Geoengineering, an experimental series of technologies aimed at counteracting the effects of climate change, could potentially diminish political polarization over global warming, according to new research. Roughly 3,000 participants in a study displayed more open-mindedness toward evidence of climate change and more agreement on the significance of such evidence after learning about geoengineering technologies, according to a study conducted by researchers at Yale and other universities. Participants became more polarized when they were told that curbing climate change would require reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers report. The findings come after a report this week from the U.S. National Research Council recommended limited government-sponsored research into the use of sulfate aerosols, a potential geoengineering strategy known as albedo modification.
Learning About Geoengineering Spurs More Agreement on Climate, Study Says
More From E360
-
OPINION
For America’s Rarest Wildlife, Survival May Hinge on a Single Word
-
E360 Film Contest
Who Gets to Decide the Fate of a Pristine Alaskan Rainforest?
-
Biodiversity
‘Wastelands’ No More: India Charts a Future for Its Grasslands
-
Climate
After Decades of Drought, Water Is Rising in the African Sahel
-
Cities
In Steel Country, the Fight for Clean Air Faces New Obstacles
-
Solutions
Beyond Lithium: New Battery Tech Starts to Break Through
-
INTERVIEW
What Do We Actually Know About the Microplastics Inside Us?
-
Energy
A Home Battery Revolution Is Reshaping the Power Grid
-
Energy
In East Africa, a Controversial Oil Project Is Poised for Production
-
Climate
A Missing Piece in Climate Models: Nature’s Own Emissions
-
INTERVIEW
An EPA Researcher Details the Agency’s Assault on Science
-
Oceans
Efforts to Save Kelp Forests from Ocean Warming Are Ramping Up