The Economist magazine says that the Lithuanian government erred when it agreed to shut down the aging yet “perfectly serviceable” nuclear power plant at Ignalina as a condition of joining the European Union.
By agreeing to close Ignalina in 2009 without winning approval for plans to build a more modern plant on the same site, the Economist says, the Lithuanians have bowed to a “neurotic strand of greenery” in Europe that will render the small, former Soviet state 90 percent dependent on energy from fossil fuels. The magazine notes that populist political parties may take power in Lithuania’s autumn elections and chose to ignore the agreement to close Ignalina, threatening the country’s entry into the EU.
Closing Nuclear Plant Roils Lithuania and European Union
More From E360
-
Energy
Why U.S. Geothermal May Advance, Despite Political Headwinds
-
Food & Agriculture
In War Zones, a Race to Save Key Seeds Needed to Feed the World
-
Climate
Lightning Strikes the Arctic: What Will It Mean for the Far North?
-
RIVERS
A Win for Farmers and Tribes Brings New Hope to the Klamath
-
Solutions
Deconstructing Buildings: The Quest for New Life for Old Wood
-
NATURAL DEFENSES
How Restored Wetlands Can Protect Europe from Russian Invasion
-
Solutions
Birds vs. Wind Turbines: New Research Aims to Prevent Deaths
-
FORESTS
Cambodian Forest Defenders at Risk for Exposing Illegal Logging
-
OPINION
The ‘Green’ Aviation Fuel That Would Increase Carbon Emissions
-
CONSERVATION
Out of the Wild: How A.I. Is Transforming Conservation Science
-
Energy
China’s Mega Dam Project Poses Big Risks for Asia’s Grand Canyon
-
Solutions
How Natural Solutions Can Help Islands Survive Sea Level Rise