25 Jan 2016: Analysis

How ‘Natural Geoengineering’
Can Help Slow Global Warming

An overlooked tool in fighting climate change is enhancing biodiversity to maximize the ability of ecosystems to store carbon. Key to that strategy is preserving top predators to control populations of herbivores, whose grazing reduces the amount of CO2 that ecosystems absorb.

by oswald j. schmitz

As natural wonders go, perhaps the most awe-inspiring is the annual migration of 1.2 million wildebeest flowing across East Africa’s vast Serengeti grassland. It would be a tragedy to lose these animals. But we almost did in the mid-20th century when, decimated by disease and poaching, their numbers crashed to 300,000.

The consequences of that collapse were profound. Much of the Serengeti ecosystem remained ungrazed. The accumulating dead and dried grass in turn became fuel for massive wildfires, which annually burned up to 80 percent of the area, making the Serengeti an important regional source of carbon dioxide emissions.

Wildebeest Migration

Photo by Oleg Znamenskiy via Shutterstock
The annual wildebeest migration in Kenya.
Then, conservation programs to eradicate disease and crack down on poaching led to the recovery of the wildebeest, restoring the grazing system and reversing the extent of the large-scale wildfires. Grazing now causes much of the carbon in grass to be released as animal dung, which is in turn incorporated by insects into soil reservoirs that are not prone to burning. The Serengeti ecosystem has now reverted to a carbon dioxide sink so large that it is estimated to offset all of East Africa’s current annual fossil fuel carbon emissions.

The wildebeest decline and recovery taught a valuable lesson, not only in how easy it is to loose an iconic animal species, but, more importantly, how the loss of a single species can have far-reaching ramifications for ecosystems — and the climate. Mounting evidence from ecological science is showing that one or a few animal species can help determine the amount of carbon that is exchanged between ecosystems and the atmosphere. It’s not that any single animal species by itself has a huge direct effect on the carbon budget. Rather, as the wildebeest case shows, by being an integral part of a larger food chain the species may trigger knock-on effects that grow through the chain to drive significant amounts of carbon into long-term storage on land or in the ocean.

Recent studies have shown, for example that the loss of important predators — from wolves in boreal forests to sharks in seagrass meadows — can lead to growing populations of terrestrial and marine herbivores, whose widespread grazing reduces the ability of ecosystems to absorb carbon. Still, the impact of biodiversity loss on the climate system is underappreciated, and reversing that loss is rarely considered as an effective tool to help slow the buildup of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Instead, the conversation often turns to the technological fixes known broadly as climate geoengineering. These schemes range from spraying sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect more solar energy back
A changing mindset sees animal species as important drivers of the climate ship.
into space, to fertilizing the ocean with pulverized iron to stimulate blooms of phytoplankton that take up carbon during photosynthesis and carry it to the ocean floor when they die. Sold with slogans like “give me a tanker ship full of iron and I’ll give you the next ice age,” these claims breed angst rather than action. But if in our ignorance we have already messed up the climate system by using technology, who would risk messing it up again with other technologies?

Hence the appeal of what might be called “natural geoengineering.” Natural ecological processes already offer many reliable and safe ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Currently, natural processes — such as photosynthesis by tropical trees and marine phytoplankton, and CO2 absorption by ocean waters — remove and store more than half of the carbon emissions generated by human activities. With thoughtful environmental stewardship there is the promise of doing more, and doing it in more environmentally friendly ways.

However, doing more requires a sea change in mindset. It entails conflating the climate issue with another environmental issue of global proportions — biodiversity conservation. Climate change is commonly viewed as causing collateral damage to biodiversity. Species, especially animals, are viewed as unwitting victims, passengers stuck on a ship that is headed on an ill-fated voyage. A changing mindset sees animal species as important drivers of the climate ship, so biodiversity management and conservation may be a key to fixing the climate change problem.

As always, the devil will be in the details, given that animal effects on carbon exchange may differ from ecosystem to ecosystem. But much headway can be made if species conservation moves beyond simply protecting species for their iconic or charismatic value and protecting them instead for the roles they play in ecosystems and the climate system. Doing this convincingly requires appreciating and knowing how these species fit into food chains, and how their loss can interfere with the ability of natural systems to sequester carbon.

