31 Aug 2015: Report

Natura 2000: EU Reserves Are
Facing Development Pressures

An astonishing 18 percent of the European Union’s land area is protected under a network of preserves known as Natura 2000. Now, at the urging of business interests and farmers, the EU is examining whether regulations on development in these areas should be loosened.

by christian schwagerl

Berlin's world-famous landmark, the Brandenburg Gate, is only 9 miles away. But in the Tegeler Fliess area, a protected nature reserve on the northern outskirts of Germany's capital, visitors seem far removed from the city's bustle. River otters, rare throughout Germany, are active along the creek that runs through the wetlands. Eurasian cranes circle overhead, searching for food in its extensive meadows and wetlands. On summer nights, the monotonous song of the corncrake, a species of rail in decline in
Rospuda Valley
Erik de Haan/Flickr
The Natura 2000 network helped preserve the 29,000-acre Rospuda Valley in eastern Poland.
Germany, can be heard.

"The Tegeler Fliess is a biological treasure trove," says Anja Sorges, managing director of the Berlin branch of the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union, Germany's largest nature conservation organization, known as NABU. Sorges attributes the high diversity of the 1,144-acre reserve to its legally protected status as part of the European Union’s Natura 2000 network, the world's largest system of nature reserves. "There is so much pressure from the city to use areas like this for building or infrastructure," says Sorges.

But how strong this protection will remain in coming years is unclear. Tegeler Fliess and all the areas that form the EU's Natura 2000 network — which now covers 18 percent of the European Union’s land area — are facing growing political pressure to scale back some of the protections the reserves now enjoy. Triggered by a group of member states, especially Great Britain and the Netherlands, the European Commission is carrying out an in-depth review of its nature conservation directives, which some top EU officials, as well as business and agricultural interests, say are outdated and stifle farming and business development.

The Natura 2000 network is not made up of strictly protected parks or preserves, but rather encompasses lands harboring threatened or endangered landscapes and species. As a result, some commercial activity
Natura 2000 represents an area equivalent in size to France, Germany, and Italy combined.
— including certain types of mining, business, and agriculture — is allowed in the network. (Traditional agricultural practices, for example, are seen as positive for biodiversity and are permissible in the reserves, whereas large-scale industrial agriculture is generally not.) Natura 2000 now protects mixed forests in Romania, heathlands in Germany, bogs in Sweden, and desert-like vegetation in Spain, among other landscapes and marine areas. Despite Germany's high density of industry, farms, and cities, 15 percent of the country is included in the Natura 2000 network.

According to the EU commission, the network has grown from 47.5 million acres in the mid-1990s to seven times that size today, representing an area equivalent in size to France, Germany, and Italy combined. Nine percent of Natura 2000 reserves are larger than 25,000 acres, like the Sierra Norte reserve in southern Spain, which covers more than 700,000 acres. Other areas are only a few acres in size, owing to the fragmented nature of Europe's landscape.

Any actions that endanger protected species or impact vegetation types negatively are generally outlawed. Before a building or infrastructure project is approved or farming operations can be extended, authorities ask for proof that protected species and habitats will not be damaged or that damage will be reversed through ecological restoration. In Germany, for example, an extra tunnel had to be built for a new motorway — at a cost of more 44 million euros ($48 million) — to protect newts.

The EU commission is calling the Natura 2000 review a "fitness check” and Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the EU commission, has personally ordered the review. But Sorges and other European environmentalists are worried that it will lead to a rollback in protections. "We fear that this review process is an outright attack on our high legal standards," says Sorges. More than 500,000 members of conservation groups like Friends of the Earth Europe and WWF have used an online consultation process,
Critics say Natura 2000 rules are too strict and so vague that they delay investments and choke the economy.
which ended in July, to express their concerns.

As Europe struggles to emerge from its ongoing financial crisis, critics of Natura 2000 contend that the current rules are too strict and often so vague that they delay investments and choke the economy while ecological assessments are carried out. Along the German coast, for example, wharf owners fear limits for using large ships on rivers that are protected under Natura 2000. Farmers near the German city of Göttingen are expressing worries that protected areas will be steadily enlarged, limiting their operations. Forest owners are asking the EU to consider their incomes rather than focus solely on conservation targets.

