gear they encounter, but they often carry some of it away with them, bound to limb or jaw. Rope and nets often do the snarling and can bring other types of gear along for the ride, including hooks, buoys, traps, even anchors and other marine debris. Over time, the gear exacts a painful toll. It can slice flesh, deform bone, amputate flukes, and restrict breathing, eating, and swimming as it drags through the water.

View gallery
Province Center for Coastal Studies Whale Entanglement

PCCS/NOAA Permit #932-1905
An entangled whale off the Canadian coast in the North Atlantic.
Moore and other scientists say entanglement poses a serious obstacle to the recovery of endangered whales on the U.S. east coast, especially North Atlantic right whales, which may number as few as 444. But in a series of recent papers, Moore has also called attention to the pain that entanglement inflicts on individual whales.

“There are two questions,” Moore says. “Does it or does it not impact the conservation of the species or the population or the stock? And, is the individual animal in welfare extremis. They’re both important arguments, but I think it’s valuable to look at them separately,” he says. “Quite independent of the cost to the population there’s a cost to the individual that as a veterinarian I grieve over.”

That grief and frustration with efforts to prevent entanglement are propelling Moore into some surprising territory. He has argued that whales killed intentionally by harpoon meet far faster and more humane deaths than lethally entangled ones — even though the whaling industry has been criticized for having perhaps the least humane killing methods of any commercial slaughter. The whaling nation of Norway has made hay of this point before the International Whaling Commission (IWC), sparking international attention to the issue.

Entanglement has become a fact of life for large whales. Scientists examining scars on whale skin estimate that 82 percent of North Atlantic right whales and about half of endangered humpbacks between Cape Cod and Nova Scotia have become entangled at least once. Each year an unknown number die. Many of them manage to free themselves. Others receive human help — ideally from trained disentanglement teams because the work is very risky for both the rescuers and the whales.

A paper led by Moore’s graduate student Julie van der Hoop and published this month in Conservation Biology examined all of the 1,762 documented deaths and serious injuries that occurred between 1970 and 2009 in eight
A study of whale deaths showed that the biggest killer was entanglement in fishing gear.
large whale species in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Entanglement in fishing gear was the biggest killer — even bigger than natural causes or collisions with ships — accounting for 43 percent of the cases with a known cause of death. Federal agencies determine the number of individual marine mammals that can be killed without harming their populations; the paper in Conservation Biology found that for both North Atlantic right whales and humpbacks, human-caused deaths regularly exceeded that number.

While entanglement receives the most scrutiny on the North American east coast, scientists are certain the problem is global, albeit severely underreported in many areas. The best estimate is that each year some 300,000 cetaceans (including whales, dolphins, and porpoises) wind up as bycatch worldwide — meaning they are unintentionally killed or seriously injured by the fishing industry.

Numbers tell one part of the story; whale carcasses tell another. In a 2011 paper complete with dozens of grisly forensic photographs, Moore and several colleagues catalogued entanglement injuries in 21 unfortunate baleen whales. Lines worked their way through one North Atlantic right whale’s flipper and embedded three inches deep in the bone. Over a four-month period, lines scraped off a five-foot-wide layer of blubber clear across another’s back, exposing the shoulder blades. The rope was so tight workers heard it snap when they cut it off the body. Ultimately the whales in the study, published in Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, died from drowning, starvation, infection, hemorrhage, or gross tissue damage inflicted by the gear.

Moore’s 2006 paper that found it typically took large whales six months to die once entangled caught the attention of Egil Ole Øen, a veterinarian who advises
Lines worked through one right whale’s flipper and embedded three inches deep in the bone.
the whaling industry and indigenous hunters on humane killing methods. Øen, a Norwegian delegate to the IWC, brought entanglement up at the commission’s 2007 meeting and challenged the U.S. government to explain its stance on the issue. Øen says Moore’s work “gave a key... to walk into this very serious issue in a scientific manner.”

The ensuing discussion prompted the IWC to hold two international workshops to develop recommendations for how the commission should address entanglement and how its member nations should respond to entangled whales. One thread of discussion, raised by Øen, is whether to euthanize lethally entangled whales that cannot be freed. Moore, who helped develop whale-sedation techniques to make disentanglement easier, was contracted to review potential euthanizing methods. A bit ironically, the most humane one is arguably the whaler’s grenade-bearing harpoon, though that is unlikely ever to be permitted in U.S. waters, he says.

