Geoengineering, an experimental series of technologies aimed at counteracting the effects of climate change, could potentially diminish political polarization over global warming, according to new research. Roughly 3,000 participants in a study displayed more open-mindedness toward evidence of climate change and more agreement on the significance of such evidence after learning about geoengineering technologies, according to a study conducted by researchers at Yale and other universities. Participants became more polarized when they were told that curbing climate change would require reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers report. The findings come after a report this week from the U.S. National Research Council recommended limited government-sponsored research into the use of sulfate aerosols, a potential geoengineering strategy known as albedo modification.
Learning About Geoengineering Spurs More Agreement on Climate, Study Says
More From E360
-
Policy
U.S. Push for Greenland’s Minerals Faces Harsh Arctic Realities
-
ANALYSIS
Overshoot: The World Is Hitting Point of No Return on Climate
-
Solutions
In Hunt for Rare Earths, Companies Are Scouring Mining Waste
-
Oceans
Sea Star Murder Mystery: What’s Killing a Key Ocean Species?
-
Solutions
Plagued by Flooding, an African City Reengineers Its Wetlands
-
WATER
After Ruining a Treasured Water Resource, Iran Is Drying Up
-
FILM
At a Marine Field Station, Rising Seas Force an Inevitable Retreat
-
Energy
To Feed Data Centers, Pennsylvania Faces a New Fracking Surge
-
SPACE
Scientists Warn of Emissions Risks from the Surge in Satellites
-
WILDLIFE
A Troubling Rise in the Grisly Trade of a Spectacular African Bird
-
Energy
In Myanmar, Illicit Rare Earth Mining Is Taking a Heavy Toll
-
INTERVIEW
How Batteries, Not Natural Gas, Can Power the Data Center Boom