"We feel that the main question should be how to strike the right balance between ensuring sustainability and nature conservation and being economically viable," says Pekka Pesonen, secretary general of the farmer association Copa-Cogeca, who has criticized bureaucratic red tape that makes it hard for farmers to be profitable.

Business groups like CEEP, the European Center of Enterprises, and Euromines, the mining industry's lobby group, see the fitness check as an opportunity to change the directives to make them more business-friendly. European business groups don't attack nature conservation per se, because this would not go down well with their customers. No specific proposals have been made yet on changing the Natura 2000 directives, but officials say it is possible that protection status for species or habitat types may be loosened, that exemptions for commercial or agricultural activity may be increased, or that resources for implementing the current rules or overseeing enforcement may be reduced. Final decisions about a possible reform will take place in 2016.

The genesis of Natura 2000 goes back to 1979, when the EU passed a Birds Directive that granted protection to hundreds of species of birds. In 1992, the EU approved a Habitats Directive that gave special legal status to 1,000 additional species of mammals, insects, and plants, and to 230 specified vegetation types like mires and mountain meadows. The two directives oblige EU states to protect the species and habitat types in the reserves of the Natura 2000 network.

Conservationists and researchers say the current directives are a success story.
‘The directives have saved millions of migratory birds from certain death,’ says one expert.

“The directives have saved millions of migratory birds from certain death and have helped to conserve numerous national treasures,” says Olaf Tschimpke, president of the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union. The group cites the example of the Rospuda Valley in eastern Poland, a 29,000-acre wetland that was threatened by a large-scale road-building project. "The directives prevented the destruction and actually helped to find a more suitable route," says Konstantin Kreiser, head of NABU’s international biodiversity policy.

Dirk Schmeller, a wildlife ecologist from the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research in Leipzig, says that studies conducted by his groups clearly document that the EU's directives and the Natura 2000 network have helped to preserve and improve the biological diversity of Europe. "Some protected areas are too small to be effective and some groups of organisms like fish are poorly represented, but fundamentally the directives and Natura 2000 are a success story," says Schmeller.

A recent scientific assessment for the EU commission, State of Nature in the EU, analyzed the performance of the birds and habitats directives from 2007 to 2012. The authors concluded that the status of more than half of all 450 wild bird species assessed (52 percent) was secure, while 17 percent of the species were still threatened and another 15 percent were near-threatened, declining, or depleted. (The status could not be determined for 16 percent.) The roseate tern and the eastern imperial eagle, for example, have recovered from earlier declines. A similar recovery is under way for some of the 300 protected plant species endemic to the EU, like the flower Senecio nevadensis from the Sierra Nevada range in southern Spain.

The report warns, however, that a majority of habitat types are under intense pressure from agriculture, development projects, and nitrogen pollution, and that positive effects from the protection efforts need more time to play out. Dominique Richard of the National Museum of Natural History in Paris says that Natura 2000 gives threatened species and habitats time and space to recover, thus contributing to the EU's


A Successful Push to Restore
Europe’s Long-Abused Rivers

Polar water acidification
From Britain to the Czech Republic, European nations have been restoring rivers to their natural state — taking down dams, removing levees, and reviving floodplains. For a continent that long viewed rivers as little more than shipping canals and sewers, it is a striking change.
international commitment to halt the loss of its biodiversity by 2020.

Karmenu Vella, the EU environment commissioner, has lauded the birds and habitat directives as an important contribution to "stemming the further decline of Europe’s most vulnerable species and habitat types, in spite of the ever-increasing demand for land and resources." Vella's predecessor estimated that the Natura 2000 network created economic benefits worth 200 to 300 billion euros per year through providing fresh water, carbon storage, pollinating insects, flood protection, and opportunities for tourism and recreation.

So far, the Tegeler Fliess protected area in Berlin is unaffected by the political controversy. Hundreds of visitors come to the area every day to relax and enjoy a taste of nature close to the city. They can observe rare birds like red-backed shrikes and whinchats, cycle through woods on marked paths, or relax in picnic areas along lakes. But Sorges of the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union is worried that this idyllic scenery is in danger.

"If the EU's conservation rules are loosened, we might have to defend the area against the current building boom in Berlin," she says.

