The Wall Street Journal analyzes the contrasting energy policies of U.S. presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama and concludes that while both tout themselves as environmentally friendly, their administrations would pursue very different approaches. Both candidates talk about reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil and combating global warming. But McCain does not favor using large government subsidies to stimulate development of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind. He does, however, support increasing federal financial incentives for nuclear power. In contrast, Obama favors spending $150 billion in federal funds over the next decade to spur research and development of alternative energy technologies. He supports a larger role for nuclear power, which now provides about 20 percent of the U.S.’s electricity, but says no such expansion should take place until the country comes up with a safe, long-term solution to disposing of nuclear waste.
Different Shades of Green: The Energy Policies of Obama and McCain
More From E360
-
Solutions
Birds vs. Wind Turbines: New Research Aims to Prevent Deaths
-
FORESTS
Cambodian Forest Defenders at Risk for Exposing Illegal Logging
-
OPINION
The ‘Green’ Aviation Fuel That Would Increase Carbon Emissions
-
CONSERVATION
Out of the Wild: How A.I. Is Transforming Conservation Science
-
Energy
China’s Mega Dam Project Poses Big Risks for Asia’s Grand Canyon
-
Solutions
How Natural Solutions Can Help Islands Survive Sea Level Rise
-
INTERVIEW
Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans?
-
Biodiversity
In Mexico’s ‘Avocado Belt,’ Villagers Stand Up to Protect Their Lands
-
Food & Agriculture
How Herbicide Drift from Farms Is Harming Trees in Midwest
-
Policy
U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
-
INTERVIEW
How a Former Herder Protected Mongolia’s Vast Grasslands
-
Solutions
A.I. Is Quietly Powering a Revolution in Weather Prediction