With demand for fossil fuels outpacing the growth of renewable energy technologies worldwide, the International Energy Agency suggests that fossil fuel subsidies worth $312 billion be realigned to develop cleaner alternatives. Although renewable energy has seen growth of 30 to 40 percent in recent years, 47 percent of new electricity demand worldwide over the last decade was met with coal-fired energy, according to agency’s first clean energy progress report. As of 2009, fossil fuels had received more than $312 billion in subsidies, compared with $57 billion for renewable energy. In some countries, aggressive policies have yielded progress in the deployment of renewable energy sources, according to the study. For example, at least 10 nations now have sizeable domestic markets for solar technology compared with just three a decade ago. But increased growth depends on increased incentives for private sector investment and market mechanisms, the report says. “We must see more ambitious, effective policies that respond to market signals while providing long-term, predictable support,” said Richard Jones, IEA deputy executive director.
Shift Fossil Fuel Subsidies To Support Green Energy, IEA Urges
More From E360
-
Solutions
How Natural Solutions Can Help Islands Survive Sea Level Rise
-
INTERVIEW
Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans?
-
Biodiversity
In Mexico’s ‘Avocado Belt,’ Villagers Stand Up to Protect Their Lands
-
Food & Agriculture
How Herbicide Drift from Farms Is Harming Trees in Midwest
-
Policy
U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
-
INTERVIEW
How a Former Herder Protected Mongolia’s Vast Grasslands
-
Solutions
A.I. Is Quietly Powering a Revolution in Weather Prediction
-
RIVERS
On a Dammed River, Amazon Villagers Fight to Restore the Flow
-
Biodiversity
With the Great Mussel Die-Off, Scientists Scramble for Answers
-
ANALYSIS
Recycling Nuclear Waste: A Win-Win or a Dangerous Gamble?
-
CONFLICT
In War-Torn Sudan, a Gold Mining Boom Takes a Human Toll
-
Opinion
With NOAA Cuts, a Proud Legacy and Vital Science Are at Risk