The Wall Street Journal analyzes the contrasting energy policies of U.S. presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama and concludes that while both tout themselves as environmentally friendly, their administrations would pursue very different approaches. Both candidates talk about reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil and combating global warming. But McCain does not favor using large government subsidies to stimulate development of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind. He does, however, support increasing federal financial incentives for nuclear power. In contrast, Obama favors spending $150 billion in federal funds over the next decade to spur research and development of alternative energy technologies. He supports a larger role for nuclear power, which now provides about 20 percent of the U.S.’s electricity, but says no such expansion should take place until the country comes up with a safe, long-term solution to disposing of nuclear waste.
Different Shades of Green: The Energy Policies of Obama and McCain
More From E360
-
CONFLICT
In War-Torn Sudan, a Gold Mining Boom Takes a Human Toll
-
Opinion
With NOAA Cuts, a Proud Legacy and Vital Science Are at Risk
-
Biodiversity
Imperiled in the Wild, Many Plants May Survive Only in Gardens
-
Climate
Can Toxic Mining Waste Help Remove CO2 from the Atmosphere?
-
INTERVIEW
Saving U.S. Climate and Environmental Data Before It Goes Away
-
Biodiversity
A Craze for Tiny Plants Is Driving a Poaching Crisis in South Africa
-
INTERVIEW
Bill McKibben on Climate Activism in the Age of Trump 2.0
-
Climate
How Climate Change Puts the Safety of Drinking Water at Risk
-
Energy
‘Green Grab’: Solar and Wind Boom Sparks Conflicts on Land Use
-
INTERVIEW
Reciprocity: Rethinking Our Relationship with the Natural World
-
Oceans
With Sea Ice Melting, Killer Whales Are Moving Into the Arctic
-
Cities
As War Halts, the Environmental Devastation in Gaza Runs Deep