Woodland caribou

Eliminating large carnivores leads to an overabundance of their prey species like caribou.
Take for instance the vast boreal forest region of northern Canada and Russia, which covers more than 10 percent of the earth’s land area. Boreal trees take carbon dioxide back from the atmosphere to produce stems and leaves and roots. But most of the carbon is not stored within living plant parts. Instead, it enters long-term storage in the soil as dead leaves, branches, and roots that are shed from the plants. The cool boreal soil conditions strongly limit soil microbes from breaking down organic matter and respiring it back to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. As a result, boreal forests are able to store more carbon than most other places on earth — twice as much as tropical forests. Estimates suggest that Canada’s boreal forests remove and store enough atmospheric carbon dioxide to offset all of that nation’s annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning. In the global carbon budget, this is not a trivial amount, as Canada is among the top 10 emitters of carbon dioxide.

This massive storage of CO2 is the result, in part, of intact food chains comprised of large carnivores like black bears and wolves, and herbivore prey like moose and woodland caribou that feed on trees. But this key benefit is overlooked by wildlife management agencies that are systematically culling bears and wolves out of concern that they threaten moose and caribou populations. Once released from predation pressure, moose populations can increase and over-browse growing trees. Estimates show that even a small rise in moose density from 0.5 to 1.5 animals per square kilometer, which is at the lower end of recorded moose densities for boreal forests, is sufficient to reduce soil carbon storage per unit area by 10 to 25 percent. Moreover, forest thinning by herbivores allows the soil to warm, creating the risk that enhanced microbial activity will cause boreal forests to become a net carbon source rather than a sink.

To keep pace with scientific advances, wildlife management officials and conservationists need to weigh the supposed benefits of eliminating threats by wolves or other carnivores against the impacts of increasing the
Developing natural geoengineering solutions requires research into the most promising and effective options.
abundance of their prey species. Until this happens, populations of large carnivores will continue to be disproportionately lost from many ecosystems due to habitat loss and extirpation arising from perceived conflicts with human values and livelihoods. Whether it is sharks, tigers, or dingoes, the absence of top predators can leave herbivore populations unchecked, with the attendant potential loss in carbon storage.

But there is hope and opportunity to reverse the decline of top predators and restore their populations. The clearest example is the story of the sea otter. After being hunted to the brink of extinction during the fur trade, legal protection and management efforts have helped sea otter populations to grow and rebuild coastal kelp forests by regulating herbivorous sea urchins that devastated these forests. Recovering sea otters to historic levels even just along the thin stretch of coastline from Vancouver Island to the western edge of the Aleutian Islands has created the potential to absorb and store 6 to10 percent of the annual carbon released from fossil fuel emissions in British Columbia, according to a study published in the journal Ecosystems.

More broadly, coastal ocean ecosystems offer some of the greatest opportunities for carbon storage. Salt marshes, seagrass meadows, mangroves, and continental shelves are some of the worlds’ most important carbon sinks. Often regulated by predator driven knock-on effects, these marine sinks can store carbon up to 40 times faster than tropical forests. But, overfishing of predatory fish and crabs in places like the saltmarshes of Cape Cod, Massachusetts has resulted in an explosion of herbivore crabs and snails, with large swaths of marsh dying off and subsequent erosion of tide-exposed sediments. Along with this comes the loss of hundreds of years of stored carbon, as well as the loss of future CO2-absorption potential.

On continental shelves, fish and invertebrates such as starfish and sea cucumbers, precipitate carbonate minerals in their intestines as a byproduct of physiological processes to prevent excess calcium assimilation into their bodies. Globally, this annual carbonate production and release to the ocean floor as waste is estimated to equal the annual fossil fuel carbon emissions by such countries as Brazil, the UK, or Australia. But marine fisheries globally have cut down this carbonate production potential. It is perhaps time to rethink marine fisheries management by setting quotas based on weighing the societal benefits of seafood harvests against the societal costs of lost carbon-storage potential.


What’s Causing Deadly Outbreaks of
Fungal Diseases in World’s Wildlife?

An unprecedented global wave of virulent fungal infections is decimating whole groups of animals — from salamanders and frogs, to snakes and bats. While scientists are still trying to understand the causes, they are pointing to intercontinental travel, the pet trade, and degraded habitat as likely factors, Elizabeth Kolbert writes.
There are many more examples of animal-driven effects that hold the promise of increasing carbon storage across many different species and ecosystems. The potential magnitudes of these effects are on the same order as conventional land management activities, such as reforestation or planting new forests — policies that are increasingly being promoted as environmentally friendly alternatives to technological geoengineering. Humans already manage populations of many animals for other purposes, so expanding consideration to carbon dynamics, while representing a shift in management goals, would not involve a radical shift in management approach.

