In a recent commentary in Nature, aquatic ecologist Wendy Palen and seven colleagues were sharply critical of the way that Canada and the United States have gone about developing Alberta’s vast tar sands deposits and the infrastructure needed to transport those fossil fuels to market. Rather than looking at the cumulative impact of this massive energy development on the climate and the environment, Palen and her co-authors wrote, major decisions have been made in piecemeal fashion. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Palen talks about why a moratorium on new tar sands developments is needed, how the decision-making process is biased in favor of short-term economic benefits, why the fate of the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline is critical, and what can be done to begin factoring in the real costs of exploiting the tar sands.
Interview: Calling for Moratorium On Development of Tar Sands Oil
More From E360
-
Energy
In East Africa, a Controversial Oil Project Is Poised for Production
-
Climate
A Missing Piece in Climate Models: Nature’s Own Emissions
-
INTERVIEW
An EPA Researcher Details the Agency’s Assault on Science
-
Oceans
Efforts to Save Kelp Forests from Ocean Warming Are Ramping Up
-
Biodiversity
Pollution Is Changing the Smells of Nature, With Risks for Wildlife
-
Oceans
Supertrawlers Are Taking Antarctic Krill That Whales Depend On
-
INTERVIEW
The U.S. Senator Who Won’t Shut Up about Climate Change
-
Energy
A First Among Major Nations, India Is Industrializing With Solar
-
A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR
After Two Decades, E360’s Founder and Editor Is Moving On
-
Solutions
Restoring the Flow: A Milestone in the Revival of the Everglades
-
Climate
Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current
-
MINING
In Coal Country, Black Lung Surges as Federal Protections Stall