In a recent commentary in Nature, aquatic ecologist Wendy Palen and seven colleagues were sharply critical of the way that Canada and the United States have gone about developing Alberta’s vast tar sands deposits and the infrastructure needed to transport those fossil fuels to market. Rather than looking at the cumulative impact of this massive energy development on the climate and the environment, Palen and her co-authors wrote, major decisions have been made in piecemeal fashion. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Palen talks about why a moratorium on new tar sands developments is needed, how the decision-making process is biased in favor of short-term economic benefits, why the fate of the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline is critical, and what can be done to begin factoring in the real costs of exploiting the tar sands.
Interview: Calling for Moratorium On Development of Tar Sands Oil
More From E360
-
OPINION
The U.S. Public Is Losing Its Say on Environmental Policy
-
Solutions
Fifty Billion Seedlings: Can Ethiopia Replant Its Ravaged Forests?
-
OPINION
The Solar Boom in Developing Nations: Fast, Chaotic, and Unequal
-
Climate
Why Germany Is Building an Ark for U.S. Climate Data
-
INTERVIEW
From Indigenous Loss, a Potent Legal Argument on Climate
-
Biodiversity
Sargassum Superbloom: Seaweed Scourge or Ecological Boon?
-
Oceans
A Surge of Marine Heat Waves Threatens to Scramble Ocean Life
-
Policy
A Hard-Won Rule to Cut Chemical Plant Pollution Is Being Unraveled
-
E360 FILM CONTEST WINNER
Filipino Cacao Growers Learn to Live With a Hotter Climate
-
E360 FILM CONTEST
A Bicycle Journey Across Brazil to Find a Vanishing Savanna
-
OPINION
For America’s Rarest Wildlife, Survival May Hinge on a Single Word
-
E360 Film Contest
Who Gets to Decide the Fate of a Pristine Alaskan Rainforest?