28 Aug 2014: Essay

Fate of the Passenger Pigeon
Looms as a Somber Warning

This September 1 marks the 100th anniversary of the death of Martha, the last known passenger pigeon on earth. The extinction of this once-abundant North American bird still stands as a cautionary tale.

by joel greenberg

This September 1 is the 100th anniversary of a landmark event in the history of biodiversity. On that day in 1914, at about one o'clock in the afternoon, Martha – the last surviving passenger pigeon – died at the Cincinnati Zoo. It is extraordinary to know with virtual certainty the day and hour when a species ceases to be a living entity. And it was a stunning development because less than half a century earlier, the passenger pigeon had been the most abundant bird in North America, if not the world.

As late as the 1860s, passenger pigeons had likely numbered in the billions, and their population was neither evenly distributed across the landscape

View Gallery
Martha, last passenger pigeon

Smithsonian Institution
Martha, the last surviving passenger pigeon, on display at the Smithsonian Institution.
nor in any way subtle. These birds had a propensity for forming huge aggregations that are difficult to imagine today. John James Audubon, America's best-known student of birds, recorded a flight of passenger pigeons along the Ohio River in Kentucky that eclipsed the sun for three days. Other accounts, written over the course of three centuries and in several languages, testify to the birds darkening the sky for hours at a time over the major cities of the eastern third of the United States and Canada.

At Fort Mississauga, Ontario (located at Niagara on the Lake, about 80 miles from Toronto) in early May of around 1860, Ross King, a major in the British army, witnessed and described in great detail a movement of passenger pigeons that has been calculated at more than two billion birds and, depending on how fast they were flying, could have been as many as 3.7 billion. Yet by 1890, there were probably no more than several thousand of the pigeons left, and the last wild bird was shot on April 3, 1902 in Laurel, Indiana. The rapidity with which this bird's population went from billions to none was, I believe, unprecedented. And it holds
The 1871 nesting of passenger pigeons in Wisconsin likely involved 136 million adult birds.
some important lessons today for a world where increasing numbers of species are becoming extinct.

At the time of Martha’s death, the depletion of so much abundance in such a short time was difficult for people to accept and explain. There were the deniers who claimed the hordes of pigeons all moved to South America where they changed their appearance to elude their pursuers. Some, like Henry Ford, accepted their extinction but thought the birds had drowned in the Pacific Ocean as they fled to freedom. More plausible theories included disease, which although not impossible is without any evidence at all, as large numbers of dead birds were never found (unlike caves today filled with dead bats, the victims of white-nose syndrome).

The best evidence is that the bird was "simply" slaughtered into oblivion. The introduction and expansion of the telegraph and railroad beginning in the 1840s meant that wherever the birds were observed the information could be distributed quickly and widely. This enabled hunters from all over to converge on such locations, and the proximity of rail stations meant the pigeon corpses could be easily conveyed to the burgeoning markets of the Midwest and East. These markets sustained anywhere from 600 to 3,000 hunters who did nothing but chase the birds throughout the year wherever they appeared. Their efforts were augmented by local hunters, who also took advantage of this fortuitous source of revenue.

Habitat loss played a role in the extinction as well, but only indirectly. There was still plenty of forage to support the birds, but logging and the expansion of agriculture reduced the areas where the birds could congregate and made them more accessible to hunters.

Of course, not every one of the billions of birds were shot or netted. Think about the links in the chain of life. Some of the pigeon nesting concentrations were incredibly large: The 1871 Wisconsin nesting spread across 850 square miles and likely involved 136 million adult birds. But the shooting, burning, cutting of nesting trees, and other disruptive practices
What drove the slaughter was the abundance of pigeons, which made them cheap.
used by hunters caused many pigeons to abandon their nests before eggs were laid or hatched, or chicks were fledged. The chicks, or squabs, were highly coveted themselves and barrels were filled with them. Consider that passenger pigeons nested once a year and laid a single egg. Thus with tremendous anthropogenic mortality and few if any young being produced, the collapse in population begins to become understandable. Those adults that eluded human pursuers eventually aged and met the fate of all organisms.

What drove the slaughter was the abundance of the pigeons, which made them cheap. They were the least expensive terrestrial protein available. Birds could be purchased for pennies a piece. In some places, the birds were worth nothing, and they were fed to pigs or simply discarded as garbage. In the last big nesting in 1878, one eyewitness reported that the pigeons were used to fill potholes in the road.

By 1900, there were three captive flocks all located in the Midwest. It is not known when Martha was born but she hatched either in the Milwaukee or Chicago flock. In either event, she was certainly descended from the Milwaukee birds and lived for a while in Chicago. From there, she was sent in 1902 to the Cincinnati Zoo where she shared quarters with a small flock, including a male named George. (The zoo channeled the first presidential first family, the Washingtons, in their naming of passenger pigeons.)

