Mountain forests scorched by wildfires in the southwestern U.S. in recent years have failed to regenerate as forest ecosystems because of rising temperatures, decreased precipitation, and human intervention, according to a U.S. researcher. Speaking at an environmental conference this week in Colorado, Craig Allen, a research ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, described how since the mid-1990s the Southwest’s alpine forests have increasingly been replaced by grasslands and shrublands following fires, The New York Times reports. While southwestern fires in the distant past typically remained close to the forest floor — a natural cycle that prevented the overcrowding of trees — a combination of cattle devouring grassy surface vegetation, new government policies to prevent fires, and a drier climate have significantly altered this ecosystem. As a result, Allen said, forest fires now climb to the top of the canopy and the species that live in mountainous areas, including ponderosa pines and juniper, cannot regenerate as temperatures climb and precipitation decreases. “These forests did not evolve with this type of fire,” Allen said.
Forests in Southwest U.S. Fail to Regenerate After Fires, Study Says
More From E360
-
DISPATCH
How Illegal Mining Caused a Humanitarian Crisis in the Amazon
-
ANALYSIS
Microplastics Are Filling the Skies. Will They Affect the Climate?
-
CONSERVATION
Silencing Science: How Indonesia Is Censoring Wildlife Research
-
Energy
In Europe’s Clean Energy Transition, Industry Turns to Heat Pumps
-
INTERVIEW
Amazon Under Fire: The Long Struggle Against Brazil’s Land Barons
-
WATER
After Comeback, Southern Iraq’s Marshes Are Now Drying Up
-
Biodiversity
Sacred Groves: How the Spiritual Connection Helps Protect Nature
-
Energy
For U.S. Companies, the Race for the New EV Battery Is On
-
INTERVIEW
Forest Equity: What Indigenous People Want from Carbon Credits
-
Policy
Which Wetlands to Protect? Supreme Court Will Soon Decide
-
Cities
In Bolivia, Mercury Pollution Spreads Amid a Surge in Gold Mining
-
Biodiversity
The 30 Percent Goal: Is Bigger Always Better for Biodiversity?