Developing natural geo-engineering solutions requires research into how to make the most promising options effective and cost-efficient. The rub is that individual animal species tend to occur regionally, not globally. This means that we need to shy away from trying to find the single, global-scale, home run, geo-engineering solution and seek more regionally nuanced alternatives. This approach would take into account the values and preferences of local societies and would allow regional players to reconcile their particular concerns and values with broader climate solutions. The many local and regional strategies then add up globally to create a portfolio of solutions that together can meaningfully help slow climate change.

POSTED ON 25 Jan 2016 IN Biodiversity Biodiversity Climate Forests Policy & Politics Africa Central & South America North America 


Nice analysis.Of course transforming the fossil
fueled, soil destroying modern agriculture to
regenerative agriculture is equally as important.
Posted by ROBERT METTERS on 26 Jan 2016

Not sure the term "natural geoengineering" is so
great, but it is good to see the idea of natural
ecosystem regeneration given consideration in the
climate context. Very refreshing after the barrage of
technofix make-believe that is reflected by many,
such as a previous post here by Tim Flannery.

Nature will know what the best opportunities are
better than we will - all we need to do is stop the
Posted by Rachel Smolker on 26 Jan 2016

" Nature will know what the best
opportunities are "

Yale still teaches entelechy - who knew ?

Posted by Russell Seitz on 26 Jan 2016

Having worked at Conservation International for 12 years promoting what is now called REDD+, I referred to it as "Ecosystem Carbon Storage," to contrast with the fixation on fossil fuel Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). I enjoyed your examples. One thought on the Boreal region has to do with the significantly higher warming being experienced in the Boreal region, and the increasing probability of soil warming changing microbial activity that may undermine long-term carbon accumulation.
Posted by Michael Totten on 26 Jan 2016

Thanks for this article, natural marine solutions exist and are bring developed, see 'blue forests' (www.gefblueforests.com) and 'fish carbon' (www.grida.no/publications/fish-carbon)
Posted by Steven Lutz on 27 Jan 2016

But perhaps the term 'natural geoengineering' is
apt afterall because the idea would be--as it is
arguably implied in the article--to geoengineer
nature in a whole-sale fashion: reforest, restock
and so on which actually doesn't sound like
geoengineering nature but wholesale restoration.
But where we might go wrong because we might
just not know enough, is in our attempts to
restore large-scale complex natural interactions
like the ones the author was talking about--the
interconnections between big game, vegetation
and microbes. Or do these take care of
themselves once the replanting and the
restocking is accomplished?

At any rate, I also found this analysis quite
enlightening--revealing even, however much you
could say it is obvious (or precisely because).
Posted by Günter Weinberg on 29 Jan 2016

Carbon Release to the Atmosphere

Very interesting and profound article however, Wildlife Management and the interjection into management of tropical forests is likely best left to nature. The slaughter of forests for renewable energy and pellet production for export is likely one of the most destructive endeavors undertaken by homo sapiens in human history. The burning of wood and its harvest likely produce nearly double the output of CO2 over burning, for example, a cleaner grade coal. The damage to the forest floor, by harvesting operations, releasing huge quantities of carbon is a largely overlooked factor. Large quantities of CO2 and pollutants are also released in the wood drying process.

The extraction of soil minerals and nutrients through wood harvesting for export is another huge negative. It is estimated that roughly 2.5 billion people in developing countries rely mostly on wood for cooking and space heating, producing very significant quantities of CO2 while destroying carbon sequestration potential. It appears timely to return to the drawing board for mitigating the CO2 impact. The renewable energy exemption needs to be revisited with extreme urgency.
Posted by Kjell E Berg on 29 Jan 2016

Thank you for this illustrative summary. Connecting issues of climate change, biodiversity conservation and human impacts on the environment to the ultimate human challenge of creating a sustainable world for people and all species -- should be at the core of education and reform policy. Again, thank you.
Posted by Fred Koontz on 30 Jan 2016

All for natural geoengineering, especially
enhancement of the highest capacity and most
effective natural method of all - mineral weathering
Why trust the fate of the planet to water-, nutrient-,
and land intensive- (not to mention C leaky-)
Posted by Greg Rau on 30 Jan 2016

Thank you for writing this article. It is good to see
the connection between the mass extinction event
currently underway and the climate change crisis
being made and how they feed in to each other. I
hope more efforts continue to be made to restore
natural processes and it does not veer into
controlling natural processes. The only way Earth
will be saved is if humanity begins working
together with nature in partnership. After all
humans are a part of nature and one never wins
when one fights against themselves.

