Scientists Charles H. Greene, of Cornell University, and Daniel M. Kammen, of the University of California, Berkeley, offer commentary on the recent Yale Environment 360 Point/Counterpoint articles on the issue of whether universities should take a stand against climate change by divesting from companies that produce oil, natural gas, or coal. Greene and Kammen make the case that the movement to divest is gaining ground on U.S. campuses and will eventually succeed because fossil fuels are increasingly seen as a potentially risky investment. “We predict that divestment at the nation’s colleges and universities will occur much more rapidly than anybody imagined at the start of the campaign just over a year ago,” they write. Read their comment.
Comment: e360 Point/Counterpoint Debate On University Fossil Fuel Divestment
More From E360
-
Biodiversity
Arctic Wildlife Research Suffers as Geopolitical Competition Grows
-
OPINION
The U.S. Public Is Losing Its Say on Environmental Policy
-
Solutions
Fifty Billion Seedlings: Can Ethiopia Replant Its Ravaged Forests?
-
OPINION
The Solar Boom in Developing Nations: Fast, Chaotic, and Unequal
-
Climate
Why Germany Is Building an Ark for U.S. Climate Data
-
INTERVIEW
From Indigenous Loss, a Potent Legal Argument on Climate
-
Biodiversity
Sargassum Superbloom: Seaweed Scourge or Ecological Boon?
-
Oceans
A Surge of Marine Heat Waves Threatens to Scramble Ocean Life
-
Policy
A Hard-Won Rule to Cut Chemical Plant Pollution Is Being Unraveled
-
E360 FILM CONTEST WINNER
Filipino Cacao Growers Learn to Live With a Hotter Climate
-
E360 FILM CONTEST
A Bicycle Journey Across Brazil to Find a Vanishing Savanna
-
OPINION
For America’s Rarest Wildlife, Survival May Hinge on a Single Word