The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear Chevron Corp.’s challenge of an $18.2 billion judgment issued by an Ecuadorian court over large-scale damages caused by oil drilling in the Amazon. The Supreme Court decision is the latest development in a long legal battle that led to a ruling last year by an Ecuadorean court that Chevron had to pay the damages for massive oil dumping by Texaco, which Chevron acquired in 2001. Chevron was challenging a ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York that would have effectively opened the way for worldwide enforcement of the judgment against Chevron. An Ecuadorean court found that an oil consortium run by Texaco dumped billions of gallons of oil and toxic sludge in the Amazon rainforest from 1964 through 1992, badly polluting water supplies and causing health problems among some of the 30,000 plaintiffs in the Lago Ario region. Chevron vowed to continue to fight the Ecuadorean court’s decision, which it called “fraudulent” and tainted by judicial misconduct. Chevron contends that the decision is not enforceable under New York law.
U.S. Supreme Court Refuses Chevron Challenge of Ecuador Damages
More From E360
-
Policy
Forest Defenders: A Panamanian Tribe Regains Control of Its Lands
-
Water
As World’s Deltas Sink, Rising Seas Are Far from Only Culprit
-
Energy
As Big Energy Gains, Can Europe’s Community Renewables Compete?
-
Energy
Can Geothermal Power Play a Key Role in the Energy Transition?
-
Photo Essay
Overview: Transforming Land and Sea for a More Sustainable World
-
Solutions
In Boost for Renewables, Grid-Scale Battery Storage Is on the Rise
-
Interview
Filthy Water: A Basic Sanitation Problem Persists in Rural America
-
Biodiversity
How Non-Native Plants Are Contributing to a Global Insect Decline
-
Opinion
How Biden Can Put the U.S. on a Path to Carbon-Free Electricity
-
Conservation
Amid Tensions in Myanmar, An Indigenous Park of Peace Is Born
-
Public Health
As South Africa Clings to Coal, A Struggle for the Right to Breathe
-
Interview
Equitable Retreat: The Need for Fairness in Relocating Coastal Communities