Linking natural disasters to climate change makes global warming skeptics less likely to donate money to relief efforts, says a study by psychologists at the University of Massachusetts. They asked study participants to read an article about a drought-related famine; one version of the article attributed the droughts to climate change, and the other version made no mention of climate. The researchers then asked the participants why they would or would not donate money for relief, and about their climate change beliefs. Participants who were skeptical about global warming gave more justifications for not helping the victims when the disaster was attributed to climate change than when it was not, the study found. “What our work suggests is that when a disaster occurs and organizations are appealing to the public for aid, it is best to minimize the inclusion of heavily politicized topics,” lead author Daniel Chapman told ClimateWire.
Linking Disasters to Climate Makes Skeptics Less Likely to Donate
More From E360
-
Solutions
Restoring the Flow: A Milestone in the Revival of the Everglades
-
Climate
Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current
-
MINING
In Coal Country, Black Lung Surges as Federal Protections Stall
-
Biodiversity
Older and Wiser: How Elder Animals Help Species to Survive
-
Climate
Rusting Rivers: Alarm Grows Over Uptick in Acidic Arctic Waters
-
ANALYSIS
A More Troubling Picture of Sea Level Rise Is Coming into View
-
INTERVIEW
Why Protecting Flowering Plants Is Crucial to Our Future
-
OPINION
Trying Times: Keeping the Faith as Environmental Gains Are Lost
-
ANALYSIS
As It Boosts Renewables, China Still Can’t Break Its Coal Addiction
-
OPINION
Can America’s Wolves Survive an Onslaught of Political Attacks?
-
MINING
As Zambia Pushes New Mining, a Legacy of Pollution Looms
-
Biodiversity
Long Overlooked as Crucial to Life, Fungi Start to Get Their Due