24 Sep 2012: Report

High-Altitude Wind Energy:
Huge Potential — And Hurdles

A host of start-up companies are exploring ways to harness the enormous amount of wind energy flowing around the earth, especially at high altitudes. But as these innovators are discovering, the engineering and regulatory challenges of what is known as airborne wind power are daunting.

by dave levitan

The wind turbines that increasingly dot the landscape peak at around 300 feet above ground, with the massive blades spinning a bit higher. The wind, however, does not peak at 300 feet. Winds are faster and more consistent the higher one climbs, maxing out in the jet streams at five miles and above.

With conventional wind power facing a litany of obstacles — intermittency, space requirements, not-in-my-backyard complaints — pushing wind power up into the atmosphere could take a lot of uncertainty out of the equation. And despite a host of technical and regulatory challenges, a growing number of small companies are working hard to get up there within the next few years, with numerous designs and ideas aimed at harvesting wind power high in the sky.

“The potential is incredibly high,” says Cristina Archer, an associate professor of ocean science and engineering at the University of Delaware. Archer and a colleague published one of two recent detailed analyses of the total energy that could be extracted from the planet’s winds to generate electricity. The other was conducted by well-known climate scientist Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution and Stanford University. Both found an effectively unlimited supply of power, with vastly more available as one moves up away from the ground.

View gallery
Makani Power Wind Generator

Makani Power
A fixed-wing aircraft being developed by California-based Makani Power rotates at variable altitudes while tethered to a generator.
But Caldeira and others say that while they see enormous long-term potential in airborne wind, the engineering and regulatory challenges are formidable, particularly if companies want to tap into powerful jet stream winds.

“I would be reluctant to remortgage my house and invest the money in these companies, because I think the probability of them being able to compete in the marketplace at scale in, say, the next decade is pretty small,” he says. Nevertheless, he believes that given both its enormous possibilities and the various hurdles it faces, the airborne wind industry is an ideal candidate for public research and development support.

The questions surrounding airborne wind are significant. How do you safely suspend airborne turbines hundreds or thousands of feet off the ground? How do you keep them aloft for long periods of time in high winds without having to perform frequent, costly maintenance? And what about interference with aviation?

Proponents say, however, that in some ways high-altitude wind power could end up being easier to deploy — and cheaper — than traditional wind energy. Construction costs will be markedly diminished with no need for giant steel and concrete towers, and there will be no need for the yaw mechanism that keeps standard turbines facing into the wind as wind direction changes.

Instead, the basic premise of airborne generation is to tether a device to the ground and let it fly around in the strong winds like a kite, either generating power and sending it down a tether to the ground or using the tether itself to produce electricity at its base. The specific devices on the
The basic premise is to tether a device to the ground and let it fly around in strong winds, generating power.
end of the tether vary widely in design. Terrestrial windmill design is largely settled; but up in the sky, it seems like anything goes. There are rigid, carbon-fiber wings outfitted with multiple small turbines; softer kite-like devices that fly in figure-eights and generate power by coiling and uncoiling a tether; devices that resemble a blimp rotating around a horizontal axis; and several other concepts. No consensus exists on an optimal design, though some may be better suited for utility-scale wind farms while others may fit smaller, niche-market applications.

One company that seems close to deployment is Makani Power, based in Alameda, California. Makani’s tethered rigid wing has been through seven development iterations and numerous test flights in six years, and the latest prototype can generate 30 kilowatts of power. With close to $20 million in funding from Google and the Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), Makani hopes to build a 92-foot wingspan version rated at 600 kilowatts, which could supply power to about 150 households.

Corwin Hardham, the founder and CEO of Makani, says the company has interest from developers and could start building airborne wind farms within a few years. Farther in the future, Hardham hopes his company can build a 5-megawatt behemoth version, with a 213-foot wingspan best suited for offshore use.

“That’s where our approach really shines, offshore,” Hardham says, adding that he thinks Makani could eventually produce power at 6 cents per kilowatt-hour at offshore installations. That’s far cheaper than current offshore wind power in Europe and would make it extremely competitive with power produced from coal and natural gas.

View gallery
Magenn Power Inc. Wind Generator

Magenn Power Inc.
Magenn Power’s helium-filled, blimp-like structure floats 1,000 feet up, and the entire balloon spins around a horizontal axis as the wind blows past.
Another company close to actual wind farm development is Ampyx Power, based in the Netherlands and spun out of research at Delft University. Ampyx’s PowerPlane is a glider that generates electricity by pulling on its tether, which is connected to a ground-mounted generator. The PowerPlane glides around between 1,000 and 2,000 feet; the next iteration of this design should generate 250 to 500 kilowatts continuously, says founder Richard Ruiterkamp.

