Linking natural disasters to climate change makes global warming skeptics less likely to donate money to relief efforts, says a study by psychologists at the University of Massachusetts. They asked study participants to read an article about a drought-related famine; one version of the article attributed the droughts to climate change, and the other version made no mention of climate. The researchers then asked the participants why they would or would not donate money for relief, and about their climate change beliefs. Participants who were skeptical about global warming gave more justifications for not helping the victims when the disaster was attributed to climate change than when it was not, the study found. “What our work suggests is that when a disaster occurs and organizations are appealing to the public for aid, it is best to minimize the inclusion of heavily politicized topics,” lead author Daniel Chapman told ClimateWire.
Linking Disasters to Climate Makes Skeptics Less Likely to Donate
More From E360
-
ANALYSIS
Overshoot: The World Is Hitting Point of No Return on Climate
-
Solutions
In Hunt for Rare Earths, Companies Are Scouring Mining Waste
-
Oceans
Sea Star Murder Mystery: What’s Killing a Key Ocean Species?
-
Solutions
Plagued by Flooding, an African City Reengineers Its Wetlands
-
WATER
After Ruining a Treasured Water Resource, Iran Is Drying Up
-
FILM
At a Marine Field Station, Rising Seas Force an Inevitable Retreat
-
Energy
To Feed Data Centers, Pennsylvania Faces a New Fracking Surge
-
SPACE
Scientists Warn of Emissions Risks from the Surge in Satellites
-
WILDLIFE
A Troubling Rise in the Grisly Trade of a Spectacular African Bird
-
Energy
In Myanmar, Illicit Rare Earth Mining Is Taking a Heavy Toll
-
INTERVIEW
How Batteries, Not Natural Gas, Can Power the Data Center Boom
-
ANALYSIS
As U.S. and E.U. Retreat on Climate, China Takes the Leadership Role