POSTED ON 31 Aug 2015 IN Biodiversity Biodiversity Climate Forests Urbanization Europe North America 


A wonderful success story – we need more such
analyses and more widespread sharing of such
efforts. And yet despite success (on a number of
scales and across many levels), we ought not be
surprised business interests and real estate
speculators masquerading as farmers are
leading the effort to “review and evaluate,”
meaning undercut and eviscerate protection
measures to enable more development. Habitat
is critical to the extent it is degraded or
destroyed the loss of species is inevitable. A
system of interconnected reserves presents the
best opportunity to provide for the need of
species to exist and recover. European efforts to
create Natura 2000 are to be commended and

As Lenin once quipped, treaties [like laws in this
case] are mere scraps of paper. Some business
interests and their bought and paid for
government representatives will stop at nothing
to perpetuate the growth and development
machine. Can the economic benefits of
dismantling or degrading Natura 2000 (likely to
accrue in only a few pockets) possibly be
weighed against the likely losses for the species
and humans who enjoy them? We are quickly
reaching a point where citizen passivity is a
recipe for disaster. People need to know and
understand what is at stake. Presumably,
positive (enlightened?) action will follow.

Posted by Kyle Gardner on 04 Sep 2015

"The European commission has now ordered a
“review” of the two main pillars of the protection
of our wildlife: the Birds directive and the
Habitats directive. It’s likely to be the kind of
review conducted by a large tracked vehicle with
a steel ball on the end of a chain. The problem,
the commission says, is that these directives
could impede the “fitness” of business in Europe.

But do they? Not even Edmund Stoiber, the
conservative former president of Bavaria who
was appointed by the commission to wage war
on regulation, thinks so. He discovered that
European environmental laws account for less
than 1% of the costs of regulation to business:
the lowest cost of any of the regulations he
investigated. “However, businesses perceive the
burden to be much higher in this area.”

The UK chancellor, George Osborne,claimed in
2011 that wildlife regulations were placing
ridiculous costs on business. But a review by the
environment secretary, Caroline Spelman,
concluded the claim was unfounded.

So if these crucial directives are vitiated or
scrapped, it will not be because they impede
business, but because they are wrongly
perceived to impose much greater costs than
they do.

In the UK, whose leading politicians, like those of
Australia and Canada, appear to be little more
than channels for corporate power, we are facing
a full-spectrum assault on the laws protecting our
living treasures."


+ one can add the waste of food, etc. etc.
Posted by Vilku Miks on 19 Sep 2015


Comments are moderated and will be reviewed before they are posted to ensure they are on topic, relevant, and not abusive. They may be edited for length and clarity. By filling out this form, you give Yale Environment 360 permission to publish this comment.

Email address 
Please type the text shown in the graphic.

christian schwagerlABOUT THE AUTHOR
Christian Schwägerl is a Berlin-based journalist who writes for GEO magazine, the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine, and other media outlets. He is the author of the book The Anthropocene — The Human Era and How it Shapes Our Planet, which was published in English in 2014, and he is active on Twitter. Previously for Yale Environment 360, Schwägerl reported on efforts in Europe to tackle nitrogen pollution and Germany's struggle to end coal use.



The Moth Snowstorm: Finding
True Value in Nature’s Riches

Journalist Michael McCarthy has chronicled the loss of wildlife in his native Britain and globally. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, he talks about why he believes a new defense of the natural world is needed – one based on the joy and spiritual connection it provides for humans.

In New Ozone Alert, A Warning
Of Harm to Plants and to People

Scientists are still trying to unravel the damaging effects of ground-level ozone on life on earth. But as the world warms, their concerns about the impact of this highly toxic, pollution-caused gas are growing.

For A Bird Nearing Extinction,
An Indian Doctor Seeks a Cure

Numbers of the great Indian bustard are down to about 250, the result of hunting and habitat loss. But a young physician-turned-conservationist is working with herders in the desert of northwest India to stop this magnificent bird’s slide into oblivion.

The Rising Environmental Toll
Of China’s Offshore Island Grab

To stake its claim in the strategic South China Sea, China is building airstrips, ports, and other facilities on disputed islands and reefs. Scientists say the activities are destroying key coral reef ecosystems and will heighten the risks of a fisheries collapse in the region.

High Stakes on the High Seas:
A Call for International Reserves

Marine protected areas in national waters have proven successful in helping depleted fish stocks to recover. Now, there is growing momentum for the creation of extensive reserves on the high seas as a way of reversing decades of rampant overfishing.


