Michael Mack, the chief executive of the Swiss agrobusiness conglomerate, Syngenta, says organic farming does far more harm to the planet than conventional farming because organic methods often require 30 percent more land. Given the need to feed rapidly rising populations this century, increasing productivity on existing agricultural land is crucial, which means that conventional methods using chemical fertilizers and pesticides are superior to organic farming, Mack told The New York Times. “Organic food is not only not better for the planet,” said Mack, whose company sold $12 billion in seeds and “crop protection” technologies last year, “it is categorically worse. If the whole planet were to suddenly switch to organic farming tomorrow, it would be an ecological disaster.” Mack defended pesticides as being “absolutely not harmful” to humans or the environment and said modern farming methods had greatly boosted yields. Organic farming, he said, is the “productive equivalent of driving an S.U.V.”
Agribusiness Executive Attacks Organic Food Movement
More From E360
-
Biodiversity
Older and Wiser: How Elder Animals Help Species to Survive
-
Climate
Rusting Rivers: Alarm Grows Over Uptick in Acidic Arctic Waters
-
ANALYSIS
A More Troubling Picture of Sea Level Rise Is Coming into View
-
INTERVIEW
Why Protecting Flowering Plants Is Crucial to Our Future
-
OPINION
Trying Times: Keeping the Faith as Environmental Gains Are Lost
-
ANALYSIS
As It Boosts Renewables, China Still Can’t Break Its Coal Addiction
-
OPINION
Can America’s Wolves Survive an Onslaught of Political Attacks?
-
MINING
As Zambia Pushes New Mining, a Legacy of Pollution Looms
-
Biodiversity
Long Overlooked as Crucial to Life, Fungi Start to Get Their Due
-
ANALYSIS
Species Slowdown: Is Nature’s Ability to Self-Repair Stalling?
-
OPINION
Beyond ‘Endangerment’: Finding a Way Forward for U.S. on Climate
-
Solutions
The E.U.’s Burgeoning Repair Movement Is Set to Get a Boost