Genetically engineered pigs, cows, and fish moved closer to the marketplace, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued draft rules for their approval. The regulations, which are similar to the agency’s drug-approval process, would require companies to prove that a modified animal is healthy and that products derived from it are safe. In animals grown for food, potential benefits of genetic engineering range from faster growth to disease resistance to added nutrients. Other animals could be engineered to produce drugs. But animals are not drugs and shouldn’t be treated that way, said a policy analyst at the nonprofit Center for Food Safety in Washington: “Drugs don’t go out and breed with each other. When a drug gets loose, you figure you can control it. When a bull gets loose, it would be harder to corral.” Critics also said the guidelines allow industry to shield too much information from the public.
FDA Proposes Rules for Genetically Engineered Animals
More From E360
-
ANALYSIS
What Is Driving the Global Resurgence of Mangrove Forests?
-
Biodiversity
Arctic Wildlife Research Suffers as Geopolitical Competition Grows
-
OPINION
The U.S. Public Is Losing Its Say on Environmental Policy
-
Solutions
Fifty Billion Seedlings: Can Ethiopia Replant Its Ravaged Forests?
-
OPINION
The Solar Boom in Developing Nations: Fast, Chaotic, and Unequal
-
Climate
Why Germany Is Building an Ark for U.S. Climate Data
-
INTERVIEW
From Indigenous Loss, a Potent Legal Argument on Climate
-
Biodiversity
Sargassum Superbloom: Seaweed Scourge or Ecological Boon?
-
Oceans
A Surge of Marine Heat Waves Threatens to Scramble Ocean Life
-
Policy
A Hard-Won Rule to Cut Chemical Plant Pollution Is Being Unraveled
-
E360 FILM CONTEST WINNER
Filipino Cacao Growers Learn to Live With a Hotter Climate
-
E360 FILM CONTEST
A Bicycle Journey Across Brazil to Find a Vanishing Savanna