View gallery
Province Center for Coastal Studies Whale Entanglement

PCCS/NOAA Permit #932-1905
Rescuers free an entangled humpback whale that had been anchored in place for three days.
Though still theoretical, euthanasia of large whales at sea is a tricky subject. On one hand, as Øen contends, it could spare whales months of distress. On the other, when it comes to the survival of endangered species like the North Atlantic right whale, every last animal matters. “This is where the lines between conservation and the ethical treatment of animals become blurred,” says Scott Landry, who directs the East Coast’s main disentanglement program at the Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies. “I really would not want to regret ending the life of an animal that is so incredibly rare. And would I rather it just swim out in the ocean suffering for months and months on end? I’d rather have neither!”

Everyone involved agrees that neither euthanasia nor disentanglement will fix the problem and that prevention is key. But finding a solution has not been easy. Obstacles include an inability to test the effectiveness of new gear, the difficulty of pinpointing where, how, or even how many entanglements occur, as well as strong resistance to new regulation by some quarters of the fishing industry. “Get rid of the rope and you get rid of the entanglement problem overnight,” says Landry, adding that unfortunately thousands of fishermen’s livelihoods are at stake and “we don’t currently understand how you could go fishing without rope.”

Along the East Coast, gillnet and trap or pot fishing gear — and lobster gear in particular — appear to be the worst culprits. Existing U.S. regulations under the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP) have focused on restricting this gear in critical areas and modifying it so whales can more easily avoid or break free of it.

Many observers are skeptical that those rules are working. The recent Conservation Biology paper shows that the likelihood of a whale becoming entangled rose between 1990 and 2009, despite new Canadian and U.S. regulations during that period. But one of the most important regulations to date, requiring trap and pot fishermen to use rope that sinks to the ground rather than floats to
‘There’s not a single lobsterman in Maine who doesn’t feel sick to his stomach to know that’s our gear.’
connect one trap to another, took effect too recently for the paper to evaluate.

The gear restrictions and modifications have been expensive, onerous, and even dangerous for lobstermen, says Patrice McCarron, executive director of the Maine Lobstermen’s Association, which has collaborated with scientists to study the problem. “There’s not a single lobsterman in Maine who doesn’t feel sick to his stomach to know that that’s our gear,” says McCarron, “They want to be doing the right thing,” she says, but it’s hard to know if their sacrifices will pay off.

The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and an advisory group of about 60 scientists, fishermen, government officials, and conservationists — which includes McCarron and two scientists from the Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies — are now considering how best to reduce the amount of fishing line running vertically between the seafloor and the ocean surface. A so-called vertical line rule is slated for 2014.

MORE FROM YALE e360

A Defender of World’s Whales
Sees Only a Tenuous Recovery

Roger Payne A Defender of World’s Whales Sees Only a Tenuous Recovery
Biologist Roger Payne played a key role in helping end the wholesale slaughter of whales. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Payne discusses the mysteries of these legendary marine mammals and the threats they continue to face.
READ THE e360 REPORT
David Gouveia, who coordinates the advisory group for NMFS’s Northeast Regional Office, acknowledges the frustration of all involved. Nevertheless, Gouveia says he believes the sinking-groundline and vertical-line rules represent a two-pronged approach that should be given a chance to take hold. He also points out that from a conservation perspective, North Atlantic right whale numbers have been ticking up each year, from at least 291 animals in 2003 to at least 444 in 2012.

For his part, Moore says he is sympathetic to the fishermen’s plight. But he remains unconvinced that anything besides a major transformation of the fishing industry to remove much of the rope from the water will solve the entanglement conundrum, and is increasingly doubtful that the regulatory or legal system will bring that about. Instead, he looks to seafood consumers. If they knew what fishing gear does to whales, he maintains, they’d pressure the industry to change its ways pronto, much as they did in the 1980s when it came to light that thousands of dolphins were being mangled and killed each year by the tuna fishery.

“I’m not a vegetarian. I’m quite happy to see animals being suitably consumed and utilized,” Moore says. “But I don't see taking six months to die whilst being wrapped up in rope as being an acceptable part of that.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Rebecca Kessler is a freelance science and environmental journalist based in Providence, Rhode Island. A former senior editor at Natural History, her work has been published by ClimateCentral.org, Conservation, Discover, Natural History, ScienceNOW, ScienceInsider, and Environmental Health Perspectives.

