In a recent commentary in Nature, aquatic ecologist Wendy Palen and seven colleagues were sharply critical of the way that Canada and the United States have gone about developing Alberta’s vast tar sands deposits and the infrastructure needed to transport those fossil fuels to market. Rather than looking at the cumulative impact of this massive energy development on the climate and the environment, Palen and her co-authors wrote, major decisions have been made in piecemeal fashion. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Palen talks about why a moratorium on new tar sands developments is needed, how the decision-making process is biased in favor of short-term economic benefits, why the fate of the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline is critical, and what can be done to begin factoring in the real costs of exploiting the tar sands.
Interview: Calling for Moratorium On Development of Tar Sands Oil
More From E360
-
Solutions
Restoring the Flow: A Milestone in the Revival of the Everglades
-
Climate
Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current
-
MINING
In Coal Country, Black Lung Surges as Federal Protections Stall
-
Biodiversity
Older and Wiser: How Elder Animals Help Species to Survive
-
Climate
Rusting Rivers: Alarm Grows Over Uptick in Acidic Arctic Waters
-
ANALYSIS
A More Troubling Picture of Sea Level Rise Is Coming into View
-
INTERVIEW
Why Protecting Flowering Plants Is Crucial to Our Future
-
OPINION
Trying Times: Keeping the Faith as Environmental Gains Are Lost
-
ANALYSIS
As It Boosts Renewables, China Still Can’t Break Its Coal Addiction
-
OPINION
Can America’s Wolves Survive an Onslaught of Political Attacks?
-
MINING
As Zambia Pushes New Mining, a Legacy of Pollution Looms
-
Biodiversity
Long Overlooked as Crucial to Life, Fungi Start to Get Their Due