22 Mar 2012: Report

Can Reforming the Farm Bill
Help Change U.S. Agriculture?

For decades, farm bills in the U.S. Congress have supported large-scale agriculture. But with the 2012 Farm Bill now up for debate, advocates say seismic shifts in the way the nation views food production may lead to new policies that tilt more toward local, sustainable agriculture.

by jim robbins

More than ever, U.S. corn is king. Across the Midwest, farmers are expanding their corn acreage to take advantage of record high prices. More corn will be planted this year than any since World War II, with 94 million acres under cultivation, up from 78 million in 2006.

While the boom may be good for the farmer, it takes a steep toll on the environment. The planting is changing the countryside as farmers plow fencerow to fencerow, eliminating trees, land in conservation programs, and riparian areas. Meanwhile, cheap, federally subsidized corn is used to make high-fructose corn syrup, which is added to thousands of products and is implicated in many chronic illnesses that plague Americans. Experts say it’s an important factor in obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and even cancer.

All this riles Dan Imhoff to no end. A writer in Sonoma County, California, Imhoff is one of the activists leading the charge against agribusiness as
Advocates believe that the time to substantively change the nation’s food policy has arrived.
usual. His primary tool? The 2012 Farm Bill, which is now being drafted in Congress. Environmentalists and public health advocates have battled special interests over the Farm Bill in the past, but this year, because of burgeoning interest in all things food, they believe the time to substantively change the nation’s food policy has arrived.

Imhoff, food journalist Michael Pollan, and others have scheduled teach-ins around the country to drum up support for changes to the bill. The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition has sponsored a farmer fly-in to Washington, D.C., to lobby for changes in the bill. Chellie Pingree, an organic farmer and Democratic member of Congress from Maine has, along with 68 co-sponsors, introduced The Local Farms, Food and Jobs Act, which they want included as a section of the new Farm Bill. The new provisions would tilt farm policies more toward local, sustainable agriculture. In addition, more than 100 public health groups are working on changes to the Farm Bill.

All this activity reflects the seismic shifts that have rocked the political landscape around agriculture since the last Farm Bill was passed in 2008. Pollan, Imhoff, and many others say that things at last seem propitious for real change in the nation’s system of industrialized agriculture.

“More and more people are beginning to realize where their food comes from, who their farmer is, and what he grows,” said reform advocate Richard Rominger, a former deputy secretary at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, former director of the California Department of Agriculture, and a family
‘It’s good that more people are interested in the Farm Bill rather than just a few farmers and their lobbyists,’ says one expert.
farmer near Davis, California. “That’s good. And it’s a good thing that more people are interested in the Farm Bill rather than just a few farmers and their lobbyists.”

Farming may not immediately come to mind as one of America’s biggest environmental issues, but it is, and that’s the prime interest of Imhoff, who has just published the second edition of his book, Food Fight: The Citizen’s Guide to the Next Food and Farm Bill. Farming and ranching are the largest single land use in the country — with 20 percent of the land used for crops and 26 percent for pasture and range — and the methods of large-scale agribusiness take a heavy toll.

“They are expanding into areas that shouldn’t be farmed,” Imhoff says. “It’s encouraging erosion and heavy pesticide and herbicide use. They are plowing right up to their back door. It’s turning the whole Midwest into a cornfield. And the crazy thing is we aren’t eating [much of] it, we are feeding it to cattle or making it into fuel.”

The world’s largest ocean dead zone — an area the size of New Jersey devoid of aquatic life — is in the Gulf of Mexico. The leading causes are the synthetic nitrogen and phosphorous used to fertilize corn and soybeans in the Midwest, and animal waste, which runs off fields to the Mississippi River and on to the Gulf. Meanwhile, the Ogallala Aquifer — the sprawling underground reservoir of fresh water that stretches from South Dakota to Texas — has been significantly depleted, largely because of the Corn Belt’s unquenchable thirst. Herbicides and pesticides mix with water that percolates back into the aquifer.

