Linking natural disasters to climate change makes global warming skeptics less likely to donate money to relief efforts, says a study by psychologists at the University of Massachusetts. They asked study participants to read an article about a drought-related famine; one version of the article attributed the droughts to climate change, and the other version made no mention of climate. The researchers then asked the participants why they would or would not donate money for relief, and about their climate change beliefs. Participants who were skeptical about global warming gave more justifications for not helping the victims when the disaster was attributed to climate change than when it was not, the study found. “What our work suggests is that when a disaster occurs and organizations are appealing to the public for aid, it is best to minimize the inclusion of heavily politicized topics,” lead author Daniel Chapman told ClimateWire.
Linking Disasters to Climate Makes Skeptics Less Likely to Donate
More From E360
-
Energy
A Home Battery Revolution Is Reshaping the Power Grid
-
Energy
In East Africa, a Controversial Oil Project Is Poised for Production
-
Climate
A Missing Piece in Climate Models: Nature’s Own Emissions
-
INTERVIEW
An EPA Researcher Details the Agency’s Assault on Science
-
Oceans
Efforts to Save Kelp Forests from Ocean Warming Are Ramping Up
-
Biodiversity
Pollution Is Changing the Smells of Nature, With Risks for Wildlife
-
Oceans
Supertrawlers Are Taking Antarctic Krill That Whales Depend On
-
INTERVIEW
The U.S. Senator Who Won’t Shut Up about Climate Change
-
Energy
A First Among Major Nations, India Is Industrializing With Solar
-
A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR
After Two Decades, E360’s Founder and Editor Is Moving On
-
Solutions
Restoring the Flow: A Milestone in the Revival of the Everglades
-
Climate
Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current