With the United Nations Rio+20 summit on sustainable development set to open next Wednesday, negotiators from developing nations walked out of a key working group over disagreements with wealthier nations about funding environmentally responsible development and the transfer of green technology. As negotiators attempted to forge an agreement, the G77 bloc of developing nations, led by China, proposed that wealthy countries finance a global fund for sustainable development with an initial annual budget of $30 billion. But European Union nations said they were unable to afford that because most EU states faced an economic crisis. Luiz Alberto Figueiredo, of the Brazilian Foreign Ministry, rejected that argument, saying, “We cannot be held hostage to the retraction resulting from financial crises in rich countries.” As 130 world leaders (with the notable absence of the leaders of the U.S., Britain, and Germany) prepared to arrive, a top Brazilian diplomat lamented the summit’s disparate blocs, saying the traditional north-south divide was only one of many divisions.
Sharp Divisions Emerge As Rio+20 Negotiators Seek Consensus
More From E360
-
feature
A First Among Major Nations, India Is Industrializing With Solar
-
A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR
After Two Decades, E360’s Founder and Editor Is Moving On
-
Solutions
Restoring the Flow: A Milestone in the Revival of the Everglades
-
Climate
Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current
-
MINING
In Coal Country, Black Lung Surges as Federal Protections Stall
-
Biodiversity
Older and Wiser: How Elder Animals Help Species to Survive
-
Climate
Rusting Rivers: Alarm Grows Over Uptick in Acidic Arctic Waters
-
ANALYSIS
A More Troubling Picture of Sea Level Rise Is Coming into View
-
INTERVIEW
Why Protecting Flowering Plants Is Crucial to Our Future
-
OPINION
Trying Times: Keeping the Faith as Environmental Gains Are Lost
-
ANALYSIS
As It Boosts Renewables, China Still Can’t Break Its Coal Addiction
-
OPINION
Can America’s Wolves Survive an Onslaught of Political Attacks?