The use of nuclear power from 1971 to 2009 prevented more than 1.8 million premature deaths related to air pollution and 64 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, a new study says. Using historical production data and estimates of mortality per unit of electricity generated, scientists from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University calculated that replacing nuclear energy sources with fossil fuel-burning sources during that period would have caused about 1.84 million premature deaths. By midcentury, they project, nuclear power could prevent an additional 420,000 to 7 million deaths, depending on which fossil fuels it replaces, and 80 to 240 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions. “By contrast, we assess that large-scale expansion of unconstrained natural gas use would not mitigate the climate problem and would cause far more deaths than the expansion of nuclear power,” said Pushker A. Kharecha, who, along with NASA’s James Hansen, co-authored the study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology. The study calculated that nuclear power plant accidents caused about 4,900 deaths during the same period.
Nuclear Power Has Prevented 1.84 Million Premature Deaths, Study Says
More From E360
-
Climate
As Temperatures Rise, Dengue Fever Spreads and Cases Rise
-
OPINION
Clearing Skies: Opening a New Path on Climate and the Future
-
Food & Agriculture
After the Storm, Malawi’s Farmers Face a Precarious Future
-
Policy
Shifting Political Winds Threaten Progress on Europe’s Green Goals
-
OPINION
Uncounted Emissions: The Hidden Cost of Fossil Fuel Exports
-
Biodiversity
Can ‘Immortal’ Sequoias Survive the Ravages of Climate Change?
-
INTERVIEW
Ecosystems as Infrastructure: A New Way of Looking at Climate Resilience
-
ANALYSIS
As Climate Talks Near, Calls Mount for a ‘Phaseout’ of Fossil Fuels
-
OPINION
Without Warning: A Lack of Weather Stations Is Costing African Lives
-
Cities
As Bird Kills from Buildings Mount, Cities Look for Solutions
-
INTERVIEW
Why Native Women’s Voices Are Crucial to Saving Brazil’s Forests
-
ANALYSIS
Why Is Britain Retreating from Global Leadership on Climate Action?