Policy divisions between the Obama Administration and European leaders on how carbon reductions would be measured could jeopardize the chances of success during climate talks in Copenhagen, according to The Guardian. European leaders want to retain the way carbon reduction targets are counted according to a provision in the Kyoto Protocol, in which CO2 reductions are subject to an international system, but the U.S. wants each country to set its own rules. While the U.S. has not introduced specific details, a draft agreement suggested emissions cuts should be subject to “conformity with domestic law.” According to sources quoted in the London newspaper, European leaders are reluctant to challenge the Obama administration, which has shown more willingness to confront climate change than the Bush administration. But there is mounting concern that the divisions could jeopardize the chances of a meaningful agreement at the Copenhagen talks in December. Ban Ki-moon, the UN general secretary, said he is troubled by the lack of progress in climate negotiations. “We are deeply concerned that the negotiation is not making much headway,” he said.
Rift Between U.S. and Europe Could Jeopardize Climate Negotiations
More From E360
-
MINING
In Coal Country, Black Lung Surges as Federal Protections Stall
-
Biodiversity
Older and Wiser: How Elder Animals Help Species to Survive
-
Climate
Rusting Rivers: Alarm Grows Over Uptick in Acidic Arctic Waters
-
ANALYSIS
A More Troubling Picture of Sea Level Rise Is Coming into View
-
INTERVIEW
Why Protecting Flowering Plants Is Crucial to Our Future
-
OPINION
Trying Times: Keeping the Faith as Environmental Gains Are Lost
-
ANALYSIS
As It Boosts Renewables, China Still Can’t Break Its Coal Addiction
-
OPINION
Can America’s Wolves Survive an Onslaught of Political Attacks?
-
MINING
As Zambia Pushes New Mining, a Legacy of Pollution Looms
-
Biodiversity
Long Overlooked as Crucial to Life, Fungi Start to Get Their Due
-
ANALYSIS
Species Slowdown: Is Nature’s Ability to Self-Repair Stalling?
-
OPINION
Beyond ‘Endangerment’: Finding a Way Forward for U.S. on Climate