MORE IN Reports

For European Wind Industry,
Offshore Projects Are Booming

by christian schwägerl
As Europe’s wind energy production rises dramatically, offshore turbines are proliferating from the Irish Sea to the Baltic Sea. It’s all part of the European Union’s strong push away from fossil fuels and toward renewables.

In New Ozone Alert, A Warning
Of Harm to Plants and to People

by jim robbins
Scientists are still trying to unravel the damaging effects of ground-level ozone on life on earth. But as the world warms, their concerns about the impact of this highly toxic, pollution-caused gas are growing.

The Rising Environmental Toll
Of China’s Offshore Island Grab

by mike ives
To stake its claim in the strategic South China Sea, China is building airstrips, ports, and other facilities on disputed islands and reefs. Scientists say the activities are destroying key coral reef ecosystems and will heighten the risks of a fisheries collapse in the region.

Natural Aquaculture: Can We
Save Oceans by Farming Them?

by richard schiffman
A small but growing number of entrepreneurs are creating sea-farming operations that cultivate shellfish together with kelp and seaweed, a combination they contend can restore ecosystems and mitigate the impacts of ocean acidification.

High Stakes on the High Seas:
A Call for International Reserves

by nicola jones
Marine protected areas in national waters have proven successful in helping depleted fish stocks to recover. Now, there is growing momentum for the creation of extensive reserves on the high seas as a way of reversing decades of rampant overfishing.

For China’s Polluted Megacities,
A Focus on Slashing Emissions

by mike ives
The booming industrial center of Shenzhen is a showcase for Chinese efforts to cut CO2 emissions and make the nation's burgeoning cities more livable. But it remains to be seen whether China's runaway industrial development can give way to a low-carbon future.

Rocky Flats: A Wildlife Refuge
Confronts Its Radioactive Past

by fred pearce
The Rocky Flats Plant outside Denver was a key U.S. nuclear facility during the Cold War. Now, following a $7 billion cleanup, the government is preparing to open a wildlife refuge on the site to the public, amid warnings from some scientists that residual plutonium may still pose serious health risks.

Pressure Mounts to Reform Our
Throwaway Clothing Culture

by marc gunther
Americans dispose of about 12.8 million tons of textiles annually — 80 pounds for each man, woman, and child. In the U.S. and around the world, a growing number of environmentalists and clothing industry executives say it’s time to end the wasteful clothing culture and begin making new apparel out of old items on a large scale.

The New Green Grid: Utilities
Deploy ‘Virtual Power Plants’

by maria gallucci
By linking together networks of energy-efficient buildings, solar installations, and batteries, a growing number of companies in the U.S. and Europe are helping utilities reduce energy demand at peak hours and supply targeted areas with renewably generated electricity.

Sticker Shock: The Soaring Costs
Of Germany’s Nuclear Shutdown

by joel stonington
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s 2011 decision to rapidly phase out the country’s 17 nuclear power reactors has left the government and utilities with a massive challenge: How to clean up and store large amounts of nuclear waste and other radioactive material.

e360 digest
Yale Environment 360 is
a publication of the
Yale School of Forestry
& Environmental Studies


Donate to Yale Environment 360
Yale Environment 360 Newsletter



About e360
Submission Guidelines

E360 en Español

Universia partnership
Yale Environment 360 articles are now available in Spanish and Portuguese on Universia, the online educational network.
Visit the site.


e360 Digest
Video Reports


Business & Innovation
Policy & Politics
Pollution & Health
Science & Technology


Antarctica and the Arctic
Central & South America
Middle East
North America

e360 VIDEO

A look at how acidifying oceans could threaten the Dungeness crab, one of the most valuable fisheries on the U.S. West Coast.
Watch the video.


The latest
from Yale
Environment 360
is now available for mobile devices at e360.yale.edu/mobile.


An aerial view of why Europe’s per capita carbon emissions are less than 50 percent of those in the U.S.
View the photos.

e360 VIDEO

An indigenous tribe’s deadly fight to save its ancestral land in the Amazon rainforest from logging.
Learn more.

e360 VIDEO

Food waste
An e360 video series looks at the staggering amount of food wasted in the U.S. – a problem with major human and environmental costs.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Choco rainforest Cacao
Residents of the Chocó Rainforest in Ecuador are choosing to plant cacao over logging in an effort to slow deforestation.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Tribal people and ranchers join together to stop a project that would haul coal across their Montana land.
Watch the video.