The world is placing too much credence on being able to combat climate change by pulling carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, a process known as “air capture,” according to an article in the journal Science this week. “Negative-emission technologies are not an insurance policy, but rather an unjust and high-stakes gamble,” wrote the article’s authors, Kevin Anderson, a climate scientist at the University of Manchester in the U.K, and Glen Peters, a scientist at CICERO, a climate research organization in Norway. “There is a real risk they will be unable to deliver on the scale of their promise,” and assuming otherwise is “a moral hazard par excellence,” they wrote. Carbon capture technologies are a key component of the Paris climate agreement, with many of the modeling scenarios assuming the technology will be operating on a large scale later this century, reported Climate Central.
Is There Too Much EmphasisBeing Placed on Carbon Capture Technology?
More From E360
-
WATER
After Ruining a Treasured Water Resource, Iran Is Drying Up
-
FILM
At a Marine Field Station, Rising Seas Force an Inevitable Retreat
-
Energy
To Feed Data Centers, Pennsylvania Faces a New Fracking Surge
-
SPACE
Scientists Warn of Emissions Risks from the Surge in Satellites
-
WILDLIFE
A Troubling Rise in the Grisly Trade of a Spectacular African Bird
-
MINING
In Myanmar, Illicit Rare Earth Mining Is Taking a Heavy Toll
-
INTERVIEW
How Batteries, Not Natural Gas, Can Power the Data Center Boom
-
ANALYSIS
As U.S. and E.U. Retreat on Climate, China Takes the Leadership Role
-
Solutions
From Ruins to Reuse: How Ukrainians Are Repurposing War Waste
-
ANALYSIS
Carbon Offsets Are Failing. Can a New Plan Save the Rainforests?
-
Energy
Facing a Hostile Administration, U.S. Offshore Wind Is in Retreat
-
Biodiversity
As Jaguars Recover, Will the Border Wall Block Their U.S. Return?