Posted by human1nature on 31 Jan 2016

Thank You for sharing this perspective.

As a an environmental educator and landscape
designer, I have been advocating for a new
perspective on human relationships with nature.

We have the capacity to be a positive force.

Increasing biodiversity, building topsoil and
developing habitat are all simple and empowering
tasks that can be accomplished in small
urban/suburban lots. Its as easy as sheet
mulching your lawn and planting some crocosmia
then watching the hummingbirds feed where they
were not feeding before.

Contemporary environmental discourse focuses too
much on doing "less bad".
Lets start doing good for our natural systems.

Please keep up this positive approach to
human/nature relations.
Posted by Paul Kearsley on 31 Jan 2016

This was a very lengthy and wonderful article.
Posted by Cool Dude on 02 Feb 2016

An erudite analysis. The basic premise being that
herbivores whose grazing reduces the amount of C02
that ecosystems absorb, it begs the question of a
massive global animal industry which contributes to
52\% of global warming as reported by the UN (in
contrast to natural ecosystems as described above).
As a layman I wonder if scientists are engaged in
addressing this major global dilemna, or are leaving
it to the forces of supply and demand? It is too
tough, or too dangerous an issue to confront?
Posted by Andrew Lawson Kerr on 03 Feb 2016


Yes animal husbandry is problematic and more
complex because it conflates the effects of two
greenhouse gasses: methane, directly released
from ruminant animals with CO2 released from
growing crops to feed animals. You are right that
this also an effect that needs to be accounted and
and issue that needs to be confronted.

Posted by Os Schmitz on 04 Feb 2016

How much of the world's herbivore biomass consists
of domestic cattle?
Posted by SqueakyRat on 26 Jun 2016

At last! Someone who unadrstends! Thanks for posting!
Posted by Cordelia on 10 Nov 2016


Comments are moderated and will be reviewed before they are posted to ensure they are on topic, relevant, and not abusive. They may be edited for length and clarity. By filling out this form, you give Yale Environment 360 permission to publish this comment.

Email address 
Please type the text shown in the graphic.

oswald j. schmitzABOUT THE AUTHOR
Oswald J. Schmitz is the Oastler Professor of Population and Community Ecology at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies and the director of the Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies. Previously, he wrote for Yale Environment 360 about how the demands of technology are linked to global mining.



As Chinese Luxury Market Grows,
An Upsurge in Tiger Killings in India

Poachers killed more tigers in the forests of India in 2016 than any year in the last 15. The spike is linked to demand for tiger parts in China, where the endangered animal’s bones and skins are regarded as exotic luxury items.

Aimed at Refugees, Fences Are
Threatening European Wildlife

A flood of migrants from the Middle East and Africa has prompted governments in the Balkans to erect hundreds of miles of border fences. Scientists say the expanding network of barriers poses a serious threat to wildlife, especially wide-ranging animals such as bears and wolves.

How Forensics Are Boosting
Battle Against Wildlife Trade

From rapid genetic analysis to spectrography, high-tech tools are being used to track down and prosecute perpetrators of the illegal wildlife trade. The new advances in forensics offer promise in stopping the trafficking in endangered species.

Wildlife Farming: Does It Help
Or Hurt Threatened Species?

Wildlife farming is being touted as a way to protect endangered species while providing food and boosting incomes in rural areas. But some conservation scientists argue that such practices fail to benefit beleaguered wildlife.

Rocky Flats: A Wildlife Refuge
Confronts Its Radioactive Past

The Rocky Flats Plant outside Denver was a key U.S. nuclear facility during the Cold War. Now, following a $7 billion cleanup, the government is preparing to open a wildlife refuge on the site to the public, amid warnings from some scientists that residual plutonium may still pose serious health risks.


