The Wall Street Journal analyzes the contrasting energy policies of U.S. presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama and concludes that while both tout themselves as environmentally friendly, their administrations would pursue very different approaches. Both candidates talk about reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil and combating global warming. But McCain does not favor using large government subsidies to stimulate development of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind. He does, however, support increasing federal financial incentives for nuclear power. In contrast, Obama favors spending $150 billion in federal funds over the next decade to spur research and development of alternative energy technologies. He supports a larger role for nuclear power, which now provides about 20 percent of the U.S.’s electricity, but says no such expansion should take place until the country comes up with a safe, long-term solution to disposing of nuclear waste.
Different Shades of Green: The Energy Policies of Obama and McCain
More From E360
-
INTERVIEW
How to Grow a Forest: It Takes More Than Just Planting Trees
-
Solutions
Greening Concrete: A Major Emitter Inches Toward Carbon Neutrality
-
INTERVIEW
As Disinformation Swirls, Meteorologists Are Facing Threats
-
Biodiversity
Ukraine Rewilding: Will Nature Be Allowed to Revive When War Ends?
-
Oceans
Researchers Parse the Future of Plankton in an Ever-Warmer World
-
Climate
What’s Causing the Recent Spike in Global Temperatures?
-
Biodiversity
How Traffickers Got Away with the Biggest Rosewood Heist in History
-
INTERVIEW
Why We Need a Strong Global Agreement on Plastics Pollution
-
Food & Agriculture
On Navajo Lands, Ancient Ways Are Restoring the Parched Earth
-
Energy
Why Taiwan and Its Tech Industry Are Facing an Energy Crisis
-
PHOTO ESSAY
Eye on the Fertile Crescent: Life Along the Mideast’s Fabled Rivers
-
Policy
Fortress Conservation: Can a Congo Tribe Return to Its Forest?