The world is placing too much credence on being able to combat climate change by pulling carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, a process known as “air capture,” according to an article in the journal Science this week. “Negative-emission technologies are not an insurance policy, but rather an unjust and high-stakes gamble,” wrote the article’s authors, Kevin Anderson, a climate scientist at the University of Manchester in the U.K, and Glen Peters, a scientist at CICERO, a climate research organization in Norway. “There is a real risk they will be unable to deliver on the scale of their promise,” and assuming otherwise is “a moral hazard par excellence,” they wrote. Carbon capture technologies are a key component of the Paris climate agreement, with many of the modeling scenarios assuming the technology will be operating on a large scale later this century, reported Climate Central.
Is There Too Much EmphasisBeing Placed on Carbon Capture Technology?
More From E360
-
OPINION
Power Shift: State Election Wins Open Path for Climate Progress
-
Food & Agriculture
How This Year’s Super El Niño Will Worsen Global Hunger
-
WATER
As the Colorado River Shrinks, Calls to Drain Lake Powell Grow
-
ANALYSIS
What Is Driving the Global Resurgence of Mangrove Forests?
-
Biodiversity
Arctic Wildlife Research Suffers as Geopolitical Competition Grows
-
OPINION
The U.S. Public Is Losing Its Say on Environmental Policy
-
Solutions
Fifty Billion Seedlings: Can Ethiopia Replant Its Ravaged Forests?
-
OPINION
The Solar Boom in Developing Nations: Fast, Chaotic, and Unequal
-
Climate
Why Germany Is Building an Ark for U.S. Climate Data
-
INTERVIEW
From Indigenous Loss, a Potent Legal Argument on Climate
-
Biodiversity
Sargassum Superbloom: Seaweed Scourge or Ecological Boon?
-
Oceans
A Surge of Marine Heat Waves Threatens to Scramble Ocean Life