As time elapsed, even with some successful breeding, the captive pigeons declined until the only two remaining were George and Martha. On July 10, 1910, George died, leaving Martha the distinction by which she is known. Over the ensuing four years, Martha became infirm and less likely to flutter or walk. But she was an attraction and crowds gathered around her enclosure. Until the zoo took steps to protect her, visitors would throw sand at her to prompt her to move.

And then on that September day, Martha too joined the rest of her species. She was frozen in a block of ice and sent by train to the Smithsonian
If the passenger pigeon can disappear in decades, so can so many other of the planet’s riches.
Institution where she has been ever since.

The loss of the passenger pigeon did not go unnoticed: It helped spawn the country's first great environmental movement, which led to the federal government's assumption of jurisdiction over the taking of birds. The first such federal law was introduced on the floor of the United States House of Representatives in 1900 by Iowa Congressman John Fletcher Lacey: "It is late. It is too late as to the wild pigeon. The buffalo is almost a thing of the past, but there still remains much to preserve, and we must act earnestly if we would accomplish good things." This became known as the Lacey Act, which banned the interstate commerce in illegally obtained birds. A few years later, Congress passed the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which ratified an agreement with Britain (on behalf of Canada). We no longer slaughter migratory birds as we did in the nineteenth century.

Over the succeeding decades we began to see other pernicious things we were doing to rip asunder the web of life. Rachel Carson's Silent Spring warned about pesticides. There were other types of pollution, and there was habitat loss. These realizations contributed to the nation's second great environmental movement of the 1960s and 70s. Out of that effort, the country again enacted laws: the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act. This last was a promise that the United States would not allow species to become


The De-Extinction Debate: Should
We Bring Back the Woolly Mammoth?

Woolly Mammoth
A group led by futurist Stewart Brand is spearheading a movement to try to revive extinct species, such as the wooly mammoth and the passenger pigeon. In a Yale Environment 360 debate, Brand makes the case for trying to bring back long-gone species, while biologist Paul Ehrlich argues that the idea is ill conceived and morally wrong.
extinct, at least not without a major effort to save them.

Despite all that has happened since, Martha's death haunts us still. There is no better cautionary tale to the proposition that no matter how abundant something is – be it fuel, water, or an organism – we can lose it if we are not good stewards.

There are now over 7 billion of us on the planet, more than there ever were passenger pigeons at their most abundant. We struggle to increase our standards of living, which generally involves greater consumption of the world's resources – and the consequences of that are altering the world’s climate. Technological innovations allow us to locate and take more and more. Powerful political forces here in the U.S. are trying to weaken or gut the environmental laws. The seas are being denuded of tuna, sharks, and other targeted species. In the American West, aquifers and rivers are shrinking. And this summer, the citizens of Toledo, Ohio were warned not to drink water from Lake Erie, even after boiling, because the lake had been contaminated by unsafe levels of microcystin (from algal blooms related at least in part to agricultural runoff).

The story of Martha teaches us that we need to be vigilant and proceed with caution. If the passenger pigeon can disappear in decades, so can so many other of the planet's riches, be they biological or not – even if they now seem abundant. And those that are rare can vanish in a heartbeat.

POSTED ON 28 Aug 2014 IN Biodiversity Climate Forests Oceans Policy & Politics Science & Technology Antarctica and the Arctic 


As a life-long bird hunter, and a life member of Ducks Unlimited, I have been wrapped in shame over the fate of the Passenger Pigeon for as long as I can remember.

The loss of these birds at the hands of hunters was a tragedy bourne of ignorance. My predecessors, I suspect, simply could not imagine that the actions of mere humans could actually wipe out one of the most abundant species on earth.

I wish my fellow hunters had been able to see what was coming, but we cannot change the past. That's why I have supported Ducks Unlimited for so many years.

Yes, it is an organization primarily made up of bird hunters...but it's purpose is to raise tens of millions of dollars for habitat protection and, more importantly, restoration.

In fact, DU restores more wetlands habitat in the US, Canada and Mexico than do the respective federal governments combined.

It is the very least we can do to atone for the sin of wiping out the Passenger Pigeon.

I hope our species forever accepts the truth that our actions do matter to nature and the environment, and if we fail to heed the lessons of Martha and her kin this will happen again.
Posted by Steve Krueger on 28 Aug 2014

An excellent article and poignant on this anniversary. The story of Martha is a painful one, but it seems humanity refuses to learn the lessons related to extinction.

Peter Kareiva, top scientist with the Nature Conservancy once wrote: "The passenger pigeon, once so abundant that its flocks darkened the sky, went extinct, along with countless other species from the Steller's sea cow to the dodo, with no catastrophic or even measurable effects."

Two points. One, few credible scientists would make such a broad conclusion about "effects" without having done the necessary leg work to make the basic comparison between pre- and post-extinction circumstances. Two, such a heartless opinion offered by a leading conservation scientist ought to make everyone's blood run cold and make perfectly clear that while progress has been made in so many areas of human existence, ethics may not necessarily one of them.