SHARE: Tweet | Digg | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Mixx | Facebook | Stumble Upon

COMMENTS


Regarding euthanasia, if you were partially bound and had to drag an 'albatross' around but could still eat and breed, would you still want to live? Well, hell yes! So do they. I'd say a lot of life is unfortunately painful, whether we want to accept it or not, and we each must 'carry our own load' so to speak, and prevail over the challenges set in front of us.

Help these whales? You betcha! Absolutely, if humanly possible. But if we can't remove an item, just let them be, don't kill them. No, it's not pleasant to watch, but our watching isn't what's important, their struggle is.

Posted by Mark LaRoux on 30 Oct 2012


I agree with everyone's opinions in this article that says euthanasia is not the way! I also see how the fisheries would be having a hard time with this problem because there really is no way to fish without using rope. However, couldn't you put some sort of tracker that's either GPS or sends some sort of signal that could be picked up on SONAR or some other system of the same sort? I know that this doesn't necessarily fix the problem but wouldn't it help? I realize that it's dangerous for the rescue teams to go in and cut the lines but part of the problem is that these magnificent mammals are getting caught in these ropes and have no way out and the rope ends up slowly causing a problem that eventually leads to death in a six month time span.

Well if the nets had some sort of tracking device would it not make it easier for rescue teams to track down these whales and help free them? Obviously, it doesn't fix the problem .... just wouldn't it help? Or is that already been thought of and is either already applied, being applied or is there an issue that goes along with that idea?

Posted by Christina on 30 Oct 2012


There are a couple of good films coming out soon, covering the subject of marine debris (especially plastic) and its impacts - not only on marine life, but also on human health:

http://www.plasticoceans.net/

http://www.trashedfilm.com/

Posted by Rosalind Savage on 01 Nov 2012


Synthetic fishing gear should be eliminated.

We need to be using natural fibre ropes and nets that lose their structural integrity much faster when lost.

This probably wouldn't save many whales caught in active fishing gear, though it would reduce ghost fishing gear entanglements.

In the meantime tackle plastic pollution with your own Two Hands. Check out: www.facebook.com/twohandsproject

Posted by Paul Sharp on 14 Nov 2012


We agree that using natural fiber rope should be encouraged, and believe that a new type of fishing rope that disintegrates after 3-4 weeks should be developed. It would cost more than synthetic ropes, so the government and conservation agencies should contribute funding to fisherman using this more humane and environmentally safe type of rope. This would further encourage its use and phase out the use of harmful synthetics.

Posted by Kellick & Elizabet on 05 Jan 2013



 

RELATED ARTICLES


A North Atlantic Mystery: Case of the Missing Whales
Endangered North Atlantic right whales are disappearing from customary feeding grounds off the U.S. and Canadian coasts and appearing in large numbers in other locations, leaving scientists to wonder if shifts in climate may be behind the changes.
READ MORE

No Refuge: Tons of Trash Covers The Remote Shores of Alaska
A marine biologist traveled to southwestern Alaska in search of ocean trash that had washed up along a magnificent coast rich in fish, birds, and other wildlife. He and his colleagues found plenty of trash – as much as a ton of garbage per mile on some beaches.
READ MORE

How Mussel Farming Could Help to Clean Fouled Waters
Along the shores of New York Harbor, scientists are investigating whether this ubiquitous bivalve can be grown in urban areas as a way of cleansing coastal waters of sewage, fertilizers, and other pollutants.
READ MORE

A Key Experiment to Probe the Future of Our Acidifying Oceans
In a Swedish fjord, European researchers are conducting an ambitious experiment aimed at better understanding how ocean acidification will affect marine life. Ultimately, these scientists hope to determine which species might win and which might lose in a more acidic ocean.
READ MORE

A Leading Marine Biologist Works to Create a ‘Wired Ocean’
Stanford University scientist Barbara Block heads a program that has placed satellite tags on thousands of sharks, bluefin tuna, and other marine predators to better understand their life cycles. Now, using data available on mobile devices, she hopes to enlist public support for protecting these threatened creatures.
READ MORE


SEARCH


Donate to Yale Environment 360


ABOUT

Menu

SUPPORT E360

Menu

TOPICS

Menu

DEPARTMENTS

Menu

HOME PAGE

Menu