When international delegates meet in Paris next year to negotiate a new climate agreement, they’ll be aiming to keep the global average temperature from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the maximum seen by many for avoiding the worst impacts of climate change. But David Victor, a professor of international relations at University of California San Diego, argued in a recent controversial commentary in Nature that the 2-degree goal is now unattainable and should be replaced by more meaningful goals. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Victor explains why he believes the 2-degree threshold has failed to position policy makers to take serious action on climate change and outlines the “basket of indicators” that he and his co-author are suggesting be used instead.
Interview: A Call for Climate Goals Other Than Two Degrees Celsius
More From E360
-
Solutions
In Hunt for Rare Earths, Companies Are Scouring Mining Waste
-
Oceans
Sea Star Murder Mystery: What’s Killing a Key Ocean Species?
-
Solutions
Plagued by Flooding, an African City Reengineers Its Wetlands
-
WATER
After Ruining a Treasured Water Resource, Iran Is Drying Up
-
FILM
At a Marine Field Station, Rising Seas Force an Inevitable Retreat
-
Energy
To Feed Data Centers, Pennsylvania Faces a New Fracking Surge
-
SPACE
Scientists Warn of Emissions Risks from the Surge in Satellites
-
WILDLIFE
A Troubling Rise in the Grisly Trade of a Spectacular African Bird
-
MINING
In Myanmar, Illicit Rare Earth Mining Is Taking a Heavy Toll
-
INTERVIEW
How Batteries, Not Natural Gas, Can Power the Data Center Boom
-
ANALYSIS
As U.S. and E.U. Retreat on Climate, China Takes the Leadership Role
-
Solutions
From Ruins to Reuse: How Ukrainians Are Repurposing War Waste