Posted by Kyle Gardner on 29 Aug 2014

I loved your book and thought the explanation you fostered from the various ornithologists and records for the passenger pigeon's decline was the best, least cringe-filled, I've come across.

It makes sense to me.
Posted by Andy Sipocz on 02 Sep 2014

My father has been a member of Ducks Unlimited for over thirty years now. When I was a child, I thought DU was some kind of bird hunting club. It is much more than that it is a world leader in wetland and waterfowl preservation and conservation.

As far as the carrier pigeon, it is a profound tragedy that this bird was wiped off of our planet, with irresponsible and unchecked hunting playing a major role. We must never forget and learn from our mistakes so that they will never be repeated and so future generations can enjoy the wildlife.

Posted by Caleb on 30 Sep 2014

I did not realize that these birds only have one chick.
That explains a lot, I think.
Posted by Roger Faulkner on 05 Oct 2014


Comments are moderated and will be reviewed before they are posted to ensure they are on topic, relevant, and not abusive. They may be edited for length and clarity. By filling out this form, you give Yale Environment 360 permission to publish this comment.

Email address 
Please type the text shown in the graphic.

joel greenbergABOUT THE AUTHOR
Joel Greenberg is the author of A Feathered River Across the Sky: The Passenger Pigeon’s Flight to Extinction. He also co-produced, along with director David Mrazek, the documentary From Billions to None: The Passenger Pigeon’s Flight to Extinction, which will be shown widely on PBS stations. Greenberg is a researcher at the Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum, in Chicago, Illinois.



A Delicate Balance: Protecting
Northwest’s Glass Sponge Reefs

Rare and extensive reefs of glass sponges are found only one place on earth – a stretch of the Pacific Northwest coast. Now, efforts are underway to identify and protect these fragile formations before they are obliterated by fishing vessels that trawl the bottom.

How One African Village Learned
To Live with Its Wildlife and Prosper

The second runner-up in the Yale Environment 360 Video Contest tells the story of the residents of a forest village in central Mozambique who have helped create a tourist destination centered on an elephant population that once wreaked havoc in their community.

Natura 2000: EU Reserves Are
Facing Development Pressures

An astonishing 18 percent of the European Union’s land area is protected under a network of preserves known as Natura 2000. Now, at the urging of business interests and farmers, the EU is examining whether regulations on development in these areas should be loosened.

Global Extinction Rates: Why
Do Estimates Vary So Wildly?

Is it 150 species a day or 24 a day or far less than that? Prominent scientists cite dramatically different numbers when estimating the rate at which species are going extinct. Why is that?

Probing the Rich Inner Lives
Of the Planet’s Wild Animals

Scientist Carl Safina has examined our steadily evolving understanding of the complex interactions among the more social members of the animal world. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, he talks about why it’s vital to our humanity to empathize more deeply with wild creatures.


MORE IN Essays

Counting Species: What It Says
About Human Toll on Wildlife

by verlyn klinkenborg
By analyzing mitochondrial DNA, scientists now can make more accurate estimates of the numbers of individual species that existed centuries ago. What does it tell us about our impact on the natural world and about our own future?

Linking Twin Extinctions
Of Species and Languages

by verlyn klinkenborg
A recent study noted that most of the 6,900 languages spoken on Earth occur in regions of high biodiversity. These findings point to a strong correlation between biological and linguistic diversity, with languages closely connected to the habitats where they are found.

After the Great Quake,
Living with Earth’s Uncertainty

by verlyn klinkenborg
The Japanese earthquake and tsunami remind us that we exist in geologic time and in a world where catastrophic events beyond our predicting may occur. These events — and the growing specter of climate change — show how precariously we exist on the surface of a volatile planet.

e360 digest
Yale Environment 360 is
a publication of the
Yale School of Forestry
& Environmental Studies


Donate to Yale Environment 360
Yale Environment 360 Newsletter



About e360
Submission Guidelines

E360 en Español

Universia partnership
Yale Environment 360 articles are now available in Spanish and Portuguese on Universia, the online educational network.
Visit the site.


e360 Digest
Video Reports


Business & Innovation
Policy & Politics
Pollution & Health
Science & Technology


Antarctica and the Arctic
Central & South America
Middle East
North America

e360 VIDEO

The 2015 Yale e360 Video Contest winner documents a Northeastern town's bitter battle over a wind farm.
Watch the video.


The latest
from Yale
Environment 360
is now available for mobile devices at e360.yale.edu/mobile.

e360 VIDEO

A 2015 Yale e360 Video Contest winner captures stunning images of wild salmon runs in Alaska.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Colorado wildfires
An e360 video goes onto the front lines with Colorado firefighters confronting deadly blazes fueled by a hotter, drier climate.
Watch the video.


A three-part series Tainted Harvest looks at the soil pollution crisis in China, the threat it poses to the food supply, and the complexity of any cleanup.
Read the series.

header image
Top Image: aerial view of Iceland. © Google & TerraMetrics.