A study released earlier this year says the planting of insecticide-coated seed corn may be one of the main culprits in Colony Collapse Disorder, the mass die-off of bees. And industrialized agriculture is an important contributor to
If you want to reform an upside-down food system, ‘you can’t ignore the Farm Bill,’ says journalist Michael Pollan.
greenhouse gas emissions. If alternative methods were adopted, however, they could become part of the solution.

If you want to reform this upside-down food system, “you can’t ignore the Farm Bill, for it’s where the decisions are made,” says Pollan, the author who laid bare the workings of the corn industry in his bestselling book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma. As the bill is usually written “it doesn’t push it in the direction it needs to go, to become more sustainable.”

The obtuse, acronym-laden, nearly 2,000-page Farm Bill comes up for renewal every five to seven years, and for decades was written by special interests and farm-state politicians, with very little public input. This despite the fact that it is an expensive piece of legislation with wide ramifications: The proposed bill — if, indeed, it passes this election year — may cost $265 billion over five years. [Some two-thirds of the spending in the bill would go to food and nutrition programs, such as food stamps; 22 percent would go to supporting commodity crops, including corn; and 9 percent would go to conservation programs.]

One of the top conservation programs is the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, or EQIP, designed to offer farmers financial and technical help to improve the environmental conditions on their farms. Another initiative, the Conservation Reserve Program, pays farmers to idle some of their crop acreage to increase wildlife habitat and prevent erosion.

Pollan, Imhoff, and other reformers believe that more people than ever want to make farming more sustainable, and want more money from the Farm Bill to nurture responsible agriculture. When Pollan gives a talk on college campuses or at other venues around the country these days, it’s not unusual to have hundreds of people turn out. In the last few years, people have realized not only do they subsidize large-scale farming directly through taxpayer subsidies, but also indirectly through health care costs and damage to the environment.

Until the last Farm Bill, for example, organic farming received just $3 million a year for research. The 2008 Farm Bill raised it to $20 million, but that is
‘This is going to encourage something that’s already happening — local, small-scale farms,’ says one congresswoman.
still miniscule compared to the $307 billion total funding of that bill. Corn subsidies alone amounted to some $80 billion between 1995 and 2010, according to the Environmental Working Group, a pro-reform non-profit.

“There’s always progressive things that promote local food and farm-to-school programs, or vouchers for produce,” in the Farm Bill, says Pollan. “But they are crumbs compared to the commodity subsidies. They don’t add up to a billion dollars.”

Rep. Pingree’s bill seeks to change some of the priorities to favor sustainable farms. Pingree is herself an organic farmer on Penobscot Bay in Maine, where she grows vegetables, meat, and eggs, much of it used for meals at her inn, Nebo Lodge. Her bill would make it easier for small farms to get loans, help new farmers begin farming, provide more research for organic crops, and provide farmers with funding as they transition from conventional agriculture to organic. It would also expand conservation programs. An emphasis on local farms would also reduce the fuel costs and carbon emissions associated with trucking or flying food around the world.

“It’s about more sustainable farming practices,” Pingree says. Local family farms “are not going to be a 12,000-acre expanse of land. This is going to encourage something that’s already happening out there — local, small-scale farms.”

Meanwhile, there is a move afoot to reduce direct payments to farmers, which former Deputy Secretary of Agriculture Romenger believes should be the first order of business. Direct payments are a check written to commodity
‘Millions of people are waking up to the fact that the food system is in trouble,’ says on advocate.
farmers simply for farming, no matter what price they receive for their crop. In 2010, an estimated $4 billion to $6 billion was paid out, according to calculations by different agencies and groups. The program is widely criticized and, in a time of budget cutbacks and high grain prices, likely to shrink. Some of the money, Pingree says, could go to farmers of fruits and vegetable, which don’t qualify for direct payments, or to fund conservation programs, which often are the first to experience funding cuts.

