U.S. officials have rejected a proposal to regulate the planting of genetically modified alfalfa, a decision seen as a triumph for advocates of biotech crops. After conducting an analysis of economic and environmental factors, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack determined that alfalfa engineered to be resistant to the herbicide Roundup (commonly known as glyphosate) “is as safe as traditionally bred alfalfa.” The decision, which allows GM farmers to get crops in the ground this spring, is a significant setback for organic farmers who have claimed that such genetically altered crops can affect their farmland as bees and other insects cross-pollinate genetically modifed strains with organically certified, non-engineered alfalfa strains. Opponents also say the increased use of herbicides on genetically modifed crops is creating chemical-resistant “super weeds” and an increase in chemical residues in U.S. food. Alfalfa is the fourth-biggest field crop in the U.S., generating $8 billion to $10 billion as feed for livestock.
U.S. Scraps Plans to Restrict Planting of Genetically Modified Alfalfa
More From E360
-
INTERVIEW
Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans?
-
Biodiversity
In Mexico’s ‘Avocado Belt,’ Villagers Stand Up to Protect Their Lands
-
Food & Agriculture
How Herbicide Drift from Farms Is Harming Trees in Midwest
-
Policy
U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
-
INTERVIEW
How a Former Herder Protected Mongolia’s Vast Grasslands
-
Solutions
A.I. Is Quietly Powering a Revolution in Weather Prediction
-
RIVERS
On a Dammed River, Amazon Villagers Fight to Restore the Flow
-
Biodiversity
With the Great Mussel Die-Off, Scientists Scramble for Answers
-
ANALYSIS
Recycling Nuclear Waste: A Win-Win or a Dangerous Gamble?
-
CONFLICT
In War-Torn Sudan, a Gold Mining Boom Takes a Human Toll
-
Opinion
With NOAA Cuts, a Proud Legacy and Vital Science Are at Risk
-
Biodiversity
Imperiled in the Wild, Many Plants May Survive Only in Gardens