17 Sep 2012: Report

Obama vs. Romney: A Stark
Contrast on the Environment

As the U.S. presidential campaign enters its final phase, Yale Environment 360 compares the sharply divergent views of President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney on the environment and energy.

Few policy issues separate Barack Obama and Mitt Romney more widely than the environment and energy. One man believes human activity is driving global warming, the other questions to what extent humans are responsible. One advocates federal support for renewable energy technologies, the other believes that alternative energy should sink or swim on its own merits. One believes that the U.S. government can play an important role in setting standards that are environmentally and financially beneficial, the other calls the Environmental Protection Agency “a tool in the hands of the president to crush the private enterprise system.”

What follows is a summary of the positions of the two candidates on four key issues:

Climate Change | Oil and Gas Drilling
Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
The EPA and Environmental Regulation

Climate Change

Barack Obama

  • Supports continued international efforts to forge an agreement among major world economies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, despite failure to do so in past four years.

  • Supported carbon cap-and-trade legislation, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 2009 but died in U.S. Senate.

  • Enacted regulations to double the fuel efficiency of U.S. vehicles by 2025.

  • President Barack Obama
    Nicholas Kamm/AFP/GettyImages
    Barack Obama
  • Invested billions of dollars in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs through economic stimulus legislation.

  • Empowered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to draft stricter carbon dioxide emissions standards on fossil fuel-burning power plants.

  • Directed the federal government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from its buildings and vehicles by 28 percent by 2020.

  • In response to Romney and other Republicans belittling efforts to combat climate change, Obama said at Democratic convention, “My [energy] plan will continue to reduce the carbon pollution that is heating our planet — because climate change is not a hoax. More droughts and floods and wildfires are not a joke. They are a threat to our children’s future.”

Mitt Romney

  • Wary of international climate negotiations, noting that emissions growth is coming from developing nations and warning that the U.S. must avoid “unilateral” CO2 reductions that would place its economy at a global disadvantage.

  • Opposes, in the words of the Republican Party platform, “any and all cap-and-trade legislation.” Said earlier, “The idea of spending trillions and trillions of dollars to try to reduce CO2 emissions is not the right course for us.”

  • Opposes Obama’s new fuel efficiency standards as extreme.

  • Governor Mitt Romney
    Jewel Samad/AFP/GettyImages
    Mitt Romney
  • Opposes EPA regulating carbon dioxide emissions.

  • Has expressed shifting positions on the threat posed by climate change. In 2009 book, No Apology, he wrote, “I believe that climate change is occurring — the reduction in size of the global ice caps is hard to ignore. I also believe that human activity is a contributing factor. I am uncertain how much of the warming, however, is attributable to man...”

  • Has contradicted those earlier statements during the current campaign. “My view is that we don’t know what’s causing climate change on this planet,” he said last year at Pittsburgh fundraiser.

  • As Massachusetts governor from 2003 to 2007, initially supported a regional carbon cap-and-trade program, saying that a “flexible market-based regional cap-and-trade system could serve as an effective approach” to reducing carbon emissions. He eventually refused to join the initiative because it did not contain price controls to limit energy costs.

  • Has made light of Obama administration efforts to regulate CO2, saying, “Now I know there is also a movement to say that carbon dioxide should be... managed by the Environmental Protection Agency. I disagree with that. I exhale carbon dioxide. I don’t want those guys following me around with a meter to see if I’m breathing too hard.”

Oil and Gas Drilling

Barack Obama

  • Has opened millions of new acres of federal lands, boosting domestic oil production. Notes that oil imports as share of U.S. consumption have decreased from 57 percent in 2008 to 45 percent today.

  • In past year, oil imports cut by 10 percent, equivalent to 1 million barrels a day. Has vowed to cut current oil imports in half by 2020.

  • Supports the unprecedented surge in natural gas production due to rapid expansion of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, of underground shale formations. Vowed at Democratic convention to develop the 100-year supply of natural gas “that’s right beneath our feet,” creating 600,000 jobs.

  • Backs EPA’s development of regulations, in coordination with states, to oversee fracking and reduce the technology’s water and air pollution. In May, the Department of the Interior proposed rules requiring companies hydrofracturing shale on public lands to disclose contents of drilling fluids, but only after drilling has taken place.