“We’ve been flying autonomously now for about a year,” Ruiterkamp says. “Before the end of the year we will have the full cycle up and running for a number of hours.” The next hurdle, he says, is to operate for multiple days consecutively without human intervention. Ampyx says it expects construction on a wind farm to begin within several years.

Two companies with dramatically different ideas are California-based Magenn Power and Boston-based Altaeros. Magenn’s helium-filled, blimp-like structure floats 1,000 feet up, and the entire balloon spins around a horizontal axis as the wind blows past. This technology is about as bird-friendly a design as one could imagine, with no spinning blades, and has undergone successful test flights.

Altaeros, meanwhile, also uses a helium-filled device, though to quite different effect. The balloon shell surrounds the blades and hub of a standard turbine in the center, basically serving to lift a normal windmill 1,000 feet off the ground. The company says it successfully tested a prototype earlier this year, and reports that the turbine generated twice the power at 350 feet as the same turbine did at standard heights of about 100 feet.

These inflatable designs, along with soft-wing kite designs like that made by North Carolina-based Windlift, may end up being most suitable for off-grid, remote applications, given their easy transportability and quick set-up times, wind industry executives say.

“We’re working on small distributed systems rather than big utility-scale systems,” says Andy Stough, the vice president of engineering at Windlift. The company receives substantial funding from the U.S. Marine Corps, which hopes to power bases in remote locations with the soft-wing kite
Without strong government support, installing even one gigawatt of airborne power could take 20 years.
design instead of the expensive and sometimes hazardous necessity of trucking in or airlifting diesel fuel for generators.

The Windlift kite involves a 40-square-meter wing flying at a maximum altitude (for the moment) of 500 feet, with the controls and generator on the ground. Beyond the Marine Corps, Stough says anything involving remote power needs — off-grid mobile communications, disaster relief, and so on — could be a good candidate for these types of airborne wind systems. A German company called EnerKite uses a similar design and may be even closer to deployment; both companies have conducted successful test flights in recent years.

P.J. Shepard, co-founder of an industry group called the Airborne Wind Energy Consortium, says the progress toward working, power-generating prototypes has been impressive in the last few years. “Some [companies] have proven energy-generation capability, many have demonstrated some level of autonomous control, and a few are planning... power farm development,” she says.

But scaling up past the prototype stage won’t be easy. Experts in the industry think that without strong government support, installing even one gigawatt of airborne power (50 GW of standard, terrestrial wind are already installed in the U.S.) could take 20 years or more, an eternity when drastic emissions reductions are the goal. With a relatively modest government investment of $100 million per year, that one gigawatt goal could be attained in fewer than 10 years, wind industry executives say. Some larger companies such as Honeywell and 3M have shown some interest, but the major traditional wind power developers — Siemens, GE, Vestas, and others — have so far left the airborne designs to the startups.

Without major investment, some of the specific engineering challenges may be difficult to overcome. According to an industry survey by the nonprofit energy analysis group Near Zero, the biggest remaining issue is reliability: In order to be viable, airborne devices would need to stay aloft for long periods of time with little maintenance required.

When it comes to really taking advantage of higher altitude wind, Caldeira points out that reaching as high as the jet stream is the real prize. The
Reaching up into the powerful winds of the jet stream is the real prize.
power density in Earth’s jet streams is around 100 times that of sunlight hitting a standard photovoltaic cell. “The fact that there is no other renewable energy source available in abundance with such high power densities says to me that we should have a research program trying to exploit it,” Caldeira says. But the differences in engineering requirements between flying a device at 1,000 feet and at five or six miles are enormous.

Outside of R&D issues, another huge challenge is regulation. What, exactly, is a 80-foot-wide device, tethered to the ground, flying circles 1,000 feet up in the air? Is it an airplane? A “building” or “obstacle”? There is no clear regulatory framework for the industry, though in 2011 the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration did begin a process meant to include airborne wind systems in their governing structure. For the moment, this will limit testing to 499 feet of altitude, meaning the jet streams are still far out of reach.

“There is no way you can operate without some form of official approval from the authorities,” Ruiterkamp of Ampyx says. But he warns against trying to create a new regulatory framework from scratch, either in the Netherlands where his company is based, or in the U.S. “If you have to set this up all by yourself as an industry, it might take 15 years and there is no guarantee what the outcome will be,” Ruiterkamp says. He thinks that convincing authorities to work within the existing regulatory environment for manned and, increasingly, unmanned aircraft is the best approach.


