The worldwide economic downturn has badly hurt waste recycling programs across the U.S., as plummeting demand for recycled materials has drastically lowered prices, left waste materials piling up in warehouses, and forced some municipalities to scale back their recycling programs. The New York Times reports that both governments and private companies involved in recycling have been affected by the recycling recession, which has caused prices for recycled paper to fall on the West Coast from $105 per ton in October to $20 to $25 today and for the price of tin to plunge from $327 a ton in early 2008 to $5 a ton. Most municipalities are continuing their recycling programs because it remains cheaper to recycle waste than dump it in landfills, but some counties are calling on residents to stockpile their own plastic and metals until prices rebound. Perhaps the biggest reason for the crash in recycling is the economic slump in China, whose industries are the largest buyers of recycled paper, metals, and plastics from the U.S. Many U.S. recycling companies are now warehousing recycled materials in the hope that prices will rise in 2009.
Recycling Programs Suffer As Global Recession Drives Down Prices
More From E360
-
Solutions
How Natural Solutions Can Help Islands Survive Sea Level Rise
-
INTERVIEW
Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans?
-
Biodiversity
In Mexico’s ‘Avocado Belt,’ Villagers Stand Up to Protect Their Lands
-
Food & Agriculture
How Herbicide Drift from Farms Is Harming Trees in Midwest
-
Policy
U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
-
INTERVIEW
How a Former Herder Protected Mongolia’s Vast Grasslands
-
Solutions
A.I. Is Quietly Powering a Revolution in Weather Prediction
-
RIVERS
On a Dammed River, Amazon Villagers Fight to Restore the Flow
-
Biodiversity
With the Great Mussel Die-Off, Scientists Scramble for Answers
-
ANALYSIS
Recycling Nuclear Waste: A Win-Win or a Dangerous Gamble?
-
CONFLICT
In War-Torn Sudan, a Gold Mining Boom Takes a Human Toll
-
Opinion
With NOAA Cuts, a Proud Legacy and Vital Science Are at Risk