  • Has deferred until after the election a decision on construction of the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, which would carry oil sands from Alberta, Canada to refineries in Texas. Has approved southern segment of the pipeline from Oklahoma to Texas.

  • Has approved limited oil drilling off Alaska’s coast, but opposes drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

  • Has refused to open coasts off the Atlantic and Pacific seaboards to oil and gas drilling.

  • Has called for ending $4 billion in taxpayer subsidies to oil companies.

Mitt Romney

  • Has vowed to make the U.S. energy-independent by 2020, primarily by relying on a “cornucopia” of carbon-based fuels.

  • Has accused Obama of pursuing an “incoherent” energy policy that has “stifled” the domestic energy sector, killed millions of jobs, and cost the government billions of dollars in revenue by over-regulating the oil and gas industry. Says the Obama administration is waging “war” against the oil and coal industries.

  • Proposes a six-point energy plan that would empower states to control onshore energy development, including on federal lands; open up offshore areas, including the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, to oil drilling; collaborate more closely with Canada and Mexico on energy, including construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline; streamline and reduce regulation of the oil and gas industry.

  • Favors oil and gas drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

  • Calls for opening up more public lands — including those in and around some national parks — to oil and gas drilling.

  • Vows to prevent overregulation of fracking and shale gas extraction, a sphere environmental groups maintain is under-regulated.

  • As Massachusetts governor, did not display his current all-embracing support of fossil fuels. Was sharply critical of a heavily polluting coal plant in Salem, Mass., saying, “I will not protect jobs that kill people. And that plant kills people.”

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

Barack Obama

  • Has invested billions of dollars in renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. Since 2008, U.S. has doubled generation of electricity from renewable sources; nearly 6 percent of U.S. electricity now comes from non-hydropower, alternative energy sources.

  • In 2011, U.S. was the world leader in clean energy spending, investing $48 billion in green energy.

  • Has set ambitious clean energy goals, vowing that 80 percent of U.S. electricity will come from renewable sources by 2035.

  • Has supported legislation, now set to expire, that extends production tax credits to the wind industry.

  • His administration gave $535 million in federal loan guarantees to the now-bankrupt solar panel manufacturer, Solyndra, sparking harsh criticism from Romney and Republicans.

  • Has enacted regulations requiring U.S. vehicle fleets to attain an average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, a doubling of current standards. Says the new standards will reduce U.S. oil consumption by 2.2 million barrels per day by 2025, saving consumers $1.7 trillion at the pump, and eliminating 6 billion metric tons of carbon pollution by 2025. Has helped fund efficiency upgrades on more than 1 million homes and 1,400 manufacturing plants.

  • Department of Defense has embarked on a wide range of programs to develop biofuels for its ships, vehicles, and planes, and to bring renewable energy technologies to the battlefield.

  • Has accused the Romney campaign of drafting an energy plan “written by and for big oil companies.” Told community college students in Maryland, “They dismiss wind power. They dismiss solar power. They make jokes about biofuels. They were against raising fuel standards. If some of these folks were around when Columbus set sail, they probably must have been founding members of the flat earth society.”

Mitt Romney

  • Opposes extending the production tax credit for the wind industry and has vowed to end federal subsidies for renewable energy projects. Campaign spokesman said Romney will “end the stimulus boondoggles and create a level playing field on which all sources of energy can complete on their merits.”

  • Vows to “facilitate private-sector-led development of new energy technologies”

  • Has sharply criticized Obama’s approach to renewable energy, writing in an op-ed, “In place of real energy, Obama has focused on an imaginary world where government-subsidized windmills and solar panels could power the economy. This vision has failed.” Said Obama’s green jobs strategy “seems to be operating more on faith than on fact-based calculation.”

  • Mocked Obama’s “all of the above” energy strategy, saying what Obama really meant is that he supports only energy sources that come from above ground: “So he’s for solar and wind, but he doesn’t like coal, oil, and gas because they’re below the ground. Now we understand Obama-speak a little better.”

  • Shortly after becoming governor of Massachusetts, supported renewable energy and energy efficiency initiatives, authorizing the investment of $24 million from a state trust state in alternative energy projects. Encouraged public-private partnerships to develop clean energy.

The EPA and Environmental Regulation

Barack Obama

  • Supports proposed EPA regulations setting tougher CO2 emissions thresholds for fossil fuel-fired power plants. Many existing coal plants are currently unable to meet these standards, while the growing number of natural gas-fired power plants will.

