Spraying particles into the stratosphere to help cool the planet could increase crop yields in most regions of the world, but could also introduce unintended risks, according to a new study. In a paper published in the online journal Nature Climate Change, researchers used computer models to test the effects of adding sulfate aerosols to the stratosphere to deflect some sunlight from reaching the Earth — one of many so-called geoengineering schemes proposed to reduce global warming. The study said the technique would likely improve crop yields, since it would reduce some of the climate change effects most harmful to plants — including excessive heat — while allowing the plants to benefit from higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. However, the study found that the process could increase political conflict and would do nothing to alleviate the effects of ocean acidification. “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is likely a safer option than geoengineering to avert risks to global food security,” said Julia Pongratz of the Carnegie Institution for Science and lead author of the study.
Geoengineering Scheme Could Boost Crop Production, Study Says
More From E360
-
CONSERVATION
Out of the Wild: How A.I. Is Transforming Conservation Science
-
Energy
China’s Mega Dam Project Poses Big Risks for Asia’s Grand Canyon
-
Solutions
How Natural Solutions Can Help Islands Survive Sea Level Rise
-
INTERVIEW
Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans?
-
Biodiversity
In Mexico’s ‘Avocado Belt,’ Villagers Stand Up to Protect Their Lands
-
Food & Agriculture
How Herbicide Drift from Farms Is Harming Trees in Midwest
-
Policy
U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
-
INTERVIEW
How a Former Herder Protected Mongolia’s Vast Grasslands
-
Solutions
A.I. Is Quietly Powering a Revolution in Weather Prediction
-
RIVERS
On a Dammed River, Amazon Villagers Fight to Restore the Flow
-
Biodiversity
With the Great Mussel Die-Off, Scientists Scramble for Answers
-
ANALYSIS
Recycling Nuclear Waste: A Win-Win or a Dangerous Gamble?