Farm organizations are watching the growing interest in their industry with pride and concern. Dale Moore, deputy executive director for the American Farm Bureau, contends that the blame laid at agriculture’s doorstep for environmental problems is overblown. “Every producer I visit with says, ‘I’ve got to take care of my soil or my cattle, not just this year but year after year,’” he says. “If they don’t, they won’t be in business because Mother Nature will take them out.” Where problems such as nutrient overload exist, farmers are “leading the way in the recovery process,” Moore says.

“It’s not that we shouldn’t support farmers,” at all, says Imhoff. “We should. But they have a social obligation. We need robust habitat protection plans for a healthy rural environment — with clean water, healthy soil, and wildlife habitat.”

One of the innovative 2008 farm bill conservation programs that has gained support from environmentalists, ranchers, and biologists is the Sage Grouse Initiative. A ground bird with an unusual, showy courtship ritual, sage grouse live in the sagebrush ecosystem of the West. Once, 16 million existed


The Other Inconvenient Truth:
The Crisis in Global Land Use

Land Use
As the international community focuses on climate change as the great challenge of our era, it is ignoring another looming problem — the global crisis in land use. With agricultural practices causing massive ecological impact, writes Jonathan Foley, the world must find new ways to feed its burgeoning population and launch a “Greener” Revolution.
in the U.S., but they now number about 200,000 and are declining, victims of farming, ranching, housing, and energy development. The birds appeared destined for an endangered species designation. But state and federal officials, worried about the political ramifications of a listing, came up with a novel, science-based plan to rush tens millions of dollars in federal Farm Bill funding for habitat protection and enhancement on private farms and ranches. Ranchers will get funding to make improvements on their land, as long as they meet the goal of recovering the birds. The scope and aggressive nature of the plan has impressed environmentalists and politicians, but it’s still too early to assess the results.

With a little help from a reformed Farm Bill, similar initiatives could spread, advocates say.

“Millions of people are waking up to the fact that the food system is in trouble,” says Imhoff. “More people are engaged than ever. They realize what’s at stake.”

POSTED ON 22 Mar 2012 IN Biodiversity Climate Oceans Policy & Politics Science & Technology Africa Asia North America 


Unfortunately, the authors quoted in this article, or maybe the author himself, seem unconcerned about the specifics required to understand the environmental consequences of human actions. Specifically, they fail to understand that “pesticide” means anything used to control one or more pest organisms. Soap is a pesticide. When they use “pesticide” they seem to mean “insecticide”, but is that what they mean?

In addition, the “broad-brush” treatment of “organic agriculture” and suggestion that it will lead to sustainable production is questionable at best. One of the greatest environmental improvements associated with farming in the last few decades was the introduction of “no-till agriculture” which relies on herbicides. No-till agriculture has stopped hundreds of thousands of tons of top soil from being lost annually. Unfortunately, much of the soil that is lost ends up in waterways leading to additional environmental problems. Plowing and tilling, the foundation for much “organic agriculture,” lead to soil loss (wind and water), and the degradation of acquatic ecosystems.

There may be value in “organic production” but that remains to be seen. I would have enjoyed an article that presented factual information on this subject as opposed to one based on belief.

Posted by Dr. R.A. Lautenschlager on 22 Mar 2012

It is easy to criticise modern, conventional agriculture and highlight the environmental damage that occurs as a result. However the alternatives that are currently available are not viable in large-scale operations in most areas. Advocating for a local, smallholder approach is key for the development of these alternatives. We must remember that farmers are not out for pure exploitation of the land many of course care deeply about taking care of their land because it is their income and livelihood.

The political systems that have led to the development of such subsidy-reliant farming must be changed if we are to move towards a more sustainable approach. In order to do this we must involve as many different stakeholders as possible and keep the debate one that does not polarize opinions. It's easy to paint a rosy picture of organic farms, local produce, and ways of farming that are indeed more beneficial for the environment.

