The Economist magazine says that the Lithuanian government erred when it agreed to shut down the aging yet “perfectly serviceable” nuclear power plant at Ignalina as a condition of joining the European Union.
By agreeing to close Ignalina in 2009 without winning approval for plans to build a more modern plant on the same site, the Economist says, the Lithuanians have bowed to a “neurotic strand of greenery” in Europe that will render the small, former Soviet state 90 percent dependent on energy from fossil fuels. The magazine notes that populist political parties may take power in Lithuania’s autumn elections and chose to ignore the agreement to close Ignalina, threatening the country’s entry into the EU.
Closing Nuclear Plant Roils Lithuania and European Union
More From E360
-
INTERVIEW
Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans?
-
Biodiversity
In Mexico’s ‘Avocado Belt,’ Villagers Stand Up to Protect Their Lands
-
Food & Agriculture
How Herbicide Drift from Farms Is Harming Trees in Midwest
-
Policy
U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
-
INTERVIEW
How a Former Herder Protected Mongolia’s Vast Grasslands
-
Solutions
A.I. Is Quietly Powering a Revolution in Weather Prediction
-
RIVERS
On a Dammed River, Amazon Villagers Fight to Restore the Flow
-
Biodiversity
With the Great Mussel Die-Off, Scientists Scramble for Answers
-
ANALYSIS
Recycling Nuclear Waste: A Win-Win or a Dangerous Gamble?
-
CONFLICT
In War-Torn Sudan, a Gold Mining Boom Takes a Human Toll
-
Opinion
With NOAA Cuts, a Proud Legacy and Vital Science Are at Risk
-
Biodiversity
Imperiled in the Wild, Many Plants May Survive Only in Gardens