Michael Mack, the chief executive of the Swiss agrobusiness conglomerate, Syngenta, says organic farming does far more harm to the planet than conventional farming because organic methods often require 30 percent more land. Given the need to feed rapidly rising populations this century, increasing productivity on existing agricultural land is crucial, which means that conventional methods using chemical fertilizers and pesticides are superior to organic farming, Mack told The New York Times. “Organic food is not only not better for the planet,” said Mack, whose company sold $12 billion in seeds and “crop protection” technologies last year, “it is categorically worse. If the whole planet were to suddenly switch to organic farming tomorrow, it would be an ecological disaster.” Mack defended pesticides as being “absolutely not harmful” to humans or the environment and said modern farming methods had greatly boosted yields. Organic farming, he said, is the “productive equivalent of driving an S.U.V.”
Agribusiness Executive Attacks Organic Food Movement
More From E360
-
Biodiversity
Arctic Wildlife Research Suffers as Geopolitical Competition Grows
-
OPINION
The U.S. Public Is Losing Its Say on Environmental Policy
-
Solutions
Fifty Billion Seedlings: Can Ethiopia Replant Its Ravaged Forests?
-
OPINION
The Solar Boom in Developing Nations: Fast, Chaotic, and Unequal
-
Climate
Why Germany Is Building an Ark for U.S. Climate Data
-
INTERVIEW
From Indigenous Loss, a Potent Legal Argument on Climate
-
Biodiversity
Sargassum Superbloom: Seaweed Scourge or Ecological Boon?
-
Oceans
A Surge of Marine Heat Waves Threatens to Scramble Ocean Life
-
Policy
A Hard-Won Rule to Cut Chemical Plant Pollution Is Being Unraveled
-
E360 FILM CONTEST WINNER
Filipino Cacao Growers Learn to Live With a Hotter Climate
-
E360 FILM CONTEST
A Bicycle Journey Across Brazil to Find a Vanishing Savanna
-
OPINION
For America’s Rarest Wildlife, Survival May Hinge on a Single Word