But the question remains can it feed us? Hopefully reforming the farm bill can lead to changes in the status quo, since it can be said that our current way of doing things will not work in the long term. This has wide-ranging consequences since our choice of crop has effects throughout the world (i.e. the growth of soy production in Brazil due to the growth of corn production in the USA). These decisions must be made with regards to long-term agricultural and environmental health, instead of thinking about short term gain. This is really the only way to proceed.

Posted by E.P. on 22 Mar 2012

Before WWII everybody was "organic" and most farmers and consumers were lucky to live 60 years (the reason Social Security didn't begin until 62, because the Progressives thought the cash would go unclaimed, but they could look like they cared).

Reform is absloutely needed, but will do no good until a majority of honest legislators are elected to congress. Until then the Family Farm is literally being burdened to extinction.

Only then can the three issues of Fiscal Balance, Lower Taxes and Less Regulation be addressed that would actually help farmers.

To quote John F. Kenendy: "The farmer is the only man in the economy who buys everything at retail, sells everything at wholesale and pays the freight both ways."

Paul Verdegaal, Full time Extension Advisor/Part Time Farmer

Posted by Paul Verdegaal on 22 Mar 2012

Although I don’t necessarily agree with the author here that what’s needed on the Farm Bill is more direct support for local, organic foods, I certainly don’t agree with the other comments here.

I wish Mr. Robbins would have written about the Farm Bill’s distortion of food markets and food prices and the unintended but severe consequences of that, including exacerbating global hunger. I’m glad he at least mentioned that if we’re really concerned about spending, why are we handing out so much cash disguised as farm/economic policy? Billions in DIRECT cash to farmers, just for farming? Surely a consequence of 2 senators per state, and justified by supposedly helping “ma and pa” farmers – which now are few and far between in the farm industry – in part because of the Farm Bill.

Posted by A.L. on 22 Mar 2012

Bravo, Dan Imhoff!!!

Actually, there is a simple and effective way to restore the Nature, better than EQIP or CRP. That is the tradition Organic Plant Farming. OPF is the most efficient way to use our limited resources to secure healthy and nutrient foods while mitigating climate change. A proposal to urge subsidies to farmers/ranchers who transition in OPF in 2012 Farm Bill can serve as an incentive for compliance and support U.S. policies in Health and Climate.

Please visit: http://www.concernedcitizensnetwork.org/category/take-action/

Posted by R.S. on 23 Mar 2012

It truly is a shame if Congress is allowed to continue its war against small family farmers with the highly financially discriminatory crop insurance scheme. This scheme which guarantees the greatest probability of the greatest income to the largest farmers creates impossible financial competition for most small farmers. In other words Congress gives so much more to the haves that those with less are unable to have any chance of competing in the farm business. Crony capitalism is the term that describes federal crop insurance.

Federal crop insurance is a government scheme that uses the taxpayers’ contributions and government resources to disproportionately guarantee greater wealth to those with the greatest probability of the greatest wealth. In exchange for highly subsidized premiums the wealthiest farmers or those with the greatest probability of the greatest wealth (generally those with the most acres controlled or owned) receive nearly bullet proof investment and profit insurance worth many times what smaller farmers can obtain. (Fair market values of investment /profit guarantee received.)

In short, government is guaranteeing the most to those who have the most. This granting of overwhelming prosperity in exchange for highly subsidized premiums allows the largest and already most financially competitive farm operators the ability to make sure most smaller farmers can see the lights of the uncoming train financially.

Posted by splined on 23 Mar 2012

Some fact checking is in order:

"The world’s largest ocean dead zone — an area the size of New Jersey devoid of aquatic life — is in the Gulf of Mexico. "

The largest hypoxic zone is not in the Gulf. The hypoxic zone in the Gulf is in no way "dead".

There are problems with our current agriculture system and fisheries however we cannot fix them if we exaggerate reality.

