At his confirmation hearing, Steven Chu, President-elect Obama’s nominee to head the Department of Energy, backed away slightly from earlier statements in which he called for high gasoline taxes and said “coal is my worst nightmare.” Yet Chu, appearing before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, signaled a radical shift from the Bush era as he called for limited use of coal, eventual taxes on carbon, and a rapid shift to renewable energy. Chu, the Nobel Prize-winning director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said higher gas taxes were “off the table” during the current economic crisis but stated that an eventual tax on carbon would encourage conservation and a move to alternative energy. He said the growing use of coal is “a pretty bad dream,” called for accelerated research into carbon capture and storage, and warned that “if we continue on our current path, we run the risk of dramatic, disruptive changes to our climate in the lifetimes of our children and grandchildren.” Chu backed limited use of nuclear power and limited offshore drilling as part of a comprehensive energy package.
Energy Pick Softens StanceYet Still Signals Major Shifts on Policies
More From E360
-
OPINION
Trump’s Logging Push Thrusts a Dagger at the Heart of Wilderness
-
INTERVIEW
Pakistan’s Solar Revolution Is Bringing Power to the People
-
Food & Agriculture
In Uganda, Deadly Landslides Force an Agricultural Reckoning
-
Energy
Why U.S. Geothermal May Advance, Despite Political Headwinds
-
Food & Agriculture
In War Zones, a Race to Save Key Seeds Needed to Feed the World
-
Climate
Lightning Strikes the Arctic: What Will It Mean for the Far North?
-
RIVERS
A Win for Farmers and Tribes Brings New Hope to the Klamath
-
Solutions
Deconstructing Buildings: The Quest for New Life for Old Wood
-
NATURAL DEFENSES
How Restored Wetlands Can Protect Europe from Russian Invasion
-
Solutions
Birds vs. Wind Turbines: New Research Aims to Prevent Deaths
-
Biodiversity
Cambodian Forest Defenders at Risk for Exposing Illegal Logging
-
OPINION
The ‘Green’ Aviation Fuel That Would Increase Carbon Emissions