Waging the Battle to Build the
U.S.’s First Offshore Wind Farm

Interview with Cape Winds Jim Gordon
After a decade seeking approval to build the U.S.’s first offshore wind farm, Cape Wind president Jim Gordon is on the verge of beginning construction. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, he describes why his struggle has been good for clean energy — and why the fight is still not over.
Safety and related regulations are not trivial concerns. That 5-MW Makani device that’s in the works? Its 213-foot wingspan is about the same as that of a Boeing 747. If something that big breaks its tether and hits the ground, it poses obvious dangers. Even the M600 is roughly the same width as the wingspan of a Boeing 737. Clearly, if industrial-scale farms are coming that feature these mammoths flying around at the end of 1,000-foot tethers, it can’t happen without strict regulatory control.

In spite of the obstacles, proponents say, the sheer magnitude of the energy in high-altitude wind makes this well worth trying. “Whether the total resource is 100 terawatts, 1,000, or 2,000, I don’t know exactly,” says Archer. But regardless of the actual number, she says, the energy in high-altitude wind is “much higher than we would ever possibly need.”

POSTED ON 24 Sep 2012 IN Business & Innovation Climate Energy Forests Science & Technology Central & South America North America 


Why Air-borne Wind Energy? We have not tapped even a small percentage of onshore and offshore wind Energy? Such technologies may look fancy from outside but in reality they will be utter failure. Let us not waste time, energy and resources on such utopian ideas.

Dr. A. Jagadeesh Nellore (AP), India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com

Posted by Dr.A.Jagadeesh on 24 Sep 2012

As currently being built, giant wind turbines are not efficient, generating maybe 30 percent of their faceplate capacity over the course of a year. They don't reduce carbon dioxide because a conventional plant must remain online to take up the slack. Their construction requires roads in roadless places, whole mountaintops are flattened off, thousands of acres of concrete is laid in places that formerly had none. And worst of all, they kill birds and bats by the millions — and deny that it happens at all.

Their representatives lobby Congress constantly to have the Production Tax Credits reenacted. These are 30-year-old credits to their industry, which makes as much sense as the government sponsoring room-size computers for the last 30 years when everyone else is getting an iPad.

Why not try different approaches? Being considerate of the last great places on earth, wildlife and the life of local residents (so cunningly dismissed as NIMBY's by the wind industry) is not utopian. It's a necessary feature of life on our lovely blue marble.

Giant conventional wind turbines are a way to make wealthy men wealthier. The money comes from the tax payers and rate payers not some imaginary bucket of free money floating around in low-earth orbit.

Wind is the only form of energy which calls its neighbors names before the project is even built. That shows they have no intention of working with the local people — or that local people have any value to these self-described "experts."

In contrast the local gas-fired electricity plant here has never called anyone a NIMBY even when neighbors asked for substantial changes in their finished appearance when they converted from nuclear to gas. PG&E called local people "stakeholders" and made as many changes as they could to stay good neighbors.

That the wind industry calls these NIMBY names and tries to suppress research and development means they don't give a damn about anything but their own bottom line and will say/do anything to maintain it.

Posted by Ellin Beltz on 24 Sep 2012

Dr. Jagadeesh,

Airborne Wind Energy need not be as "fancy" as this article suggests, but can be simple and cheap. Kite energy at its simplest is just flying the right kind of kite to reach better wind. Just see how well kite sports are powered by wind, and let human ingenuity try to extend the utility of the principle.

Sadly, wind at tower height is just not enough to end dependence on burning fossil fuel, so please keep an open mind as we experiment. India is especially favored by great kite traditions, and will be a key R&D player,

Dave Santos
KiteLab Group

Posted by Dave Santos on 24 Sep 2012

Nonsense! You can't fix a problem using the same midset that caused it.

Posted by Trevor Burrowes on 24 Sep 2012

It seems everyone is looking for the "silver bullet" when it comes to energy solutions. If a potential solution doesn't produce 90 percent or more of the demand, it is deemed not worth pursuing. Most problems are not solved but just one thing, but many.

I believe these approaches offer great potential and should be pursued. Time for private investors to enter in the fray.

There are technical hurdles that have to be scaled but there are a lot of smart people out there. The energy potential is too large to ignore.

Posted by Pete on 26 Sep 2012

I do not understand ... How to solve a problem using the same mindset that caused it!?

Posted by Coque on 28 Sep 2012

"I do not understand ... How to solve a problem using the same mindset that caused it!?"

You might also Google the "Jevons Paradox."