LSU's Dr. Cowan wrote about the what we know and what is widely claimed with respect to the Gulf


"Ironically, on the same day that the Washington Post published a story on the “Dead Zone,” which included a statement claiming that “there is an area on the Louisiana shelf the size of Massachusetts where you can’t catch any fish or shrimp”, a group of scientists, including a member of my research group, were on the shelf sampling in the hypoxic zone. Samples were collected with high resolution imaging sonar, and data were ground-truthed by biological samples collected in trawls. Several species of ground fishes and a penaeid shrimp (Atlantic croaker, cut- lassfish, Atlantic bumpers, and pink shrimp) were abundant on the bottom in < 2 mg L-1, and the water column contained post-larval and juvenile anchovies (several species) and At- lactic bumpers........"

Any scientist even those that think nutrients play a role in the Gulf hypoxic zone but have the audacity to question how big a role come under attack and branded "skeptics."

The Gulf has enough problems without the need to make things up or to hype the condition. Dr. Cowan warns that when science allows itself to exaggerate the truth for a good cause it damages itself. Cowan warns quoting Roger Pielke Jr:

"In many instances science has become little more than a mechanism for marketing competing political agendas, and scientists have become leading members of the advertising campaigns”. Exactly, and this truth is very ugly indeed. As a community of advertisers, we should not be surprised when managers and policy makers who need objective, defensible, scientific answers no longer solicit our inputs."

Posted by Patrick Moffitt on 24 Mar 2012

Comments have been closed on this feature.
Jim Robbins is a veteran journalist based in Helena, Montana. He has written for the New York Times, Conde Nast Traveler, and numerous other publications. His latest book, The Man Who Planted Trees: Lost Groves, Champion Trees, and an Urgent Plan to Save the Planet, will be published in April. In earlier articles for Yale Environment 360, he explored a great forest die-off occurring in western North America and reported on efforts to kill the Keystone XL pipeline.



On Slopes of Kilimanjaro, Shift
In Climate Hits Coffee Harvest

Rising temperatures and changing precipitation are taking a toll on coffee farms worldwide, including the plantations around Mount Kilimanjaro. If the world hopes to sustain its two billion cup-a-day habit, scientists say, new climate-resilient species of coffee must be developed.

The Methane Riddle: What Is
Causing the Rise in Emissions?

The cause of the rapid increase in methane emissions since 2007 has puzzled scientists. But new research finds some surprising culprits in the methane surge and shows that fossil-fuel sources have played a much larger role over time than previously estimated.

New Green Challenge: How to
Grow More Food on Less Land

If the world is to have another Green Revolution to feed its soaring population, it must be far more sustainable than the first one. That means finding ways to boost yields with less fertilizer and rethinking the way food is distributed.

Can Data-Driven Agriculture
Help Feed a Hungry World?

Agribusinesses are increasingly using computer databases to enable farmers to grow crops more efficiently and with less environmental impact. Experts hope this data, detailing everything from water use to crop yields, can also help the developing world grow more food.

For U.S. Tribes, a Movement to
Revive Native Foods and Lands

On ancestral lands, the Fond du Lac band in Minnesota is planting wild rice and restoring wetlands damaged by dams, industry, and logging. Their efforts are part of a growing trend by Native Americans to bring back traditional food sources and heal scarred landscapes.


MORE IN Reports

As Chinese Luxury Market Grows,
An Upsurge in Tiger Killings in India

by sharon guynup
Poachers killed more tigers in the forests of India in 2016 than any year in the last 15. The spike is linked to demand for tiger parts in China, where the endangered animal’s bones and skins are regarded as exotic luxury items.

New Look at Rivers Reveals
The Toll of Human Activity

by jim robbins
A recent outbreak of a deadly fish parasite on the Yellowstone River may have seemed unremarkable. But a new wave of research shows the episode was likely linked to the cumulative impact of human activities that essentially weakened the Yellowstone’s "immune system."

