The Economist magazine says that the Lithuanian government erred when it agreed to shut down the aging yet “perfectly serviceable” nuclear power plant at Ignalina as a condition of joining the European Union.
By agreeing to close Ignalina in 2009 without winning approval for plans to build a more modern plant on the same site, the Economist says, the Lithuanians have bowed to a “neurotic strand of greenery” in Europe that will render the small, former Soviet state 90 percent dependent on energy from fossil fuels. The magazine notes that populist political parties may take power in Lithuania’s autumn elections and chose to ignore the agreement to close Ignalina, threatening the country’s entry into the EU.
Closing Nuclear Plant Roils Lithuania and European Union
More From E360
-
ANALYSIS
Recycling Nuclear Waste: A Win-Win or a Dangerous Gamble?
-
CONFLICT
In War-Torn Sudan, a Gold Mining Boom Takes a Human Toll
-
Opinion
With NOAA Cuts, a Proud Legacy and Vital Science Are at Risk
-
Biodiversity
Imperiled in the Wild, Many Plants May Survive Only in Gardens
-
Climate
Can Toxic Mining Waste Help Remove CO2 from the Atmosphere?
-
INTERVIEW
Saving U.S. Climate and Environmental Data Before It Goes Away
-
Biodiversity
A Craze for Tiny Plants Is Driving a Poaching Crisis in South Africa
-
INTERVIEW
Bill McKibben on Climate Activism in the Age of Trump 2.0
-
Climate
How Climate Change Puts the Safety of Drinking Water at Risk
-
Energy
‘Green Grab’: Solar and Wind Boom Sparks Conflicts on Land Use
-
INTERVIEW
Reciprocity: Rethinking Our Relationship with the Natural World
-
Oceans
With Sea Ice Melting, Killer Whales Are Moving Into the Arctic