Posted by Trevor Burrowes on 02 Oct 2012

Dear Sirs, The U.S. Naval Laboratory invented a method of manufacturing jet fuel from recycled carbon dioxide and sea water, a process empowered by electricity from the nuclear power plants in aircraft carriers. The Navy is also going to scrap two 200 million dollar fuel tankers due to a budget oversight. So, what if we modifed these tankers to do this process, shipping in unlimited CO2 from our coal burning electric power plants, and used these high altitude wind power systems to provide unlimited electricity to make jet fuel and possibly other types of fuel commercially? It would be a carbon neutral industry, due to the wind power option.

Posted by Robert G. Schreib Jr. on 27 Oct 2012

Am so privileged to have read this article on the airborne wind energy. Am impressed by the way the human mind is always thinking out of the box to solve existing challenges. May the good
governments and the private sector increase their grants for these researches & development. We need this energy badly!

Posted by Dickson Munyoki on 16 Dec 2012

Quaint, but the investors in a real world want more than wish full thoughts they need data. Reproducible data could be obtained from a research vessel anchored under the predominant tracks of the jet stream in international waters where Mar Librium is the prevailing law and regulation is not a problem.

Liquid fueled thorium reactors (LFTR) on the other hand have demonstrated years of safe and continuous operation in a configuration that can breed thousands of years of fuel, destroy all our accumulated nuclear waste and leave the world less radioactive in the end than when we found it. They can do this all while providing fail safe continuous base load electrical and thermal power.

China India, France and Former Soviet Republics are all pursuing LFTR. Perhaps we could resurrect our pioneering research. Once they establish intellectual property over the implemented reactor designs we will be obligated by international law to pay them royalties on the designs. Then they really could tell us to go fly a kite.

Posted by Ted Thomas on 06 Jan 2013

I have been thinking about a concept like this for years, though have never been able to implement it, I am glad there is someone that is pursuing this idea.

The higher the turbine the better, in the atmosphere there are constant winds, so the turbine would be turning 24/7, unlike the ones in the sea or on land.

the thing that is a bad idea is to keep using coal fired plants that produce toxins and pollutants into the air.

If Liquid fueled thorium reactor power plants could be developed that use recycled nuclear reactor fuel, then that would be the best way to go, but as we are not there yet, we should work on developing technologies that help improve the environment.

I have also been thinking about a similar idea for Solar Kites, putting thin film panels on a kite type structure, and flying them above the clouds to capture more sunlight, the higher up, the better.

Ellin, Obviously you know nothing about wind turbines. First, they pay themselves off in about 6 months. Secondly, They are more environmentally friendly than building skyscrapers or a new mall, which most people are perfectly happy being built. IF someone wants to build a mall, then they will build it regardless of environmental impact.

The design and function of these Giant floating wind turbines is the best of all areas. NO environmental impact, since they aren't on the ground, no pollutants, a constant supply of free abundant energy (wind) and we do not have to mine, or drill, or use up our supplies of. no building a huge plant to produce energy, and these can be distributed where ever there is a good constant wind flow in the atmosphere. We would have to just make sure they are out of flight paths for aircraft.

Posted by ideaman on 27 Apr 2013

Comments have been closed on this feature.
dave levitanABOUT THE AUTHOR
Dave Levitan is a freelance journalist based in Philadelphia who writes about energy, the environment, and health. His articles have been published by Reuters, SolveClimate, IEEE Spectrum, and Psychology Today. In previous articles for Yale Environment 360, he has written about the potential of self-driving cars and about vehicle-to-grid technology involving electric cars.



How Laundry Detergent Became
A Catalyst for Green Innovation

In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Adam Lowry, co-founder of a company that has pioneered the use of environmentally friendly cleaning products, discusses how a small firm has been able to nudge large corporations down the path of sustainability.

Green Crude: The Quest to
Unlock Algae’s Energy Potential

A host of startup companies are pursuing new technologies that they claim will soon lead to large-scale commercialization of biofuels made from algae. But questions remain about the viability and environmental benefits of what some of its developers are calling “green crude.”

For Electric Car Batteries,
The Race for a Rapid Charge

The amount of time it takes to recharge lithium-ion batteries has been a major impediment to consumer acceptance of electric vehicles. But a host of companies and researchers are working intensively to develop a battery that can recharge in 10 minutes and power a car for hundreds of miles.

Self-Driving Cars: Coming
Soon to a Highway Near You

Vehicles that virtually drive themselves are no longer the stuff of science fiction, with Google and other companies working to develop self-driving cars. These automated vehicles not only offer improved safety and fewer traffic jams, but real environmental benefits as well.

Solar Windows: Transforming
Buildings Into Energy Producers

The vast amount of glass in skyscrapers and office buildings represents enormous potential for an emerging technology that turns windows into solar panels. But major questions remain as to whether solar windows can be sufficiently inexpensive and efficient to be widely adopted.