On Slopes of Kilimanjaro, Shift
In Climate Hits Coffee Harvest

by daniel grossman
Rising temperatures and changing precipitation are taking a toll on coffee farms worldwide, including the plantations around Mount Kilimanjaro. If the world hopes to sustain its two billion cup-a-day habit, scientists say, new climate-resilient species of coffee must be developed.

Aimed at Refugees, Fences Are
Threatening European Wildlife

by jim o'donnell
A flood of migrants from the Middle East and Africa has prompted governments in the Balkans to erect hundreds of miles of border fences. Scientists say the expanding network of barriers poses a serious threat to wildlife, especially wide-ranging animals such as bears and wolves.

How Tracking Product Sources
May Help Save World’s Forests

by fred pearce
Global businesses are increasingly pledging to obtain key commodities only from sources that do not contribute to deforestation. Now, nonprofit groups are deploying data tools that help hold these companies to their promises by tracing the origins of everything from soy to timber to beef.

How Warming Is Threatening
The Genetic Diversity of Species

by jim robbins
Research on stoneflies in Glacier National Park indicates that global warming is reducing the genetic diversity of some species, compromising their ability to evolve as conditions change. These findings have major implications for how biodiversity will be affected by climate change.

Full Speed Ahead: Shipping
Plans Grow as Arctic Ice Fades

by ed struzik
Russia, China, and other nations are stepping up preparations for the day when large numbers of cargo ships will be traversing a once-icebound Arctic Ocean. But with vessels already plying these waters, experts say the time is now to prepare for the inevitable environmental fallout.

How Forensics Are Boosting
Battle Against Wildlife Trade

by heather millar
From rapid genetic analysis to spectrography, high-tech tools are being used to track down and prosecute perpetrators of the illegal wildlife trade. The new advances in forensics offer promise in stopping the trafficking in endangered species.

African Wetlands Project: A Win
For the Climate and the People?

by winifred bird
In Senegal and other developing countries, multinational companies are investing in programs to restore mangrove forests and other wetlands that sequester carbon. But critics say these initiatives should not focus on global climate goals at the expense of the local people’s livelihoods.

Ghost Forests: How Rising Seas
Are Killing Southern Woodlands

by roger real drouin
A steady increase in sea levels is pushing saltwater into U.S. wetlands, killing trees from Florida as far north as New Jersey. But with sea level projected to rise by as much as six feet this century, the destruction of coastal forests is expected to become a worsening problem worldwide.

e360 digest
Yale Environment 360 is
a publication of the
Yale School of Forestry
& Environmental Studies


Donate to Yale Environment 360
Yale Environment 360 Newsletter



About e360
Submission Guidelines

E360 en Español

Universia partnership
Yale Environment 360 articles are now available in Spanish and Portuguese on Universia, the online educational network.
Visit the site.


e360 Digest
Video Reports


Business & Innovation
Policy & Politics
Pollution & Health
Science & Technology


Antarctica and the Arctic
Central & South America
Middle East
North America

e360 VIDEO

A look at how acidifying oceans could threaten the Dungeness crab, one of the most valuable fisheries on the U.S. West Coast.
Watch the video.


The latest
from Yale
Environment 360
is now available for mobile devices at e360.yale.edu/mobile.


An aerial view of why Europe’s per capita carbon emissions are less than 50 percent of those in the U.S.
View the photos.

e360 VIDEO

An indigenous tribe’s deadly fight to save its ancestral land in the Amazon rainforest from logging.
Learn more.

e360 VIDEO

Food waste
An e360 video series looks at the staggering amount of food wasted in the U.S. – a problem with major human and environmental costs.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Choco rainforest Cacao
Residents of the Chocó Rainforest in Ecuador are choosing to plant cacao over logging in an effort to slow deforestation.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Tribal people and ranchers join together to stop a project that would haul coal across their Montana land.
Watch the video.