  • Supports proposed EPA regulations limiting emissions of mercury and other toxics from power plants.

  • Declined to implement a regulation proposed by the EPA under the Clean Air Act that would have reduced concentrations of ground-level ozone from 75 to 70 parts per billion, saying the $90 billion cost of the tougher standards would have been onerous on businesses during the recession. Doctors said the tougher standards would have saved several thousand lives a year and led to several million fewer cases of respiratory ailments.

  • Supports continued federal regulation of oil and gas drilling on federal lands.

Mitt Romney

This article was written by Yale Environment 360 senior editor Fen Montaigne, with research assistance from Rebeka Ryvola, Aliyya Swaby, and Jacob Cohn.

POSTED ON 17 Sep 2012 IN Climate Policy & Politics Policy & Politics North America 


Excellent coverage on climate change, environment and energy in the present U.S. presidential election campaign. Undoubtedly President Barack Obama's commitment on measures to control climate change and clean energy technologies is total.

Dr. A. Jagadeesh Nellore(AP), India

Posted by Dr.A.Jagadeesh on 18 Sep 2012

Thank you for posting! It's great to see all of this information presented side-by-side.

Posted by Kelly on 18 Sep 2012

If there were some way to harness the energy old Windsock Willard (aka Mittwit) has put into backing away from earlier sensible positions, that in itself could lighten the import problem.

In personal terms, he's probably too intelligent to believe in half the guff he spouts, but as a leading British retailer once observed about advertising, half of the spending was wasted — he just wished he could identify which half.

Posted by Ben Edwards on 20 Sep 2012

It would be great to put this in an infographic and send it through the social media :) Great work!

Posted by Benn on 20 Sep 2012


This in my mind holds global implications that impact all living things on Earth. We can't let Politics and Big Business determine the correct path Human Kind should take." WE THE PEOPLE" should be the ones who choose. We share this world with many wondrous living animals that don't have a vote, and will not be able to adapt to the world and environment humans are impacting.

All I ask is for every voter to become informed about the issues and their impacts on all living things.We hold the future in our hands,not only with our vote,but with how we live our lives." LIVE SIMPLY SO THAT OTHERS MAY SIMPLY LIVE.

Posted by Dan B. McGlothlin on 30 Sep 2012

Thanks for this! It would have been great to add the difference between Obama's pre-White House rhetoric with what he has actually done. Moreover, an analysis of their financiers would have shed light on what to actually expect from the candidates.

Posted by M on 01 Oct 2012

Great seeing both agendas side by side like this. Definitely pros and cons from both sides. These energy agendas are going to be a huge factor in which way I vote.

Posted by Brandon J. Jones on 02 Oct 2012

What I'm noticing is the way that "environment" has been reduced down to "energy," with pollution control as an afterthought. That's a problem right there, despite the differences between the candidates.

Where's biodiversity? Where's habitat protection? Where's concern for endangered species?

Posted by Rana on 26 Oct 2012

Comments have been closed on this feature.



Point/Counterpoint: Is It Time for Greens
To Reassess Their Opposition to Ethanol?

The criticism of ethanol by environmentalists is misguided and just plain wrong. In fact, thanks to improvements in farming techniques, increasing the amount of corn ethanol in U.S. gasoline would reduce air pollution, provide significant health benefits, and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

The Case Against More Ethanol:
It's Simply Bad for Environment

The revisionist effort to increase the percentage of ethanol blended with U.S. gasoline continues to ignore the major environmental impacts of growing corn for fuel and how it inevitably leads to higher prices for this staple food crop. It remains a bad idea whose time has passed.

For James Hansen, the Science
Demands Activism on Climate

Climate scientist James Hansen has crossed the classic divide between research and activism. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, he responds to critics and explains why he believes the reality of climate change requires him to speak out.

How to Talk About Clean
Energy With Conservatives

Angel Garcia, of Young Conservatives for Energy Reform, is working to persuade Republicans about the need for renewable energy. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, he explains why his group avoids mentioning climate change when it makes its pitch to conservatives

Beyond the Oregon Protests:
The Search for Common Ground

Thrust into the spotlight by a group of anti-government militants as a place of confrontation, the Malheur wildlife refuge is actually a highly successful example of a new collaboration in the West between local residents and the federal government.


