Geoengineering, an experimental series of technologies aimed at counteracting the effects of climate change, could potentially diminish political polarization over global warming, according to new research. Roughly 3,000 participants in a study displayed more open-mindedness toward evidence of climate change and more agreement on the significance of such evidence after learning about geoengineering technologies, according to a study conducted by researchers at Yale and other universities. Participants became more polarized when they were told that curbing climate change would require reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers report. The findings come after a report this week from the U.S. National Research Council recommended limited government-sponsored research into the use of sulfate aerosols, a potential geoengineering strategy known as albedo modification.
Learning About Geoengineering Spurs More Agreement on Climate, Study Says
More From E360
-
OPINION
Power Shift: State Election Wins Open Path for Climate Progress
-
Food & Agriculture
How This Year’s Super El Niño Will Worsen Global Hunger
-
WATER
As the Colorado River Shrinks, Calls to Drain Lake Powell Grow
-
ANALYSIS
What Is Driving the Global Resurgence of Mangrove Forests?
-
Biodiversity
Arctic Wildlife Research Suffers as Geopolitical Competition Grows
-
OPINION
The U.S. Public Is Losing Its Say on Environmental Policy
-
Solutions
Fifty Billion Seedlings: Can Ethiopia Replant Its Ravaged Forests?
-
OPINION
The Solar Boom in Developing Nations: Fast, Chaotic, and Unequal
-
Climate
Why Germany Is Building an Ark for U.S. Climate Data
-
INTERVIEW
From Indigenous Loss, a Potent Legal Argument on Climate
-
Biodiversity
Sargassum Superbloom: Seaweed Scourge or Ecological Boon?
-
Oceans
A Surge of Marine Heat Waves Threatens to Scramble Ocean Life