MORE IN Analysis

How Far Can Technology Go
To Stave Off Climate Change?

by david biello
With carbon dioxide emissions continuing to rise, an increasing number of experts believe major technological breakthroughs —such as CO2 air capture — will be necessary to slow global warming. But without the societal will to decarbonize, even the best technologies won’t be enough.

With Trump, China Emerges
As Global Leader on Climate

by isabel hilton
With Donald Trump threatening to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, China is ready to assume leadership of the world’s climate efforts. For China, it is a matter of self-interest – reducing the choking pollution in its cities and seizing the economic opportunities of a low-carbon future.

What a Trump Win Means
For the Global Climate Fight

by david victor
Donald Trump’s ascension to the presidency signals an end to American leadership on international climate policy. With the withdrawal of U.S. support, efforts to implement the Paris agreement and avoid the most devastating consequences of global warming have suffered a huge blow.

The Methane Riddle: What Is
Causing the Rise in Emissions?

by fred pearce
The cause of the rapid increase in methane emissions since 2007 has puzzled scientists. But new research finds some surprising culprits in the methane surge and shows that fossil-fuel sources have played a much larger role over time than previously estimated.

As Arctic Ocean Ice Disappears,
Global Climate Impacts Intensify

by peter wadhams
The top of the world is turning from white to blue in summer as the ice that has long covered the north polar seas melts away. This monumental change is triggering a cascade of effects that will amplify global warming and could destabilize the global climate system.

How Climate Change Could Jam
The World's Ocean Circulation

by nicola jones
Scientists are closely monitoring a key current in the North Atlantic to see if rising sea temperatures and increased freshwater from melting ice are altering the “ocean conveyor belt” — a vast oceanic stream that plays a major role in the global climate system.

Wildlife Farming: Does It Help
Or Hurt Threatened Species?

by richard conniff
Wildlife farming is being touted as a way to protect endangered species while providing food and boosting incomes in rural areas. But some conservation scientists argue that such practices fail to benefit beleaguered wildlife.

What Would a Global Warming
Increase of 1.5 Degrees Be Like?

by fred pearce
The Paris climate conference set the ambitious goal of finding ways to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, rather than the previous threshold of 2 degrees. But what would be the difference between a 1.5 and 2 degree world? And how realistic is such a target?

After Paris, A Move to Rein In
Emissions by Ships and Planes

by fred pearce
As the world moves to slash CO2 emissions, the shipping and aviation sectors have managed to remain on the sidelines. But the pressure is now on these two major polluting industries to start controlling their emissions at last.

Abrupt Sea Level Rise Looms
As Increasingly Realistic Threat

by nicola jones
Ninety-nine percent of the planet's freshwater ice is locked up in the Antarctic and Greenland ice caps. Now, a growing number of studies are raising the possibility that as those ice sheets melt, sea levels could rise by six feet this century, and far higher in the next, flooding many of the world's populated coastal areas.

e360 digest
Yale Environment 360 is
a publication of the
Yale School of Forestry
& Environmental Studies


Donate to Yale Environment 360
Yale Environment 360 Newsletter



About e360
Submission Guidelines

E360 en Español

Universia partnership
Yale Environment 360 articles are now available in Spanish and Portuguese on Universia, the online educational network.
Visit the site.


e360 Digest
Video Reports


Business & Innovation
Policy & Politics
Pollution & Health
Science & Technology


Antarctica and the Arctic
Central & South America
Middle East
North America

e360 VIDEO

A look at how acidifying oceans could threaten the Dungeness crab, one of the most valuable fisheries on the U.S. West Coast.
Watch the video.


The latest
from Yale
Environment 360
is now available for mobile devices at e360.yale.edu/mobile.


An aerial view of why Europe’s per capita carbon emissions are less than 50 percent of those in the U.S.
View the photos.

e360 VIDEO

An indigenous tribe’s deadly fight to save its ancestral land in the Amazon rainforest from logging.
Learn more.

e360 VIDEO

Food waste
An e360 video series looks at the staggering amount of food wasted in the U.S. – a problem with major human and environmental costs.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Choco rainforest Cacao
Residents of the Chocó Rainforest in Ecuador are choosing to plant cacao over logging in an effort to slow deforestation.
Watch the video.

e360 VIDEO

Tribal people and ranchers join together to stop a project that would haul coal across their Montana land.
Watch the video.