MORE IN Reports

As Chinese Luxury Market Grows,
An Upsurge in Tiger Killings in India

by sharon guynup
Poachers killed more tigers in the forests of India in 2016 than any year in the last 15. The spike is linked to demand for tiger parts in China, where the endangered animal’s bones and skins are regarded as exotic luxury items.

New Look at Rivers Reveals
The Toll of Human Activity

by jim robbins
A recent outbreak of a deadly fish parasite on the Yellowstone River may have seemed unremarkable. But a new wave of research shows the episode was likely linked to the cumulative impact of human activities that essentially weakened the Yellowstone’s "immune system."

On Slopes of Kilimanjaro, Shift
In Climate Hits Coffee Harvest

by daniel grossman
Rising temperatures and changing precipitation are taking a toll on coffee farms worldwide, including the plantations around Mount Kilimanjaro. If the world hopes to sustain its two billion cup-a-day habit, scientists say, new climate-resilient species of coffee must be developed.

Aimed at Refugees, Fences Are
Threatening European Wildlife

by jim o'donnell
A flood of migrants from the Middle East and Africa has prompted governments in the Balkans to erect hundreds of miles of border fences. Scientists say the expanding network of barriers poses a serious threat to wildlife, especially wide-ranging animals such as bears and wolves.

How Tracking Product Sources
May Help Save World’s Forests

by fred pearce
Global businesses are increasingly pledging to obtain key commodities only from sources that do not contribute to deforestation. Now, nonprofit groups are deploying data tools that help hold these companies to their promises by tracing the origins of everything from soy to timber to beef.

How Warming Is Threatening
The Genetic Diversity of Species

by jim robbins
Research on stoneflies in Glacier National Park indicates that global warming is reducing the genetic diversity of some species, compromising their ability to evolve as conditions change. These findings have major implications for how biodiversity will be affected by climate change.

Full Speed Ahead: Shipping
Plans Grow as Arctic Ice Fades

by ed struzik
Russia, China, and other nations are stepping up preparations for the day when large numbers of cargo ships will be traversing a once-icebound Arctic Ocean. But with vessels already plying these waters, experts say the time is now to prepare for the inevitable environmental fallout.

How Forensics Are Boosting
Battle Against Wildlife Trade

by heather millar
From rapid genetic analysis to spectrography, high-tech tools are being used to track down and prosecute perpetrators of the illegal wildlife trade. The new advances in forensics offer promise in stopping the trafficking in endangered species.

African Wetlands Project: A Win
For the Climate and the People?

by winifred bird
In Senegal and other developing countries, multinational companies are investing in programs to restore mangrove forests and other wetlands that sequester carbon. But critics say these initiatives should not focus on global climate goals at the expense of the local people’s livelihoods.

Ghost Forests: How Rising Seas
Are Killing Southern Woodlands

by roger real drouin
A steady increase in sea levels is pushing saltwater into U.S. wetlands, killing trees from Florida as far north as New Jersey. But with sea level projected to rise by as much as six feet this century, the destruction of coastal forests is expected to become a worsening problem worldwide.

e360 digest
Yale Environment 360 is
a publication of the
Yale School of Forestry
& Environmental Studies


Donate to Yale Environment 360
Yale Environment 360 Newsletter



About e360
Submission Guidelines

E360 en Español

Universia partnership
Yale Environment 360 articles are now available in Spanish and Portuguese on Universia, the online educational network.
Visit the site.


e360 Digest
Video Reports


Business & Innovation
Policy & Politics
Pollution & Health
Science & Technology


Antarctica and the Arctic
Central & South America
Middle East
North America

e360 VIDEO

A look at how acidifying oceans could threaten the Dungeness crab, one of the most valuable fisheries on the U.S. West Coast.
Watch the video.


The latest
from Yale
Environment 360
is now available for mobile devices at e360.yale.edu/mobile.


An aerial view of why Europe’s per capita carbon emissions are less than 50 percent of those in the U.S.
View the photos.

e360 VIDEO

An indigenous tribe’s deadly fight to save its ancestral land in the Amazon rainforest from logging.
Learn more.

e360 VIDEO

Food waste
An e360 video series looks at the staggering amount of food wasted in the U.S. – a problem with major human and environmental costs.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Choco rainforest Cacao
Residents of the Chocó Rainforest in Ecuador are choosing to plant cacao over logging in an effort to slow deforestation.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Tribal people and ranchers join together to stop a project that would haul coal across their Montana land.
Watch the video.