The creation of carbon dioxide “domes” by heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions over urban areas makes CO2 emissions a greater health risk for city-dwellers than people who live in rural areas, according to a new study. Increased concentrations of CO2 over city areas cause local temperatures to rise, which in turn increases levels of air pollution and ground-level ozone, said Mark Z. Jacobson, director of the Atmosphere/Energy Program at Stanford and author of the study published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology. In addition, the more stable air column over cities tends to slow the dispersal of pollutants. According to Jacobson, the existence of the CO2 domes above urban areas exposes a fundamental flaw in the cap-and-trade legislation passed last year by the U.S. House of Representatives, which allows carbon emitters to trade emissions allowances regardless of location. “Not all carbon dioxide emissions are equal,” Jacobson said. “As in real estate, location matters.” His study suggests that emitters of CO2 in urban areas should pay a higher price for their pollution than emitters in rural areas.
CO2 “Domes” Over Cities Increase Local Health Risks, Study Says
More From E360
-
CONSERVATION
Out of the Wild: How A.I. Is Transforming Conservation Science
-
Energy
China’s Mega Dam Project Poses Big Risks for Asia’s Grand Canyon
-
Solutions
How Natural Solutions Can Help Islands Survive Sea Level Rise
-
INTERVIEW
Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans?
-
Biodiversity
In Mexico’s ‘Avocado Belt,’ Villagers Stand Up to Protect Their Lands
-
Food & Agriculture
How Herbicide Drift from Farms Is Harming Trees in Midwest
-
Policy
U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
-
INTERVIEW
How a Former Herder Protected Mongolia’s Vast Grasslands
-
Solutions
A.I. Is Quietly Powering a Revolution in Weather Prediction
-
RIVERS
On a Dammed River, Amazon Villagers Fight to Restore the Flow
-
Biodiversity
With the Great Mussel Die-Off, Scientists Scramble for Answers
-
ANALYSIS
Recycling Nuclear Waste: A Win-Win or a Dangerous Gamble?