The process by which the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certifies seafood as sustainable is too lenient and discretionary, allowing for “overly generous interpretations” from third-party certifiers and adjudicators, a new report says. Launched in 1997, the UK-based MSC administers a well known eco-labeling process to inform consumers which fisheries are sustainable and provide incentives for better fisheries management. But in an analysis of 19 formal complaints against the council, a group of researchers found that several of the fisheries that received the MSC’s “sustainable” label — accounting for 35 percent of labeled seafood — apparently do not meet the council’s standards. For example, they found that Canada’s longline fishery for swordfish resulted in an extraordinary amount of incidental bycatch of other species, with the annual catch of 20,000 swordfish also netting 100,000 sharks, 1,200 endangered loggerhead turtles, and 170 leatherback turtles, according to the report, published in the journal Biological Conservation.
Marine Council’s ‘Eco-Labeling’ Process Is Too Lenient, Report Says
More From E360
-
Biodiversity
Grim Dilemma: Should We Kill One Owl Species to Save Another?
-
INTERVIEW
On Gulf Coast, an Activist Rallies Her Community Against Gas Exports
-
Climate
With CO2 Levels Rising, World’s Drylands Are Turning Green
-
WATER
As World’s Springs Vanish, Ripple Effects Alter Ecosystems
-
Climate
The Race to Save Glacial Ice Records Before They Melt Away
-
INTERVIEW
Turning Brownfields to Blooming Meadows, With the Help of Fungi
-
Solutions
To Foil a Deadly Pest, Scientists Aim for a Beetle-Resistant Ash Tree
-
Climate
Could the Global Boom in Greenhouses Help Cool the Planet?
-
Biodiversity
In North Macedonia, an Ancient Lake Faces Modern Threats
-
Solutions
How a ‘Citizen Map’ Is Helping Brazil Prepare for Next Big Flood
-
ANALYSIS
A Key Court Ruling Could Weaken U.S. Environmental Protections
-
WILDLIFE
As ‘Zombie’ Deer Disease Spreads, Scientists Look for Answers