MORE IN Reports

As Drought Grips South Africa,
A Conflict Over Water and Coal

by keith schneider
Facing one of the worst droughts in memory, South Africa’s leaders have doubled down on their support of the water-intensive coal industry. But clean energy advocates say the smartest move would be to back the country’s burgeoning wind and solar power sectors.

Saving Amphibians: The Quest
To Protect Threatened Species

by jim robbins
The decline of the world’s amphibians continues, with causes ranging from fungal diseases to warmer and drier climates. Now, researchers are looking at ways to intervene with triage measures that could help save the most vulnerable populations.

How Rising CO2 Levels May
Contribute to Die-Off of Bees

by lisa palmer
As they investigate the factors behind the decline of bee populations, scientists are now eyeing a new culprit — soaring levels of carbon dioxide, which alter plant physiology and significantly reduce protein in important sources of pollen.

Can Uber-Style Buses Help
Relieve India's Air Pollution?

by jason overdorf
India’s megacities have some the deadliest air and worst traffic congestion in the world. But Indian startups are now launching initiatives that link smart-phone apps and private shuttle buses and could help keep cars and other motorized vehicles off the roads.

Trouble in Paradise: A Blight
Threatens Key Hawaiian Tree

by richard schiffman
The ʻohiʻa is Hawaii’s iconic tree, a keystone species that maintains healthy watersheds and provides habitat for numerous endangered birds. But a virulent fungal disease, possibly related to a warmer, drier climate, is now felling the island’s cherished 'ohi'a forests.

Climate Change Adds Urgency
To Push to Save World’s Seeds

by virginia gewin
In the face of rising temperatures and worsening drought, the world’s repositories of agricultural seeds may hold the key to growing food under increasingly harsh conditions. But keeping these gene banks safe and viable is a complicated and expensive challenge.

As World Warms, How Do We
Decide When a Plant is Native?

by janet marinelli
The fate of a tree planted at poet Emily Dickinson's home raises questions about whether gardeners can — or should — play a role in helping plant species migrate in the face of rising temperatures and swiftly changing botanical zones.

With New Tools, A Focus
On Urban Methane Leaks

by judith lewis mernit
Until recently, little was known about the extent of methane leaking from urban gas distribution pipes and its impact on global warming. But recent advances in detecting this potent greenhouse gas are pushing U.S. states to begin addressing this long-neglected problem.

Is Climate Change Putting
World's Microbiomes at Risk?

by jim robbins
Researchers are only beginning to understand the complexities of the microbes in the earth’s soil and the role they play in fostering healthy ecosystems. Now, climate change is threatening to disrupt these microbes and the key functions they provide.

As Electric Cars Stall, A Move
To Greener Trucks and Buses

by cheryl katz
Low gasoline prices and continuing performance issues have slowed the growth of electric car sales. But that has not stymied progress in electrifying larger vehicles, including garbage trucks, city buses, and medium-sized trucks used by freight giants like FedEx.

e360 digest
Yale Environment 360 is
a publication of the
Yale School of Forestry
& Environmental Studies


Donate to Yale Environment 360
Yale Environment 360 Newsletter



About e360
Submission Guidelines

E360 en Español

Universia partnership
Yale Environment 360 articles are now available in Spanish and Portuguese on Universia, the online educational network.
Visit the site.


e360 Digest
Video Reports


Business & Innovation
Policy & Politics
Pollution & Health
Science & Technology


Antarctica and the Arctic
Central & South America
Middle East
North America

e360 VIDEO

Tribal people and ranchers join together to stop a project that would haul coal across their Montana land.
Watch the video.


The latest
from Yale
Environment 360
is now available for mobile devices at e360.yale.edu/mobile.


An aerial view of why Europe’s per capita carbon emissions are less than 50 percent of those in the U.S.
View the photos.

e360 VIDEO

The 2015 Yale e360 Video Contest winner documents a Northeastern town's bitter battle over a wind farm.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Food waste
An e360 video series looks at the staggering amount of food wasted in the U.S. – a problem with major human and environmental costs.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Colorado wildfires
An e360 video goes onto the front lines with Colorado firefighters confronting deadly blazes fueled by a hotter, drier climate.
Watch the video.


A three-part series Tainted Harvest looks at the soil pollution crisis in China, the threat it poses to the food supply, and the complexity of any cleanup.
Read the series.