The world is placing too much credence on being able to combat climate change by pulling carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, a process known as “air capture,” according to an article in the journal Science this week. “Negative-emission technologies are not an insurance policy, but rather an unjust and high-stakes gamble,” wrote the article’s authors, Kevin Anderson, a climate scientist at the University of Manchester in the U.K, and Glen Peters, a scientist at CICERO, a climate research organization in Norway. “There is a real risk they will be unable to deliver on the scale of their promise,” and assuming otherwise is “a moral hazard par excellence,” they wrote. Carbon capture technologies are a key component of the Paris climate agreement, with many of the modeling scenarios assuming the technology will be operating on a large scale later this century, reported Climate Central.
Is There Too Much EmphasisBeing Placed on Carbon Capture Technology?
More From E360
-
Energy
In East Africa, a Controversial Oil Project Is Poised for Production
-
Climate
A Missing Piece in Climate Models: Nature’s Own Emissions
-
INTERVIEW
An EPA Researcher Details the Agency’s Assault on Science
-
Oceans
Efforts to Save Kelp Forests from Ocean Warming Are Ramping Up
-
Biodiversity
Pollution Is Changing the Smells of Nature, With Risks for Wildlife
-
Oceans
Supertrawlers Are Taking Antarctic Krill That Whales Depend On
-
INTERVIEW
The U.S. Senator Who Won’t Shut Up about Climate Change
-
Energy
A First Among Major Nations, India Is Industrializing With Solar
-
A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR
After Two Decades, E360’s Founder and Editor Is Moving On
-
Solutions
Restoring the Flow: A Milestone in the Revival of the Everglades
-
Climate
Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current
-
MINING
In Coal Country, Black Lung Surges as Federal Protections Stall